The dataset could not be loaded because the splits use different data file formats, which is not supported. Read more about the splits configuration. Click for more details.
Error code: FileFormatMismatchBetweenSplitsError
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
PointDiT global-uniform-512d12
Image-to-point-cloud flow matching model (global_image_point_joint): frozen DINOv3 ViT-B/16 image encoder + 512-dim, 12-layer point decoder (153.6M params), 8192 points per image, trained on ScanNet++ img_full_gt (721 scenes / 71,712 images).
Code: experiments/global_point/ on branch global-uniform-512d12 of the PointDiT repo.
Files
global-uniform-512d12/checkpoint-last.pth— final checkpoint (epoch 15, step 16,815). Full training checkpoint:model(incl. frozen DINOv3),decoder_ema,optimizer,config, RNG states; can be passed to--resume. sha256f71698c5e8a8e6aa2e6b7a087dec9180dcf068318a321786b0d77b3263e50b35.global-uniform-512d12/eval/eval-global512-{raw,ema}-steps{3,10,50}/—metrics.json(protocol + image/scene/per-scene means) andvisuals/: 135 sampled val images (first/middle/last image of each of the 45 scenes) with the input RGB (*.rgb.jpg) and GT + predicted point clouds (*.points.js, base64 float32 xyz). Openvisuals/index.htmllocally (after downloading the folder) to view them. Each eval folder also hasper_image_json.tar(4,479 per-image metric JSONs; metrics only, no point clouds) andeval.log.global-uniform-512d12/train/—resolved_config.jsonandtrain.log(machine paths replaced by$RUN_ROOT/and$CODE/),provenance.json, audit JSONs, tensorboard events.
Training
4×A800, global batch 64, lr 1e-4 (1 warmup epoch), AdamW wd 0.05, 15 epochs, uniform t sampler, noise scale 2.0, EMA 0.9999, bf16 autocast.
Evaluation (protocol official_val_raw100_global_v4)
ScanNet++ official val, 4,479 images / 45 scenes (no overlap with training scenes), bf16, seed 20261007, 8192 points, no test-time alignment. Image mean over all images (scene mean is nearly identical, see metrics.json).
cd2, acc, comp: lower is better; F@τ: higher is better; radius_ratio: predicted/GT mean radius (1 = correct scale).
| weights | steps | cd2 | acc | comp | F@0.02 | F@0.05 | F@0.1 | radius_ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| raw | 3 | 0.1844 | 0.1793 | 0.2929 | 0.030 | 0.138 | 0.263 | 0.430 |
| raw | 10 | 0.0701 | 0.1428 | 0.1283 | 0.045 | 0.256 | 0.506 | 0.802 |
| raw | 50 | 0.0620 | 0.1375 | 0.1122 | 0.048 | 0.267 | 0.551 | 0.961 |
| ema | 3 | 0.0902 | 0.1581 | 0.1595 | 0.037 | 0.216 | 0.433 | 0.694 |
| ema | 10 | 0.0827 | 0.1423 | 0.1564 | 0.039 | 0.230 | 0.470 | 0.924 |
| ema | 50 | 0.1050 | 0.1421 | 0.2014 | 0.035 | 0.183 | 0.393 | 0.996 |
Best: raw weights, 50 steps. EMA (decay 0.9999) has seen only ~17k steps and gets worse at 50 steps.
The RGB images and GT point clouds in visuals/ are derived from ScanNet++ and are subject to the ScanNet++ terms of use.
- Downloads last month
- 105