Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
src
stringlengths
1
9.29k
|Viewing Single Post From: Spoilers for the Week of February 11th| |Lil||Feb 1 2013, 09:58 AM| Don't care about Chloe/Taniel/Jen-Jen.
Don't care about Sami, really, but hoping that we get some good "SAMANTHA GENE!!"
Marlena Death-Stares out of it.
And "newfound" feelings.
Please.
If only.
STEFANO!!
STEFANO, STEFANO, STEFANO!!!!
:cheer: |Spoilers for the Week of February 11th · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|
*sigh* Fundamentalist community, let me pass on some advice to you I learned from the atheistic community: If you have set yourself on fire, do not run.
Okay?
Okay??
Please?
Look, D, you had two months to say to Harvard in private emails, "Im sorry, I shouldnt have been using that animation in my paid presentations.
I wont use it again.
I really do like 'Inner Life', though, and would love to use it in classroom presentations, from the BioVisions site, if that is acceptable."
I sat here, for two months, waiting for that to happen, anything to happen, and it didnt.
Two months, on your own terms, you could have written a similar post to yesterdays.
I would have given you the benefit of the doubt-- maybe you didnt know the credits werent visible to the audience, and I wouldnt have said a word beyond this, as its Harvards problem, not mine.
This would have been a funny joke to those of us involved in dealing with you people, but it would have been a PR non-issue for you.
But after you set yourself on fire, you didnt douse it out with a bucket of ice cold reality and accountability.
You ran.
And youre still running.
Why not just state "I screwed up.
Sorry everyone."
and move on?
Why the excuses?
Why the denial?
Why the passive language?
Why the vague words and cryptic capitalizations?
Why the writes and rewrites of your 'press release'?
We know it wasnt written of your own volition, or it would have been done *before* Harvard had to take action.
And, your behavior before this, regarding this issue, is not indicative of someone who made an innocent mistake.
Its weird.
So what with this frantic running?
Is the inability to say "I was wrong" a pathological feature of Creationists?
Or are you hiding something?
Or is it both?
Or is it more?
And now we get Casey weighing in on the issue, according to cre8id at AboveTopSecret.com-- PBS/NOVA online - Intelligent Design on trial: ...to my knowledge, Discovery Institute has neither authorized nor received nor is making use of any presentation that used that animation.
We have had nothing to do with creating or selling a DVD of that animation, nor do we have anything to do with placing that presentation on Google Video.I dont know what he is talking about with that last part, but the first part sounds similar to DIs claims post-Dover ("WE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH DOVER!").
Maybe Luskin is telling the truth.
Maybe this was a magic non-science Creation-friendly narration with convenient edits that AiG or ICR would have killed for... but only Dembski could find it... but he cant tell us where... and he didnt share it with anyone... and its subsequently disappeared from the Internet...
But that simply isnt what Ive been told.
Maybe this was all a silly Dembski mistake, blown out of proportion due to his decision to remain silent...
But what if we find more videos of more DI fellows, presenting this animation?
*shrug* If youve set yourself on fire, do not run, DI.
If youve done it, better admit it to Harvard now, apologize, and move on.
A novel two-step immunotherapy approach has shown clinically beneficial responses in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Following Lifestyle Recommendations Reduces Risk of Cancer Death People who follow the diet and lifestyle recommendations laid out by the WCRF and the AICR have a 20 percent reduced risk of dying from cancer.
UCSF Launches Social Networking Site for Patients and Families with Hereditary Cancers For Immediate Release May 14, 2013 UCSF Launches Social Networking Site for Patients and Families... Genomic Test May Help Guide Prostate Cancer Treatment The Oncotype DX® Prostate Cancer Test strongly predicts aggressiveness of dise...
Statins Linked to Lower Risk of Liver Cancer in Hepatitis C People infected with chronic hepatitis C are less likely to develop liver cancer if they are taking statins.
Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a type of targeted therapy that delivers radiation directly to cancer cells.... Urinary Incontinence Overview The urinary tract includes the kidneys, the ureters, the bladder, and the urethra.
The kidneys... Advanced Directives Living Wills Every competent adult has, in most cases, the freedom to accept or refuse medical treatment.... Caregivers What is Caregiving and Who are Caregivers?
Caregivers are individuals who provide care to chronically...
Chemotherapy for Older Patients: What You Should Know About the Risk of Infection As you may already know, chemotherapy works by attacking the rapidly dividing cells it finds in the body,... An ongoing series highlighting complementary therapies, adapted from The Complete Guide to Complementary... Clear and precise Moh...
By Eleanor Mayfield Michele Kelsey... Chemical Reaction Chemicals may be disrupting our hormones—and our health.
By Laurie Wertich Exposure to synthetic chemicals... College Kids Kick Cancer By Diana Price College kids and cancer—not two topics most of us would immediately connect.
And yet...
Cooking with Fruits and Vegetables In the introduction to Ripe: A Fresh, Colorful Approach to Fruits and Vegetables (Running Press, 2011;...
Annual meeting brings together cancer experts from around the world.
Kari Bohlke, ScD The 2011 Annual...
Bone Fractures in Breast Cancer Patients More Frequent with Femara than with Tamoxifen Researchers affiliated with the BIG I-98 Collaborative and International Breast Study Groups...
Single Treatment with High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Effective for Localized Prostate Cancer Researchers from McMaster University in Canada have reported that high-intensity focused... Marital Separation Impacts Cancer Survival Researchers from the University of Indiana and the Fox Chase Cancer Center... 2009 Oncolo...
Free the Cans!
Working Together to Reduce Waste In a blog about how people share, it’s worth the occasional reference to the bizarre ways that people DON’T SHARE.
Is it safe to say we live in a society that places great value on independence, private property, personal space, and privacy?
Even sometimes extreme value?
Is that why people at an 8-unit apartment building in Oakland, CA have separate caged stalls for eight separate trash cans?
I know it’s not nice to stare, but I walked by these incarcerated cans and could not help myself.
I returned with my camera, so that I could share my question with the world: Why can’t people share trash cans or a single dumpster?
Or, at the very least, why can’t the cans share driveway space?
The Zero Waste Movement has come to the Bay Area and it calls for a new use for these eight cages.
Here are my suggestions: - Turn two of those cages into compost bins.
Fill one with grass, leaves, and vegetable scraps, let it decompose for six months, then start filling the second bin in the meantime.
- Put in a green can, which is what Oakland uses to collect milk cartons, pizza boxes, yard trimmings, and all food to send it to the municipal composting facility.
If your city doesn’t do this yet, tell them it’s a great idea and they could be as cool and cutting edge as Oakland.
- Put in one or two recycling cans for glass, plastic, cardboard, paper, aluminum, etc.
- Put out a FREE STUFF box for unwanted clothing and household items.
The neighbors could sort through it each week, and later put it out on the curb for passers-by to explore.
Take what’s left to Goodwill or a comparable donation spot.
- Put in a few small bins for various items that can be recycled, such asbatteries and electronics, which can then be taken to an electronics recycling center every month or two.
Styrofoam can be brought to a local packaging store or ceramics business that accepts used packaging material.
Or, if you accumulate a bunch of plastic bags,take them to a store or to some other place that accepts used ones.
- Put in ONE trash can.
By the time you compost, recycle, re-use, redistribute, and take a few other measures to reduce your waste, you’ll have almost no trash each week.
- Install a bicycle rack or locked bicycle cage.
- With the leftover space, put in a container garden and a bench where neighbors can gather and chat.
A much more pleasant alternative to the garbage can jailhouse ambiance, wouldn’t you agree?
ORLANDO, Fla. — While the Rapid Recall Exchange, the 2-year-old industry recall portal, has signed up more than 600 manufacturer and retailer subscribers, it still lacks the “critical mass” of suppliers that would make it a primary source of recall information, according to trade association officials and retailers.
Manufacturers use the exchange to communicate timely and accurate product recall and withdrawal notifications to retailer and wholesaler headquarters, which in turn share the information with individual stores.
The exchange's retail membership represents 85% of U.S. grocery volume — including 21 of the 24 largest supermarket chains based in the United States — but it still lacks key suppliers, especially in the fresh food sectors, said Pat Walsh, senior vice president, industry relations, education and research for Food Marke...
Major food distributors in the exchange, including Kroger, Wegmans and Wakefern, have recently sent letters to their vendors explaining that the only way they will accept recall information is via the RRE, noted Brian Lynch, senior director of business and industry development for the Grocery Manufacturers Association,...
In an April letter posted on www.rapidrecallexchange.org, Kroger asked all of its suppliers to subscribe to the exchange by July 1.
Michael Roberson, director of corporate quality assurance for Publix Super Markets, Lakeland, Fla., said in the U Connect Live session that the chain is “disappointed” in the number of manufacturers using the Rapid Recall Exchange.
“Only 222 of our grocery suppliers are signed up, and more than 1,000 have not yet joined,” Roberson said.
“We need to have the entire food industry collaborating on the Rapid Recall Exchange.”
Last year, of the 300 recalls Publix experienced, fewer than 50 went through the RRE, he said, adding that industrywide only 15% of recalls were submitted to the RRE.
A total of 65 recalls have been issued through the exchange industrywide since its September 2009 launch.
For recalls that went through the RRE at Publix, Roberson observed “the absolute excellence in the information that was communicated,” including product GTINs (global trade identification numbers), the reason for the recall, and photos.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
38