Datasets:

techsachin
/

crisis-sitrep-eval

@@ -1,92 +1,94 @@
----
-license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
-language:
-- en
-pretty_name: "SitrepGap: Operational Completeness and Grounding of LLM Situation Reports"
-tags:
-- crisis-informatics
-- situation-reports
-- llm-evaluation
-- llm-as-a-judge
-- humanitarian
-size_categories:
-- 10K<n<100K
-configs:
-- config_name: judgements
-  data_files: per_judgement.csv
-  default: true
-- config_name: human_validation
-  data_files: tables/human_validation_pairs.csv
-- config_name: slot_coverage
-  data_files: tables/slot_coverage_by_judge_arm.csv
-- config_name: completeness_by_document
-  data_files: tables/completeness_by_document.csv
-- config_name: reliefweb_manifest
-  data_files: reliefweb_report_manifest.csv
-- config_name: humaid_manifest
-  data_files: humaid_source_manifest.csv
-- config_name: machine_report_manifest
-  data_files: machine_report_manifest.csv
-- config_name: matcher_audit
-  data_files: matcher_audit.csv
-- config_name: open_codes
-  data_files: schema_audit/open_codes.csv
-- config_name: clusters
-  data_files: schema_audit/clusters_summary.csv
----
-# crisis-sitrep-eval
-Evaluation resources for comparing LLM-generated and professional humanitarian situation
-reports (sitreps), from "Looking Complete Is Not Being Grounded: Evaluating LLM Sitreps Against
-Human-Authored Situation Reports" (LT4CPR Workshop @ AACL-IJCNLP 2026).
-- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18762
-- Code: https://github.com/techsachinkr/llm-sitrep-evaluation
-## Contents
-| File | What it holds |
-|---|---|
-| `frozen_schema.yaml` | The 15-slot information schema, with definitions and two synthetic examples per slot |
-| `per_judgement.csv` (`judgements`) | Slot-level judge verdicts (ABSENT / PARTIAL / PRESENT) for 121 professional and 261 LLM-generated reports across five disasters, without text |
-| `tables/human_validation_pairs.csv` (`human_validation`) | 100 blind human labels with the four judges' verdicts (Cyclone Idai) |
-| `tables/` | Every table behind the paper's numbers: completeness, slot coverage, figure grounding, source availability, metric correlations, sensitivity analyses |
-| `reliefweb_report_manifest.csv` | Titles, organisations, dates, URLs and hashes of the 125 ReliefWeb reports |
-| `humaid_source_manifest.csv` | HumAID tweet IDs and text hashes (76,484 rows) |
-| `machine_report_manifest.csv` | Request hash, output hash, call time and model ID for each of the 264 generations |
-| `prompts.json`, `measurement_spec.json`, `model_roles.csv`, `decoding_parameters.csv` | Prompts, measurement rules, models and decoding settings |
-| `schema_audit/open_codes.csv` (`open_codes`) | All 1,360 open codes by report (name, definition, confidence, cluster), without evidence spans |
-| `schema_audit/clusters_summary.csv` (`clusters`), `schema_audit/clusters.csv` | All 382 clusters (threshold .35), ranked, with the 25 candidates flagged and every member code |
-| `schema_audit/` (other files) | Induction sample, the 25 candidates, merge decisions and rationales, review record, frozen schema, and the embedding cache used for clustering |
-| `REPRODUCIBILITY.md` | How to re-run the analysis from these files |
-## What is not included
-No evidence spans from the open codes, no tweet text, no generated report text (generations can repeat personal data from crisis
-posts), and no ReliefWeb documents (copyright of the publishing organisations). Use the
-manifests to retrieve the sources and verify them against the hashes.
-## Limitations
-The schema was induced from 56 Cyclone Idai reports, 44 of them OCHA's, so it chiefly reflects
-OCHA reporting practice. The human validation used one annotator on Idai only. Judge labels are
-LLM outputs. HumAID is a labelled sample of English-language tweets, not social media at large.
-## Licence
-CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, inherited from HumAID (Alam et al., 2021) for the tweet-ID manifest.
-## Citation
-```bibtex
-@misc{kumar2026sitrepgap,
-  title         = {Looking Complete Is Not Being Grounded: Evaluating {LLM} Sitreps Against Human-Authored Situation Reports},
-  author        = {Kumar, Sachin},
-  year          = {2026},
-  eprint        = {2610.18762},
-  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
-  primaryClass  = {cs.CL},
-  url           = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18762}
-}
-```

+---
+language:
+- en
+license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
+size_categories:
+- 10K<n<100K
+pretty_name: 'SitrepGap: Operational Completeness and Grounding of LLM Situation Reports'
+task_categories:
+- text-classification
+tags:
+- crisis-informatics
+- situation-reports
+- llm-evaluation
+- llm-as-a-judge
+- humanitarian
+configs:
+- config_name: judgements
+  data_files: per_judgement.csv
+  default: true
+- config_name: human_validation
+  data_files: tables/human_validation_pairs.csv
+- config_name: slot_coverage
+  data_files: tables/slot_coverage_by_judge_arm.csv
+- config_name: completeness_by_document
+  data_files: tables/completeness_by_document.csv
+- config_name: reliefweb_manifest
+  data_files: reliefweb_report_manifest.csv
+- config_name: humaid_manifest
+  data_files: humaid_source_manifest.csv
+- config_name: machine_report_manifest
+  data_files: machine_report_manifest.csv
+- config_name: matcher_audit
+  data_files: matcher_audit.csv
+- config_name: open_codes
+  data_files: schema_audit/open_codes.csv
+- config_name: clusters
+  data_files: schema_audit/clusters_summary.csv
+---
+# crisis-sitrep-eval
+Evaluation resources for comparing LLM-generated and professional humanitarian situation
+reports (sitreps), from "Looking Complete Is Not Being Grounded: Evaluating LLM Sitreps Against
+Human-Authored Situation Reports" (LT4CPR Workshop @ AACL-IJCNLP 2026).
+- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18762
+- Code: https://github.com/techsachinkr/llm-sitrep-evaluation
+## Contents
+| File | What it holds |
+|---|---|
+| `frozen_schema.yaml` | The 15-slot information schema, with definitions and two synthetic examples per slot |
+| `per_judgement.csv` (`judgements`) | Slot-level judge verdicts (ABSENT / PARTIAL / PRESENT) for 121 professional and 261 LLM-generated reports across five disasters, without text |
+| `tables/human_validation_pairs.csv` (`human_validation`) | 100 blind human labels with the four judges' verdicts (Cyclone Idai) |
+| `tables/` | Every table behind the paper's numbers: completeness, slot coverage, figure grounding, source availability, metric correlations, sensitivity analyses |
+| `reliefweb_report_manifest.csv` | Titles, organisations, dates, URLs and hashes of the 125 ReliefWeb reports |
+| `humaid_source_manifest.csv` | HumAID tweet IDs and text hashes (76,484 rows) |
+| `machine_report_manifest.csv` | Request hash, output hash, call time and model ID for each of the 264 generations |
+| `prompts.json`, `measurement_spec.json`, `model_roles.csv`, `decoding_parameters.csv` | Prompts, measurement rules, models and decoding settings |
+| `schema_audit/open_codes.csv` (`open_codes`) | All 1,360 open codes by report (name, definition, confidence, cluster), without evidence spans |
+| `schema_audit/clusters_summary.csv` (`clusters`), `schema_audit/clusters.csv` | All 382 clusters (threshold .35), ranked, with the 25 candidates flagged and every member code |
+| `schema_audit/` (other files) | Induction sample, the 25 candidates, merge decisions and rationales, review record, frozen schema, and the embedding cache used for clustering |
+| `REPRODUCIBILITY.md` | How to re-run the analysis from these files |
+## What is not included
+No evidence spans from the open codes, no tweet text, no generated report text (generations can repeat personal data from crisis
+posts), and no ReliefWeb documents (copyright of the publishing organisations). Use the
+manifests to retrieve the sources and verify them against the hashes.
+## Limitations
+The schema was induced from 56 Cyclone Idai reports, 44 of them OCHA's, so it chiefly reflects
+OCHA reporting practice. The human validation used one annotator on Idai only. Judge labels are
+LLM outputs. HumAID is a labelled sample of English-language tweets, not social media at large.
+## Licence
+CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, inherited from HumAID (Alam et al., 2021) for the tweet-ID manifest.
+## Citation
+```bibtex
+@misc{kumar2026sitrepgap,
+  title         = {Looking Complete Is Not Being Grounded: Evaluating {LLM} Sitreps Against Human-Authored Situation Reports},
+  author        = {Kumar, Sachin},
+  year          = {2026},
+  eprint        = {2610.18762},
+  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
+  primaryClass  = {cs.CL},
+  url           = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18762}
+}
+```