jerzyk-bench / README.md
trenify's picture
docs: results on the published jerzyk-bench with basal and confidence intervals
bb73d74 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
9.47 kB
metadata
license: apache-2.0
language:
  - pl
task_categories:
  - text-classification
tags:
  - benchmark
  - decision-model
  - legal
  - administrative
  - polish
pretty_name: jerzyk-bench
size_categories:
  - n<1K
annotations_creators:
  - machine-generated
language_creators:
  - machine-generated
  - found
multilinguality:
  - monolingual
configs:
  - config_name: sad
    default: true
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sad_test.jsonl
      - split: validation
        path: data/sad_dev.jsonl
  - config_name: adm
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/adm_test.jsonl
      - split: validation
        path: data/adm_dev.jsonl
  - config_name: ksieg
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/ksieg_test.jsonl
      - split: validation
        path: data/ksieg_dev.jsonl
  - config_name: email
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/email_test.jsonl
      - split: validation
        path: data/email_dev.jsonl
  - config_name: sad_real
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sad_real_test.jsonl
      - split: validation
        path: data/sad_real_dev.jsonl
  - config_name: sad_real_fragmenty
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sad_real_fragmenty_test.jsonl
  - config_name: adm_real
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/adm_real_test.jsonl

jerzyk-bench

A Polish benchmark for decision models (typed questions with calibrated answers) on incoming correspondence: court letters, administrative notices, accounting documents and customer e-mails, plus real court rulings and real public notices.

🇵🇱 Polski benchmark modeli decyzyjnych dla korespondencji: pisma sądowe, urzędowe, księgowe i e-maile klientów, plus prawdziwe orzeczenia i obwieszczenia urzędów. Pytania: rodzaj pisma, czy biegnie termin, pilność, dział.

Files

File Documents Source Labels
sad_test, adm_test, ksieg_test 120 each generated by Bielik 11B v3 from recipes by construction, automatically checked
email_test 120 written by Claude (Anthropic) from recipes by construction, rule-checked, rules from SPEC.md
sad_dev, adm_dev, ksieg_dev, email_dev 30 each as above as above
sad_real_test 89 real court rulings, SAOS 2024–2026 (already anonymised) document type from SAOS metadata
sad_real_fragmenty_test 31 SAOS texts that start mid-text, with no header reported separately (type often undecidable)
sad_real_dev 120 SAOS 2025–2026, disjoint from test document type from metadata
adm_real_test 56 real public notices from 10 offices (samorzad.gov.pl), de-duplicated by template, personal data replaced with [OSOBA]/[ADRES] labelled by Claude following SPEC.md, checked by two blind re-labellings and adjudicated; not human-reviewed

Each line: id, domain, split, state (document text), questions (typed questions in the TypeSafe Jev systemone format), expected (gold answers), source (where applicable), author, labels and note.

Questions

  • rodzaj / dzial / kategoria_kosztu: choice from a fixed list.
  • termin: yes/no. Does a deadline for the recipient's action run?
  • pilnosc: score 0–3, from the deadline length counted from the letter date: 0 nothing to do, 1 no deadline or > 14 days, 2 8–14 days, 3 ≤ 7 days or immediately. E-mails have their own scale: blocked customer = 2; damage, threat of court or "today" = 3.
  • E-mail: rezygnacja (terminates service or account; a single-purchase return does not count), zdenerwowany (upset; a threat of court or media counts).

Every rule and every decision taken while building the set is listed in docs/SPEC.md in the code repository.

Configurations on the Hub: sad, adm, ksieg, email (generated; test and validation = dev), sad_real (test, validation), sad_real_fragmenty, adm_real. Domain codes: sad court, adm administrative, ksieg accounting, email customer e-mail.

from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("trenify/jerzyk-bench", "adm_real", split="test")

Personal data

  • Real court rulings come from SAOS, where parties are already anonymised. Before publication we also replaced names of judges, prosecutors and court clerks with [SĘDZIA], [OSOBA] and [PROTOKOLANT] (scripts/anonymize_rulings.py).
  • Real public notices are official documents published by the offices. Names and addresses of private persons were replaced with [OSOBA] and [ADRES]. Names of offices, their official contact details and parcel numbers were kept.
  • Generated documents use invented names and companies. PESEL numbers, phone numbers and e-mail domains were masked.
  • Check before publication. All 296 real documents were then read in full by two independent automated read-throughs (Claude Opus and Claude Sonnet) looking for remaining personal data; 11 leaks were found and masked (MANUAL_FIXES in scripts/anonymize_rulings.py). Names of authors of cited legal commentaries were kept, as published literature. This was not a manual human review.
  • Anonymisation can still miss something. If you find personal data in this dataset, write to contact@trenify.org with the document id (please do not quote it in public discussions), and we will remove it.
  • Data protection and copyright requests (for example from a person a document concerns): contact@trenify.org.

Metrics

Accuracy per question, mean over domains, ±1 accuracy and MAE for scores, Brier score for yes/no, ECE (15 bins), and latency. See scripts/evaluate.py in the repository. Do not train on the test split. Use dev for model selection and calibration.

Results

Generated test set (480 documents) — accuracy (%)

Question Jerzyk 1.0 (322M) basal-2.0-mini (1.5B) Qwen3 8B Bielik 11B v3
Administrative: urgency 77.5 61.7 41.7 54.2
Administrative: document_type 90.0 93.3 90.8 95.0
Administrative: deadline 82.5 79.2 83.3 83.3
Customer e-mail: department 93.3 88.3 89.2 89.2
Customer e-mail: urgency 79.2 75.0 70.0 80.0
Customer e-mail: cancellation 99.2 100.0 97.5 96.7
Customer e-mail: upset 91.7 90.8 77.5 85.8
Accounting: cost_category 97.5 95.0 85.8 75.8
Accounting: urgency 64.2 35.8 45.8 62.5
Accounting: document_type 94.2 91.7 95.8 95.8
Accounting: deadline 85.8 95.8 93.3 76.7
Court: urgency 80.8 42.5 40.0 54.2
Court: document_type 84.2 96.7 94.2 92.5
Court: deadline 93.3 84.2 82.5 82.5
Mean over domains 86.4 80.2 77.0 79.9

Real documents (89 court rulings + 56 administrative notices) — accuracy (%), 95% confidence interval in brackets

Question Jerzyk 1.0 (322M) basal-2.0-mini (1.5B) Qwen3 8B Bielik 11B v3
Admin. notices (real): urgency 58.9 (46–71) 32.1 (21–45) 50.0 (37–63) 30.4 (20–43)
Admin. notices (real): document_type 85.7 (74–93) 78.6 (66–87) 83.9 (72–91) 85.7 (74–93)
Admin. notices (real): deadline 71.4 (58–82) 75.0 (62–84) 64.3 (51–76) 78.6 (66–87)
Court rulings (real): document_type 98.9 (94–100) 94.4 (88–98) 100.0 (96–100) 100.0 (96–100)
Mean over domains 85.5 78.1 83.0 82.5
Jerzyk 1.0 (322M) basal-2.0-mini (1.5B) Qwen3 8B Bielik 11B v3
ECE, real documents (lower = better) 0.106 0.112 0.191 0.154
Median latency per document (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop GPU) 0.02 s 1.13 s (Apple M1, MLX) 0.24 s 0.41 s

Models compared: Jerzyk 1.0 (calibrated); basal-2.0-mini (MLX 8-bit, native /v1/systemone); Qwen3 8B and Bielik 11B v3.0 Instruct (GGUF Q4_K_M in llama.cpp, zero-shot, answer chosen from option log-probabilities). Mean over domains averages the questions of each domain first, then the domains, so every domain counts equally.

Caveats

  • The generated sets use recipes, so their language is cleaner than real mail. Report real and generated results separately.
  • The test documents for court, administrative and accounting were written by Bielik 11B, which may favour Bielik slightly.
  • Urgency and deadline conventions are those of SPEC.md. A model that has not seen them is evaluated zero-shot.

About

Jerzyk and jerzyk-bench are published by Fundacja Trenify (Trenify Foundation), a Polish non-profit foundation. Issues and pull requests are welcome on GitHub. Contact: contact@trenify.org (also for security, personal-data and copyright reports).

Citation

@misc{jerzykbench2026,
  title        = {jerzyk-bench: a Polish benchmark for decision models on official correspondence},
  author       = {{Fundacja Trenify}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/trenify/jerzyk-bench}}
}

License

Apache 2.0. Court rulings (SAOS) and public notices are official documents (art. 4 of the Polish Copyright Act). Generated documents use invented names and data.