Classification Scripts
Text classification on HF Jobs: label a dataset with a model that needs no training, or train your own classifier from labelled examples.
If you have seen Jev and other "System One" models: the
models these scripts train are small, open versions of the same idea. They read a piece of data and
return a label with a probability, and you can train one on your own labels. For example, this
demo suggests task tags for any Hub
dataset; its model was fine-tuned with train-gliner2.py in 17 minutes.
To try it on your own account, this command fine-tunes a classifier for British Library book titles
(Fiction / Non-fiction). Training takes about 2 minutes on a t4-small and costs about $0.02.
Accuracy goes from 0.767 zero-shot to 0.907 fine-tuned. You get a private model repo, and its card
shows both scores next to the majority-class baseline. Copy and paste it as it is: the model goes
to your own account.
hf jobs uv run --flavor t4-small --timeout 1h --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-gliner2.py \
biglam/blbooksgenre gliner2-blbooks-genre \
--dataset-config title_genre_classifiction --text-column title
You need the hf CLI, signed in, and Jobs credit: see the Jobs quickstart.
| Script | What it does |
|---|---|
classify-gliner2.py |
Label a dataset with GLiNER2: zero-shot from label names, or with a train-gliner2.py model |
train-gliner2.py |
Fine-tune GLiNER2, a small model (74M–287M) that already classifies zero-shot, and report the zero-shot score next to the fine-tuned one |
train-setfit.py |
Few-shot train a classifier from 8-64 labels per class with SetFit — runs on CPU or GPU |
train-classifier.py |
Fine-tune an encoder into a classifier (default: LFM2.5-Encoder-350M) and push it to the Hub |
classify-dataset.py |
Zero-shot classify a dataset with an instruction LLM (SmolLM3 + vLLM, structured outputs) |
classify-dataset-sglang.py |
Zero-shot variant on SGLang (reasoning-aware <think> models) |
Pick by how many labels you have:
| Labels you have | Use | Hardware |
|---|---|---|
| none | classify-gliner2.py --labels ... for a cheap first pass; classify-dataset.py when the task needs an LLM's reasoning |
small GPU (CPU works at ~1.4 rows/s); GPU |
| ~8-64 per class | train-setfit.py |
CPU supported; GPU for faster training |
| a few hundred to a few thousand | train-gliner2.py, which also shows you what zero-shot already gets |
small GPU (t4-small) |
| a few thousand or more | train-classifier.py |
GPU |
The rungs chain: bootstrap labels with classify-gliner2.py or classify-dataset.py, review them,
then train a small dedicated model on what you kept. Each rung is one command, so you can move up
as you collect more labels.
Zero-shot first, then fine-tune (GLiNER2)
Label a dataset with your own list of labels, see how far zero-shot gets you, then fine-tune a small model on your labels, in minutes and for a few cents on one GPU. The result is a model that returns a label and a probability for every row, and is small enough to run on a CPU.
GLiNER2 (models from Fastino) is a small encoder that reads the label names
as part of its input, so it classifies with no training at all, and fine-tuning teaches it what
your labels mean in your data. (For entity extraction with the original GLiNER library, see
uv-scripts/gliner.) Two scripts:
train-gliner2.pyscores the base model zero-shot, fine-tunes it on your labels, and scores it again on the same held-out rows. The model card reports both scores next to the majority-class baseline.classify-gliner2.pylabels a whole dataset. Pass--labelsfor zero-shot, or--modelwith atrain-gliner2.pyoutput; the tasks and labels are read from the model repo. Labels are passed as separate words; quote a label with spaces:--labels World Sports Business "Science and technology". A fine-tuned model is passed by name:--model gliner2-blbooks-genre. A name on its own means your account; useorg/namefor an organisation.
Quick start
# fine-tune: British Library book titles -> Fiction / Non-fiction
hf jobs uv run --flavor t4-small --timeout 1h --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-gliner2.py \
biglam/blbooksgenre gliner2-blbooks-genre \
--dataset-config title_genre_classifiction --text-column title
# label a dataset with that model
hf jobs uv run --flavor t4-small --timeout 1h --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/classify-gliner2.py \
biglam/blbooksgenre blbooks-genre-predictions \
--dataset-config title_genre_classifiction --text-column title --model gliner2-blbooks-genre
# or skip training: zero-shot from label names
hf jobs uv run --flavor t4-small --timeout 1h --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/classify-gliner2.py \
fancyzhx/ag_news ag-news-topics --split test \
--labels World Sports Business "Science and technology" --task-name topic
The second command labels the same rows the model was trained on, so it shows the workflow, not
the model's accuracy; the held-out scores are on the model card. For real use, point it at data
the model has not seen. Outputs are private by default (--public to opt out).
These commands use the default base model, fastino/gliner2.5-multi-v1 (multilingual). For
English text, --base-model fastino/gliner2.5-base-v1 is smaller and faster;
gliner2.5-small-v1 is the fastest and loses about 4 points on the 52-tag example. Sizes and speeds: Choosing a model size.
Results
Fine-tuning beat zero-shot on every dataset below. The public-dataset runs took 2 to 30 minutes of training on one GPU and cost $0.01 to $0.20; the 52-tag example took 17 minutes and about $1.50.
| Dataset | Task | Labels | Train rows × epochs | Train time | Train cost | Metric | Majority floor | Zero-shot | Fine-tuned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
biglam/blbooksgenre (book titles) |
single-label | 2 | 1,562 × 5 | 141s | $0.02 | accuracy | 0.747 | 0.767 (0.753–0.782) | 0.907 (0.897–0.925) |
fancyzhx/ag_news |
single-label | 4 | 2,000 × 2 | 125s | $0.01 | accuracy | 0.268 | 0.718 | 0.852 |
google-research-datasets/go_emotions |
multi-label | 28 | 2,000 × 2 | 216s | $0.02 | micro F1 | — | 0.265 | 0.464 |
SetFit/TREC-QC, two tasks in one model |
single-label ×2 | 6 + 50 | 5,452 × 3 | 1,761s | $0.20 | accuracy | 0.276 / 0.246 | 0.542 / 0.468 | 0.954 / 0.876 |
same, on a10g-small, default batch size, bf16 |
single-label ×2 | 6 + 50 | 5,452 × 3 | 509s | $0.14 | accuracy | 0.276 / 0.246 | not run | 0.944 / 0.872 |
stanfordnlp/imdb (reviews; 15% truncated at 2,000 characters) |
single-label | 2 | 1,000 × 1 | 122s | $0.01 | accuracy | 0.500 | 0.777 | 0.840 |
Hub dataset task tags (worked example), --base-model fastino/gliner2.5-base-v1 --label-augmentation off, on rtx-pro-6000 |
single-label choice from a fixed set | 52 | 16,000 × 5 | 17 min | ~$1.50 | top-1 in the owner's tags | 0.320 (always "text-generation") | 0.102 | 0.690 (2 seeds: 0.695 / 0.686) |
Most rows are single, deliberately small runs that test the script, not tuned results. Seed ranges, out-of-memory history and GPU comparisons are in GLINER2-NOTES.md.
Larger or fixed label sets
For tens of labels scored together (a taxonomy, a fixed tag list), or data in a bucket, see
Larger or fixed label sets in the notes:
--labels-file, --label-augmentation off, local --train-file/--eval-file and --export-predictions.
Worked example: tagging Hub datasets
A GLiNER2.5-base model fine-tuned with this script on 16,000 Hub datasets suggests task tags for a dataset from its column names and first row, among the 52 tags the Hub offers. Its first suggestion matches one of the owner's tags 69% of the time on 3,000 newer datasets from owners it never saw. Owners' tags are a noisy target: in a hand-checked sample, about 1 in 10 datasets was missing a tag that fits.
Try the demo: paste a dataset id and see the suggested tags, the owner's tags and the exact text the model read. On a free 2-vCPU Space one prediction takes about 0.7–1 s. Model · Notes on how it was trained
Good to know
- Single-label and multi-label are auto-detected from the label column; repeat
--label-columnto train several tasks in one model. - Label names are part of the prompt. Real names (
Fiction,Sports) work; integer codes make zero-shot meaningless. - Out of GPU memory, it restarts at a smaller batch size and stops before pushing if even batch size 1 fails. Many labels or long texts want an
a10g-small. - Always pass
--timeout. OlderhfCLIs ignore the scripts'[tool.hf-jobs]header and stop the Job after 30 minutes.
More behaviour details, tested commands, findings and dead ends: GLINER2-NOTES.md.
Few-shot with SetFit (train-setfit.py)
An alternative when you have only a handful of labelled examples per class (8-64) and want a sentence-transformer model.
Trains a SetFit classifier from a handful of labelled examples per class. SetFit finetunes a sentence-transformer body on contrastive pairs, then fits a logistic regression head on the resulting embeddings.
Runs on CPU or GPU. CPU is practical for small few-shot experiments. Use a GPU for faster training, particularly with larger models, longer texts or more classes. The same model and training settings work on either; the recipe uses the available accelerator automatically.
# 8 labels per class, on CPU
hf jobs uv run --flavor cpu-basic --timeout 20m --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-setfit.py \
fancyzhx/ag_news username/ag-news-setfit --num-samples 8
# Same model and training settings on a GPU for faster training
hf jobs uv run --flavor t4-small --timeout 20m --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-setfit.py \
fancyzhx/ag_news username/ag-news-setfit-gpu --num-samples 8
Measured
8 labels per class, seed 42, evaluated on each dataset's own held-out split (capped at 500 examples, 1000 for banking77):
| Dataset | Classes | Labels used | Body | Flavor | Training | Accuracy | Macro F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SetFit/enron_spam |
2 | 16 | MiniLM-L6 | cpu-basic |
78s | 0.924 | 0.924 |
fancyzhx/ag_news |
4 | 32 | MiniLM-L6 | cpu-basic |
118s | 0.804 | 0.807 |
legacy-datasets/banking77 |
77 | 616 | MiniLM-L6 | t4-small |
18s | 0.803 | 0.789 |
dair-ai/emotion |
6 | 48 | MiniLM-L6 | cpu-basic |
216s | 0.370 | 0.325 |
Single seed each — these do not rank models or predict your dataset. Few-shot results vary substantially with which examples happen to get sampled; SetFit's own benchmarks report mean and standard deviation across ten seeds for exactly this reason. Run your own task before trusting any of these numbers.
Good to know
- Default body:
all-MiniLM-L6-v2(22M), chosen for CPU speed. Swap it with--body-model; set--max-seq-lengthwithin its context window and add any task prefix it needs yourself. See Choosing another body or longer context. - Single-label only. A multi-label column exits with a pointer to
train-classifier.py. - Beat more than the majority baseline. Every run reports it, but
emotionbeat it by under 2 points; compare with TF-IDF plus logistic regression or zero-shot on the same rows. See Compare more than the majority baseline. - Many classes: watch the pair count. Pairs grow with the square of the training-set size; at 77 classes use
--sampling-strategy undersampling. See Many classes. - It refuses runs projected above
--max-minutes(default 60). Onbiglam/hansard_speech(2.7M speeches, 28 parties) it refused to train and produced no score, and the worked failure shows why. - Load it with
SetFitModel.from_pretrained(repo), notAutoModelForSequenceClassification: a SetFit model is a sentence-transformer body plus a scikit-learn head.
Evaluation split, metrics, dropped rows and --private: SETFIT-NOTES.md.
Fine-tune a classifier (train-classifier.py)
Fine-tunes a text-classification encoder on any Hub dataset and pushes the trained model back to the Hub — download, train, evaluate, push, and reload-verify in one job.
- Default model: LiquidAI/LFM2.5-Encoder-350M — a bidirectional encoder that LiquidAI reports beats ModernBERT-base on GLUE/SuperGLUE, and handles 8,192-token documents. Any Hub encoder works via
--model(ModernBERT, BERT, DeBERTa, …). - Single-label and multi-label, auto-detected from the label column (
ClassLabel/string/int → cross-entropy; list of labels → BCE + per-label threshold tuning). - Round-trippable artifacts: standard architectures produce standard models; encoders without a classification head (like LFM2.5) get a generic mean-pooling head pushed as custom code, so
AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(..., trust_remote_code=True)always works.
# single-label (ag_news has a ClassLabel column)
hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-small --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-classifier.py \
fancyzhx/ag_news username/news-classifier
# multi-label (go_emotions has a list-of-labels column)
hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-small --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-classifier.py \
google-research-datasets/go_emotions username/emotion-classifier --label-column labels
Key options: --model, --max-length (512 default; up to 8192 with
--gradient-checkpointing and a small --batch-size on a10g/a100), --epochs, --lr,
--batch-size, --max-samples (smoke runs), --eval-split (auto-detects
validation/test, or holds out 10% of train). Run uv run train-classifier.py --help for all.
Worked example: classify dataset cards by task
davanstrien/dataset-cards-with-task-categories
contains 21k Hub dataset cards (frontmatter stripped) labelled with their task_categories
metadata — a real multi-label task over long documents:
hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-small --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/train-classifier.py \
davanstrien/dataset-cards-with-task-categories username/dataset-card-task-classifier \
--label-column labels --max-length 1024 --batch-size 8 --grad-accum 2
The output model predicts likely task categories from a card's prose — e.g. for suggesting metadata on datasets that lack it.
Training a standard encoder instead
--model answerdotai/ModernBERT-base (or any encoder with a native classification head)
produces a plain, vLLM-servable model — pair it with
uv-scripts/vllm's
classify-dataset.py for large-scale batch inference with the model you just trained.
Zero-shot classification (classify-dataset.py)
Label a dataset with an instruction LLM and no training data. You give a list of labels; the
model picks one per row, and guided decoding (structured outputs) makes sure every answer is one
of your labels. The default model is
HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B; any instruction
model works via --model. The result is your dataset with a new classification column.
Two scripts do this. classify-dataset.py runs on vLLM and is the one to start with.
classify-dataset-sglang.py runs the same task on SGLang, for reasoning models that write
<think> traces; its options differ (--reasoning, --save-reasoning, --batch-size,
--grammar-backend), so check its --help.
Quick start
A GPU is required. Run on Jobs with the vLLM image:
hf jobs uv run --flavor l4x1 --image vllm/vllm-openai:latest --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/classify-dataset.py \
--input-dataset stanfordnlp/imdb \
--column text \
--labels "positive,negative" \
--output-dataset username/imdb-classified \
--max-samples 100 --shuffle
--max-samples with --shuffle takes a random sample, which matters for datasets sorted by
date or label. Drop both to label the whole split.
With reasoning and label descriptions
hf jobs uv run --flavor l4x1 --image vllm/vllm-openai:latest --secrets HF_TOKEN \
https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/classification/raw/main/classify-dataset.py \
--input-dataset user/support-tickets \
--column content \
--labels "bug,feature_request,question,other" \
--label-descriptions "bug:code or product not working as expected,feature_request:asking for new functionality,question:seeking help or clarification,other:general comments or feedback" \
--enable-reasoning \
--output-dataset username/tickets-classified
With --enable-reasoning the model thinks step by step before it answers, and the output also
has reasoning and parsing_success columns. Reasoning mode turns off structured outputs: the
model must end with {"label": "..."}, and rows where that cannot be parsed are marked in
parsing_success. It is slower, but you can read why each label was chosen.
Options
| Option | What it does |
|---|---|
--model |
Model to use (default HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B) |
--label-descriptions |
label:description,... pairs that tell the model what each label means |
--enable-reasoning |
Think before answering; adds reasoning and parsing_success columns |
--split |
Split to process (default train) |
--max-samples |
Label only the first N rows (or N random rows with --shuffle) |
--shuffle, --shuffle-seed |
Shuffle before --max-samples (seed default 42) |
Run uv run classify-dataset.py --help for all options.
Good to know
- Speed: about 50-100 texts/second for SmolLM3-3B on an A10, and 20-50 for 7B models.
l4x1is a good start; usea10g-largeor larger for 7B+ models or out-of-memory errors. - Text handling: texts shorter than 3 characters and empty values are skipped; texts are truncated to 4,000 characters.
- Label names matter. Use clear, distinct names, add
--label-descriptionswhen names are ambiguous, and try a larger model for nuanced tasks. - vLLM version:
ImportError: cannot import name GuidedDecodingParamsmeans the vLLM version does not match; the script requiresvllm>=0.6.6.
- Downloads last month
- 168