yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-v1
Text Classification • 0.1B • Updated • 1
id string | language string | category string | domain string | subdomain string | request string | state string | context string | candidate_actions string | gold_actions list | no_action bool | metadata string | provenance string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1-hard-0000000 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | The maintenance-parts request sitting in my queue is under my signing limit — get it moving so the buyer can cut the order. | {"amount": 18400, "po_created": false, "requisition_id": "REQ-2291", "status": "PENDING_APPROVAL", "user_approval_limit": 25000, "user_role": "approver_delegate"} | {"budget": "cleared for maintenance category", "buyer_group": "Retail", "channel": "web"} | [{"description": "Send a requisition in DRAFT into the approval queue for the first time.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "procurement.requisition.submit"}, {"description": "Record an approval decision on a PENDING_APPROVAL requisition within the approver's limit, releasing it to the buyer for PO ... | [
"procurement.requisition.approve"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000001 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | The part number on that pending request has been superseded — send it back to the requester so they can swap it in and send it up again. | {"flagged_line": 2, "issue": "superseded_part_number", "requisition_id": "REQ-2201", "status": "PENDING_APPROVAL", "user_role": "approver"} | {"policy": "approvers may not edit requester lines; return-to-draft is the correction path"} | [{"description": "Return a PENDING_APPROVAL requisition to the requester as DRAFT for corrections, preserving all prior edits for resubmission.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "procurement.requisition.return_to_requester"}, {"description": "Decline the requisition terminally with a reason; no resu... | [
"procurement.requisition.return_to_requester"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000002 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | My project slipped to Q3 — pull my hardware request back before anyone signs off on it. | {"po_created": false, "requester_is_current_user": true, "requisition_id": "REQ-5510", "status": "SUBMITTED", "user_role": "requester"} | {"approver_action_pending": true, "channel": "web"} | [{"description": "Requester withdraws a submitted or approved requisition before PO creation, no approver signature required.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.requisition.cancel"}, {"description": "Approver-side decision declining the requisition with a reason.", "domain": "Procureme... | [
"procurement.requisition.cancel"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000003 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | Dana is out until next week and this blows the approval SLA tonight — move it to Marco; he is her designated cover with the same limit. | {"amount": 21000, "cover_approver": "Marco", "cover_approver_limit": 25000, "current_approver": "Dana (on leave)", "requisition_id": "REQ-3388", "sla_breach_in_hours": 6, "status": "PENDING_APPROVAL", "user_role": "requester"} | {"delegation_matrix": "Marco listed as same-level cover"} | [{"description": "Move a pending approval to a different qualified approver at the same authority level.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "procurement.requisition.reassign"}, {"description": "Push a pending requisition to a higher approval level, typically for limit overflow or dispute.", "domain":... | [
"procurement.requisition.reassign"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000004 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | The plant equipment request is above my signing authority — pass it up the chain so it does not stall in my queue. | {"amount": 82000, "requisition_id": "REQ-1207", "status": "PENDING_APPROVAL", "user_approval_limit": 50000, "user_role": "approver"} | {"policy": "approvers may not approve above their limit; next level is Director"} | [{"description": "Route a pending requisition to the next higher approval level when the amount exceeds the current approver's limit.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "procurement.requisition.escalate"}, {"description": "Record approval within the approver's own signing limit.", "domain": "Procurem... | [
"procurement.requisition.escalate"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000005 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | Before the buyer cuts the order, move the needed-by date on my approved request out to March 8 — same lines, same amounts. | {"current_needed_by": "2025-02-14", "po_created": false, "requisition_id": "REQ-4402", "status": "APPROVED", "target_needed_by": "2025-03-08", "user_role": "requester"} | {"note": "APPROVED-but-unconverted requisitions remain editable by the requester with light re-review"} | [{"description": "Modify lines or dates on a requisition that is APPROVED but not yet converted to a PO, triggering light re-review.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "procurement.requisition.update"}, {"description": "Generate a purchase order from an approved requisition.", "domain": "Procurement... | [
"procurement.requisition.update"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000007 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Purchase Orders | Everything on PO-3312 has been delivered and the invoices are settled — wrap it up so it stops showing in open commitments. | {"invoice_status": "matched and paid", "open_balance": 0, "po_number": "PO-3312", "receipt_status": "all lines fully received", "status": "ISSUED"} | {"period_end": "month close in progress"} | [{"description": "Perform final closeout of a PO whose lines are fully received and financials reconciled, removing it from open commitments.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.po.close"}, {"description": "Terminate unfulfilled or unconfirmed lines on a PO that will not be delivered.",... | [
"procurement.po.close"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000008 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Purchase Orders | The supplier discontinued the item on the last line and the rest already arrived — kill the outstanding part so finance stops accruing it. | {"accrual_flag": true, "line_3": "unfulfilled; item discontinued by vendor", "lines_1_2": "fully received", "po_number": "PO-5567", "status": "ISSUED"} | {"finance_note": "accruals auto-post while PO lines remain open"} | [{"description": "Terminate the unfulfilled remainder of a PO that the vendor will never deliver.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.po.cancel"}, {"description": "Close out a PO only after all lines are received and financials settled.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "n... | [
"procurement.po.cancel"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000010 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Purchase Orders | We can meet the dates and quantities on this new order from the buyer — register our acceptance in the supplier portal. | {"po_number": "PO-8823", "status": "ISSUED", "user_role": "supplier", "vendor_acknowledged": false} | {"channel": "supplier_portal", "sla": "acknowledgment expected within 48 hours"} | [{"description": "Supplier records formal acceptance of an issued PO, confirming dates and quantities to the buyer.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "NOTIFY", "name": "procurement.po.acknowledge"}, {"description": "Issue a change order adjusting PO quantity, date, or price.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPD... | [
"procurement.po.acknowledge"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000011 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Purchase Orders | Four days and the supplier still has not accepted PO-9014 — give them a nudge. | {"days_since_issue": 4, "po_number": "PO-9014", "status": "ISSUED", "user_role": "buyer", "vendor_acknowledged": false} | {"acknowledgment_sla_days": 2} | [{"description": "Resend an acknowledgment reminder to the vendor for an issued PO that remains unaccepted.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "NOTIFY", "name": "procurement.po.remind"}, {"description": "Supplier-side action recording acceptance of the PO.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "NOTIFY", "name": "procu... | [
"procurement.po.remind"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000012 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Purchase Orders | Which orders with Meridian Components still carry open balances going into April? List them with the remaining amounts. | {"open_pos_for_vendor": 7, "period": "Q1 close", "user_role": "buyer", "vendor": "Meridian Components"} | {"purpose": "quarter-end open commitment review"} | [{"description": "Query purchase orders by vendor, status, or open balance and return the matching list with remaining amounts.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "SEARCH", "name": "procurement.po.search"}, {"description": "Close out a fully received and settled PO.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "na... | [
"procurement.po.search"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000013 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Vendor Management | Their insurance certificate lapsed yesterday — take them off the active roster until it is renewed, but keep the full record and history. | {"insurance_certificate": "expired 1 day ago", "policy": "expired certificate blocks active sourcing; records must be retained", "status": "ACTIVE", "vendor_id": "V-2205"} | {"compliance_check": "automatic certificate monitoring"} | [{"description": "Suspend a vendor from active transactions and sourcing while retaining the complete record and history.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.vendor.deactivate"}, {"description": "Edit vendor master data fields such as contacts, addresses, or payment terms.", "domain": "... | [
"procurement.vendor.deactivate"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000014 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Vendor Management | Going forward, Priya's team runs this supplier account day to day — make her the owner of record in the vendor file. | {"current_owner": "transitioning out", "status": "ACTIVE", "target_owner": "Priya", "user_role": "category_manager", "vendor_id": "V-1180"} | {"note": "ownership field drives task routing for this vendor"} | [{"description": "Set the responsible owner of record on a vendor profile, routing day-to-day tasks to that owner.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "procurement.vendor.assign_owner"}, {"description": "Raise an unresolved vendor issue to category management for intervention.", "domain": "Procurement... | [
"procurement.vendor.assign_owner"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000015 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Vendor Management | The renewed certificate arrived and compliance verified it — put them back on the active sourcing roster. | {"new_certificate": "received and verified", "status": "SUSPENDED", "suspension_reason": "insurance certificate expired", "vendor_id": "V-2205"} | {"linked_event": "suspension logged by certificate monitoring"} | [{"description": "Lift an existing suspension and return the vendor to ACTIVE sourcing status.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.vendor.reinstate"}, {"description": "Edit vendor master data fields such as contacts or payment terms.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPDATE", "name"... | [
"procurement.vendor.reinstate"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000016 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Vendor Management | After the acquisition there are two master records for the same supplier — combine them into one, keeping both payment histories. | {"duplicate_confirmed": true, "payment_history": "exists on both records", "vendor_ids": ["V-1180", "V-1181"]} | {"policy": "dedupe requires merge processing with history consolidation"} | [{"description": "Register a brand-new vendor record and start onboarding from scratch.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "CREATE", "name": "procurement.vendor.create"}, {"description": "Edit fields on a single existing vendor record; does not combine records or histories.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPDAT... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000017 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Invoice Processing | The invoice bills 120 units but the dock only logged 100 — hold the payment and push back on the quantity. | {"billed_qty": 120, "invoice_id": "INV-5521", "match_status": "QTY_VARIANCE", "payment_status": "HELD", "po_qty": 120, "received_qty": 100} | {"vendor": "long-standing supplier, first variance"} | [{"description": "Open a formal quantity or price dispute with the vendor, keeping the invoice blocked from payment until resolved.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.invoice.dispute"}, {"description": "Release the invoice to the scheduled payment run after match pass.", "domain": "Pro... | [
"procurement.invoice.dispute"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000019 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Invoice Processing | Pricing drifted up 1.8 percent — that is inside the tolerance band, so clear it for the payment run. | {"invoice_id": "INV-6712", "match_status": "PASS_WITH_TOLERANCE", "price_variance_pct": 1.8, "tolerance_pct": 2.0} | {"note": "user is invoice approver, not treasury"} | [{"description": "Release a match-passed invoice into the next scheduled payment run.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.invoice.approve"}, {"description": "Execute immediate out-of-cycle payment of the invoice outside the scheduled run.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", ... | [
"procurement.invoice.approve"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000020 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Invoice Processing | Approval is already done on INV-8890 — execute the payment now, in today's run. | {"approval_status": "APPROVED", "invoice_id": "INV-8890", "match_status": "PASS", "payment_status": "NOT_PAID"} | {"treasury_cutoff": "today 16:00"} | [{"description": "Release an approved-eligible invoice into the scheduled payment run.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.invoice.approve"}, {"description": "Open a formal dispute with the vendor and block payment.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.in... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000021 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Sourcing Events (RFQ) | Scores are in and sourcing signed off — hand the business to the Berlin supplier. | {"award_approval": "complete", "bids_received": 3, "recommended_bid": "Bid B - Berlin supplier", "rfq_id": "RFQ-902", "status": "CLOSED"} | {"note": "losing bidders must be notified automatically on decision"} | [{"description": "Award a closed, evaluated sourcing event to the selected bid and notify all participants of the outcome.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.rfq.award"}, {"description": "Move the submission deadline of an OPEN event to a later date.", "domain": "Procurement", "family"... | [
"procurement.rfq.award"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000022 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Sourcing Events (RFQ) | Not a single bid has come in and two invited suppliers asked for more time — push the deadline out three days. | {"bids_received": 0, "deadline": "tomorrow 17:00", "extension_requests": 2, "policy": "deadline extensions allowed while event is OPEN", "rfq_id": "RFQ-118", "status": "OPEN"} | {"sourcing_note": "scope unchanged, only timing"} | [{"description": "Move the submission deadline of an OPEN sourcing event to a later date without changing scope.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "procurement.rfq.extend_deadline"}, {"description": "Change line items or specifications on an OPEN event; re-notifies participants.", "domain": "Procur... | [
"procurement.rfq.extend_deadline"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000023 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Sourcing Events (RFQ) | One bid out of seven invites is not real competition — scrap this round; we will re-issue next quarter with a wider list. | {"bids_received": 1, "decision": "terminate round; re-issue next quarter", "rfq_id": "RFQ-455", "status": "OPEN", "suppliers_invited": 7} | {"policy": "below competition threshold requires event termination"} | [{"description": "Terminate the sourcing event and notify participants it will not be awarded.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.rfq.cancel"}, {"description": "Move the submission deadline of an OPEN event to a later date.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "procur... | [
"procurement.rfq.cancel"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000024 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Contract Management | The agreement runs out in about six weeks and the auto-rollover was switched off — roll the same terms into another twelve months. | {"auto_renew": false, "contract_id": "CT-330", "end_date": "45 days out", "requested_term": "12 months", "terms_change_requested": "none"} | {"note": "same pricing and clauses, new term"} | [{"description": "Roll an expiring contract into a new term with unchanged terms and notify the counterparty.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.contract.renew"}, {"description": "Change clauses, pricing, or volumes inside the current term via a formal modification.", "domain": "Procur... | [
"procurement.contract.renew"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000025 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Contract Management | The SLA breaches are documented — exercise the for-cause exit clause on the logistics agreement now; do not wait for it to lapse. | {"contract_id": "CT-501", "exit_clause": "for-cause, immediate effect", "months_remaining": 6, "sla_breaches_documented": true} | {"penalty_framework": "defined in exit clause"} | [{"description": "Execute early termination under the contract's exit clause, triggering notice and penalty handling.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.contract.terminate"}, {"description": "Administratively close a contract only after it reaches its natural end date.", "domain": "Pro... | [
"procurement.contract.terminate"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000026 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Contract Management | Send the draft master services agreement to outside counsel for a redline before anything gets signed. | {"contract_id": "CT-777", "external_counsel_required": true, "status": "DRAFT_INTERNAL_REVIEW"} | {"policy": "external redline must be requested via legal routing"} | [{"description": "Draft a brand-new contract from scratch.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "CREATE", "name": "procurement.contract.create"}, {"description": "Advance the contract through the internal approval chain only.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.contract.approve"}, {"des... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000028 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Goods Receipts | The supplier shipped the wrong SKU and has an RMA open — get the 40 wrong units picked up and sent back; a replacement is already on its way. | {"gr_id": "GR-7719", "gr_quantity_correction": "handled via replacement process", "issue": "wrong SKU, 40 units", "replacement_status": "in transit", "rma_number": "RMA open with vendor"} | {"vendor": "covering pickup costs under RMA"} | [{"description": "Create a vendor return document and schedule pickup logistics for goods already received, under an open RMA.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "procurement.receipt.create_return"}, {"description": "Reverse a posted goods receipt to correct booked quantities.", "domain": "Procurem... | [
"procurement.receipt.create_return"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000029 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Requisitions | Restore last week's cancelled capital request back to approved status so the buyer can proceed. | {"cancelled_by": "requester", "cancelled_days_ago": 7, "po_created": false, "requisition_id": "REQ-7781", "status": "CANCELLED"} | {"policy": "cancelled requisitions cannot be reopened; a new request must be raised"} | [{"description": "Raise a brand-new requisition from scratch.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "CREATE", "name": "procurement.requisition.create"}, {"description": "Edit lines or dates on an APPROVED-but-unconverted requisition.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "procurement.requisition.update"... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000030 | en | sibling_action | Procurement | Spend and Reporting | Pull every requisition line over $50k from Q1 into a spreadsheet file for the external audit. | {"audit": "external", "period": "Q1", "requester_role": "procurement_analyst", "threshold": 50000} | {"format_required": "spreadsheet file deliverable"} | [{"description": "Return requisition lines matching filters as on-screen results; no file export is produced.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "SEARCH", "name": "procurement.requisition.search"}, {"description": "Raise a new requisition.", "domain": "Procurement", "family": "CREATE", "name": "procurement.requisitio... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "Procurement", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "29a5d78ea3546e2cc79c4475"} |
v1-hard-0000031 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | My workstation refuses to power on this morning - no lights, no fans, nothing. I need this logged so someone can take a look. | {"monitoring_alerts": [], "open_tickets_for_requester": 0, "requester_department": "Finance"} | {"channel": "chat", "report_time": "08:12"} | [{"description": "Open a new incident record for a newly reported fault or disruption affecting a user or service.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Look up existing incident records by ID, user, service, or keyword and show their status.", "domain": "ITSM", "fa... | [
"create_incident_ticket"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000032 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | I logged something about the shared printers on Tuesday - can you pull up where that stands right now? | {"requester_open_incidents": [{"assigned_group": "End User Computing", "id": "INC-2041", "status": "in_progress", "summary": "Shared printer queue stalled - 3rd floor"}]} | {"requester_intent": "status_visibility_only"} | [{"description": "Retrieve existing incident records and their current status, assignment, and history without changing them.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "SEARCH", "name": "search_incident_tickets"}, {"description": "Modify details of an incident already in the system.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": ... | [
"search_incident_tickets"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000033 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | The fix on INC-1187 was confirmed working by the user two days ago and the waiting period has passed - wrap it up for good and get it off the board. | {"incident": {"closure_eligible_after_hours": 48, "hours_since_resolution": 51, "id": "INC-1187", "status": "resolved_pending_closure", "user_confirmation": true}} | {} | [{"description": "Finalize an incident that is resolved and past its confirmation window, removing it from active queues.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "close_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Mark an in-progress incident as fixed; moves it to resolved pending user confirmation.", "domain": "ITSM", "... | [
"close_incident_ticket"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000034 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | INC-3391 has been parked with the second-line team for six hours past the response target and nobody has touched it - get it in front of someone with the authority to act. | {"incident": {"assigned_group": "Tier 2 Support", "hours_in_current_group": 6, "id": "INC-3391", "priority": "P2", "sla_response_breached": true, "status": "assigned"}} | {"sla_policy": "breached_P2_requires_management_attention"} | [{"description": "Raise an incident to a higher tier or management level due to inaction or SLA breach.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "escalate_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Move an incident laterally to a different support group without changing its urgency or level.", "domain": "ITSM", "family"... | [
"escalate_incident_ticket"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000036 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | change_management | The firewall rule change went through review this morning and the board wants to let it move forward toward implementation. | {"change": {"id": "CHG-6620", "reviews_completed": 2, "risk_level": "medium", "status": "awaiting_cab_approval", "title": "Firewall rule adjustment"}} | {"board_session": "in_progress"} | [{"description": "Record the go-ahead decision on a change currently pending approval.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "approve_change_request"}, {"description": "Send a drafted change into the approval queue for review.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "submit_change_for_approval"}, {"desc... | [
"approve_change_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000037 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | change_management | After the impact review, the board has decided the datacenter power migration is not going ahead - record their verdict on the request. | {"change": {"id": "CHG-8103", "risk_level": "high", "status": "awaiting_cab_approval", "title": "Datacenter power migration"}} | {} | [{"description": "Record the board's decision to decline a change at the approval stage.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "reject_change_request"}, {"description": "Withdraw a change after approval but before implementation begins.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "cancel_change_request"}, {... | [
"reject_change_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000038 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | change_management | Last night's storage firmware change took the file shares down - everything needs to be put back the way it was, right now. | {"change": {"id": "CHG-9001", "implemented_at": "23:40", "post_implementation_result": "outage", "status": "implemented", "title": "Storage firmware update"}} | {"affected_service": "file_shares"} | [{"description": "Restore the environment to its pre-change state after a faulty implementation.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "rollback_change"}, {"description": "Withdraw a change that has not yet been implemented.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "cancel_change_request"}, {"descripti... | [
"rollback_change"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000039 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | problem_management | That's the fourth report this week of the VPN dropping after twenty minutes - connect these tickets to the investigation the network team opened on Monday. | {"problem": {"id": "PRB-331", "linked_incidents": 3, "status": "investigation", "title": "VPN session drops after 20 minutes"}, "recent_matching_incidents": ["INC-4401", "INC-4409", "INC-4415", "INC-4422"]} | {} | [{"description": "Associate existing incident records with an open problem investigation as occurrences of the same underlying fault.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "link_incidents_to_problem"}, {"description": "Combine multiple tickets describing the exact same single event into one master record.", "d... | [
"link_incidents_to_problem"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000040 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | problem_management | We now have a confirmed workaround for the mail sync bug - put it into the known error database so agents stop rediscovering it case by case. | {"problem": {"id": "PRB-402", "known_error_entry": null, "status": "root_cause_identified", "title": "Mail sync failure", "workaround": "Disable add-in X and re-authenticate"}} | {"audience": "service_desk_agents"} | [{"description": "Register a confirmed fault plus its workaround in the known error database tied to a problem record, for agent use.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_known_error_entry"}, {"description": "Release a drafted end-user knowledge article so it appears in public search.", "domain": "IT... | [
"create_known_error_entry"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000041 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | knowledge_management | The new VPN setup guide cleared technical review with zero comments - it should go live so people can find it in search. | {"kb_article": {"audience": "all_employees", "id": "KB-118", "status": "in_review", "technical_review": "passed", "title": "VPN setup guide"}} | {} | [{"description": "Move a reviewed draft live so it appears in knowledge search results.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "publish_kb_article"}, {"description": "Start a brand-new draft article in the knowledge base.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_kb_article"}, {"description": "Edi... | [
"publish_kb_article"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000044 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | service_request_fulfillment | Tell procurement to forget the standing desk - I found one in storage. It hasn't shipped yet. | {"service_request": {"approval": "granted", "id": "SR-6108", "item": "standing desk", "shipped": false, "status": "pending_fulfillment"}} | {"requested_by_current_user": true} | [{"description": "Withdraw a not-yet-delivered request at the requester's own wish.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "cancel_service_request"}, {"description": "Decline a request during the approval stage, typically by an approver.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "reject_service_request"}, ... | [
"cancel_service_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000045 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | service_request_fulfillment | The access badge request came back approved an hour ago - go ahead and produce the badge so it's waiting at reception. | {"service_request": {"delivery_ready": false, "id": "SR-7702", "item": "building access badge", "status": "approved"}} | {} | [{"description": "Provision and deliver the item once a request is approved.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "fulfill_service_request"}, {"description": "Record manager approval for a pending request.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "approve_service_request"}, {"description": "Finalize a... | [
"fulfill_service_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000046 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | Three different people opened tickets about the email system being down - they're all describing the same single event. Fold them together so the team isn't triaging it three times. | {"duplicate_analysis": "same_window_same_symptom", "open_incidents": [{"id": "INC-9101", "reported_at": "09:58", "summary": "No email access"}, {"id": "INC-9102", "reported_at": "09:59", "summary": "Outlook not connecting"}, {"id": "INC-9104", "reported_at": "10:01", "summary": "Mail down for team"}]} | {} | [{"description": "Combine multiple reports of the same single occurrence into one master incident record.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "merge_duplicate_incidents"}, {"description": "Attach separate occurrences of a recurring underlying fault to a problem investigation.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "R... | [
"merge_duplicate_incidents"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000047 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | The network team pinged us - INC-2277 isn't a connectivity fault, the application itself is throwing errors. Hand it to the application support crew. | {"incident": {"assigned_group": "Network Support", "id": "INC-2277", "priority": "P3", "status": "in_progress", "target_group": "Application Support"}} | {"misrouting_reason": "initial_symptom_resembled_network_issue"} | [{"description": "Move an incident to a different support group at the same support level.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "reassign_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Raise an incident to a higher tier or management level for severity or SLA reasons.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "esca... | [
"reassign_incident_ticket"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000048 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | The CFO's office is completely blocked by this - the record is still sitting at medium urgency and that has to be corrected. | {"incident": {"affected_user_title": "CFO office", "assigned_group": "Tier 1", "id": "INC-5150", "priority": "medium", "status": "in_progress"}} | {} | [{"description": "Change the urgency and impact rating recorded on an incident.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_incident_priority"}, {"description": "Move an incident to a higher support tier or management level.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "escalate_incident_ticket"}, {"descr... | [
"update_incident_priority"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000049 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | major_incident_management | Every office is reporting the CRM is unreachable and the phones are lighting up - invoke the big-outage protocol and get the response bridge going. | {"active_alerts": ["crm_probe:down:all_regions"], "major_incident_active": false, "related_open_incidents": 14} | {"affected_sites": 6} | [{"description": "Formally invoke the major-incident process with a coordinated response bridge for a widespread outage.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "declare_major_incident"}, {"description": "Raise a single incident to a higher tier or management level.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name":... | [
"declare_major_incident"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000050 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | asset_management | The designer moving from the fourth floor to the studio keeps her laptop - move the machine's assignment to her new cost center and location. | {"asset": {"assigned_to": "d-fictional-01", "id": "AST-3021", "location": "HQ-4F", "status": "in_service", "type": "laptop"}, "transfer_approved": true} | {} | [{"description": "Transfer an in-service asset's assigned owner, cost center, or location.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "reassign_asset_record"}, {"description": "Remove an asset from active service into disposal or stock, retaining its history.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "retire_a... | [
"reassign_asset_record"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000051 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | sla_management | We've asked the customer for log files and can't move until they reply - the response timer shouldn't keep burning while we wait on them. | {"incident": {"id": "INC-6033", "sla_breached": false, "sla_response_remaining_minutes": 47, "status": "pending_customer"}} | {"waiting_on": "customer_log_files"} | [{"description": "Suspend the SLA timers on an incident while it waits on an external party.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "pause_sla_clock"}, {"description": "Apply an approved exception that forgives an existing or already-committed breach.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "override_sl... | [
"pause_sla_clock"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000052 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | sla_management | Ops leadership signed off on an exception for the response breach on INC-7719 during the holiday freeze - apply the approved waiver so the reporting reflects it. | {"exception": {"approved_by": "ops_leadership", "reason": "holiday_freeze"}, "incident": {"breach_minutes": 22, "id": "INC-7719", "sla_response_breached": true}} | {} | [{"description": "Record an approved exception against a breach so it is waived in reporting.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "override_sla_target"}, {"description": "Suspend timers while waiting on an external party; cannot affect an elapsed breach.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "pause... | [
"override_sla_target"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000054 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | change_management | The patch window opened five minutes ago and CHG-4128 shows all its approvals in place - kick off the work now. | {"change": {"approvals_collected": 2, "id": "CHG-4128", "status": "approved", "title": "OS patch bundle", "window_open": true}} | {} | [{"description": "Execute an approved change within its open window.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "implement_change_request"}, {"description": "Record an approval decision on a pending change.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "approve_change_request"}, {"description": "Assign a window ... | [
"implement_change_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000055 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | The licence server restart cleared the login failures and the user just confirmed everything works - mark this one fixed. | {"incident": {"fix_applied": true, "hours_since_fix": 1, "id": "INC-8802", "status": "in_progress", "user_verification": "confirmed_working"}} | {"closure_policy_hours": 48} | [{"description": "Mark an incident fixed pending the confirmation or closure window.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "resolve_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Permanently finalize an already-resolved incident past its confirmation window.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "close_incident_... | [
"resolve_incident_ticket"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000056 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | The mailbox sync issue we marked fixed last Thursday is back this morning for the same person - it shouldn't have been counted as done. | {"incident": {"days_since_resolution": 3, "id": "INC-7788", "recurrence_reported": true, "resolution": "cache clear", "same_requester": true, "status": "resolved_pending_closure"}} | {} | [{"description": "Return a resolved incident to in-progress because the fault returned.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "reopen_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Register a brand-new incident for a new issue.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Ed... | [
"reopen_incident_ticket"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000057 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | Legal wants INC-3004 erased from the system completely - ticket body, work notes, and the entire audit trail - so no trace remains. | {"incident": {"contains": ["ticket_body", "work_notes", "audit_trail"], "id": "INC-3004", "status": "closed"}} | {"record_retention_policy": "immutable_audit"} | [{"description": "Finalize an incident record; all contents and history are retained.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "close_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Withdraw an erroneous incident; the record and its history are retained.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "cancel_incident_ticket"... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000059 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | The bulk edit this morning scrambled the categories on forty incident records - put every one of them back exactly the way it was before that edit. | {"audit_retention_days": 365, "last_bulk_edit": {"affected_records": 40, "reversible": false, "timestamp": "09:47", "type": "category_overwrite"}} | {} | [{"description": "Set new field values on a single incident record; does not restore prior values or history.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_incident_ticket"}, {"description": "Combine duplicate reports into one master incident.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "merge_duplicate_in... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000060 | en | sibling_action | ITSM | incident_management | Fire off the satisfaction survey to everyone who logged a ticket last quarter - all four thousand of them. | {"current_user_role": "service_desk_manager", "survey_tool_status": "connected", "tickets_last_quarter": 4127} | {"requested_scope": "bulk_campaign"} | [{"description": "Send a status update about one specific active incident to its subscribed stakeholders.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "NOTIFY", "name": "notify_stakeholders"}, {"description": "Message the requester of a single specific ticket.", "domain": "ITSM", "family": "NOTIFY", "name": "notify_requester"}, {"des... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "ITSM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "b03e251bd4acd5a6a43927f9"} |
v1-hard-0000061 | en | sibling_action | hr | recruiting | REQ-2214, the senior designer role, is officially filled through the agency hire who starts Monday — wrap it up so sourcing stops and it no longer shows as open headcount. | {"current_requisition": {"candidates_in_pipeline": 3, "hire_confirmed": true, "id": "REQ-2214", "status": "sourcing", "title": "Senior Designer"}, "user_role": "hr_business_partner"} | {"source": "slack", "urgent": false} | [{"description": "Find requisitions by title, status, department, or hiring manager.", "domain": "hr", "family": "SEARCH", "name": "search_requisitions"}, {"description": "Edit requisition fields such as title, level, location, or job description.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_requisition"}, {"d... | [
"close_requisition"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000062 | en | sibling_action | hr | recruiting | The Q3 hiring freeze was ratified this morning — pull back the procurement analyst req before any offers go out; nothing will be filled this quarter. | {"current_requisition": {"candidates_in_pipeline": 2, "hire_confirmed": false, "id": "REQ-2231", "status": "sourcing", "title": "Procurement Analyst"}, "hiring_freeze": {"active": true, "approved_today": true}, "user_role": "talent_acquisition_lead"} | {} | [{"description": "Approve a requisition that is pending so it can move to sourcing.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_requisition"}, {"description": "Mark a requisition as filled/completed and end active sourcing on it.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "close_requisition"}, {"descripti... | [
"cancel_requisition"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000063 | en | sibling_action | hr | offer_management | Jaleel signed with a competitor overnight, so we're done waiting — retract our offer for the data engineer role on our side before this drags on. | {"offer": {"candidate": "J. Osei", "id": "OFR-8891", "role": "Data Engineer", "signature": "not_received", "status": "extended"}, "user_role": "recruiter"} | {"channel": "email_forward"} | [{"description": "Draft a new offer letter with terms for a candidate.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_offer"}, {"description": "Edit terms such as salary, start date, or level on a drafted offer.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_offer"}, {"description": "Give final internal s... | [
"withdraw_offer"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000064 | en | sibling_action | hr | offer_management | Just got off the phone — the senior analyst candidate is going elsewhere. Log in the tracker that she turned us down so the req can reopen. | {"offer": {"candidate_response": "declined_verbal", "id": "OFR-8904", "role": "Senior Analyst", "status": "extended"}, "user_role": "recruiter"} | {} | [{"description": "Edit terms such as salary, start date, or level on a drafted offer.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_offer"}, {"description": "Retract an already-extended offer on the employer's initiative.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "withdraw_offer"}, {"description": "Record t... | [
"reject_offer"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000065 | en | sibling_action | hr | leave_management | Team lead confirmed coverage is arranged for the last week of March — go ahead and sign off on Fatima's vacation request in the system. | {"pending_requests": [{"dates": "Mar 24-28", "employee": "F. Haddad", "id": "LR-3341", "status": "pending_manager_approval", "type": "vacation"}], "user_role": "people_manager"} | {} | [{"description": "File a new time-off request for an employee.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "submit_leave_request"}, {"description": "Change dates or leave type on a request that is still pending, not yet decided.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_leave_request"}, {"description": "D... | [
"approve_leave_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000066 | en | sibling_action | hr | leave_management | Fatima emailed to say scrap the March vacation request entirely — the trip fell through and she'll refile in the summer if needed. | {"pending_requests": [{"dates": "Mar 24-28", "employee": "F. Haddad", "id": "LR-3341", "status": "pending_manager_approval", "type": "vacation"}], "user_role": "people_manager"} | {"source": "employee_email_relay"} | [{"description": "Approve a pending time-off request so the days are deducted from balance.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_leave_request"}, {"description": "Change dates or leave type on a request that is still pending, not yet decided.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_leave... | [
"cancel_leave_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000067 | en | sibling_action | hr | leave_management | Fatima still wants the time off, but she needs it slid from the last week of March to the first week of April — same one week of vacation. | {"pending_requests": [{"dates": "Mar 24-28", "employee": "F. Haddad", "id": "LR-3341", "status": "pending_manager_approval", "type": "vacation"}], "user_role": "people_manager"} | {} | [{"description": "Withdraw a filed leave request, by the employee or on their behalf.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "cancel_leave_request"}, {"description": "Approve a pending time-off request so the days are deducted from balance.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_leave_request"}, ... | [
"update_leave_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000068 | en | sibling_action | hr | leave_management | Before I sign anything off, check how many vacation days Fatima has left this year — I don't want to approve more than she's earned. | {"pending_requests": [{"dates": "Mar 24-28", "employee": "F. Haddad", "id": "LR-3341", "status": "pending_manager_approval", "type": "vacation"}], "user_role": "people_manager"} | {} | [{"description": "Approve a pending time-off request so the days are deducted from balance.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_leave_request"}, {"description": "Deny a pending time-off request with a stated reason.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reject_leave_request"}, {"description"... | [
"search_leave_balances"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000069 | en | sibling_action | hr | performance | I just finished the write-up for Dmitri's 360 — record my ratings and comments while the window is still open. | {"review_cycle": {"due_in_days": 4, "my_assignments": 2, "name": "Spring 360", "status": "open"}, "user_role": "reviewer"} | {} | [{"description": "Create and start a new review cycle for a population.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "launch_review_cycle"}, {"description": "Name or replace a reviewer on a specific person's review.", "domain": "hr", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "assign_reviewer"}, {"description": "Manager signs off on ... | [
"submit_review"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000070 | en | sibling_action | hr | performance | Dmitri's manager declared a conflict of interest — put Priya on his 360 as the replacement reviewer. | {"review": {"current_reviewer": "recused", "replacement": "P. Raman", "reviewee": "D. Volkov"}, "review_cycle": {"name": "Spring 360", "status": "open"}, "user_role": "hr_program_admin"} | {} | [{"description": "Submit reviewer feedback and ratings for a reviewee during an open cycle.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "submit_review"}, {"description": "End the cycle and lock all reviews from further edits.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "close_review_cycle"}, {"description": "Name ... | [
"assign_reviewer"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000071 | en | sibling_action | hr | performance | All sixteen reviews in the spring cycle are signed and calibration wrapped tonight — lock the cycle down so nothing can be edited afterward. | {"review_cycle": {"calibration_done": true, "name": "Spring 360", "reviews_completed": 16, "reviews_total": 16, "status": "open"}, "user_role": "hr_program_admin"} | {"deadline": "tonight"} | [{"description": "Create and start a new review cycle for a population.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "launch_review_cycle"}, {"description": "Submit reviewer feedback and ratings for a reviewee during an open cycle.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "submit_review"}, {"description": "Name ... | [
"close_review_cycle"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000072 | en | sibling_action | hr | time_tracking | Marek's timesheet bills 12 hours to the Atlas project, but he rolled off Atlas three weeks ago — bounce it back to him with that flagged. | {"timesheet": {"employee": "M. Novak", "flagged_line": "Atlas x12h — employee rolled off", "status": "submitted", "week": "W12"}, "user_role": "project_manager"} | {} | [{"description": "File a week's hours for approval.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "submit_timesheet"}, {"description": "Approve a submitted timesheet so hours flow to payroll.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_timesheet"}, {"description": "Return a submitted timesheet to the employ... | [
"reject_timesheet"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000073 | en | sibling_action | hr | time_tracking | Marek fixed the Atlas entries and resubmitted — 40 hours across two valid projects, matches the project log, so let it through to payroll. | {"timesheet": {"employee": "M. Novak", "prior_rejection": "Atlas entries corrected", "status": "resubmitted", "total_hours": 40, "week": "W12"}, "user_role": "project_manager"} | {} | [{"description": "Return a submitted timesheet to the employee with comments for correction.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reject_timesheet"}, {"description": "Unlock a timesheet that was already approved so it can be corrected.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reopen_timesheet"}, {"descr... | [
"approve_timesheet"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000074 | en | sibling_action | hr | time_tracking | I cleared Marek's week-12 timesheet by mistake and just spotted a duplicated Saturday shift — can you unlock it so he can fix it and I can re-approve? | {"timesheet": {"duplicate_entry": "Saturday shift listed twice", "employee": "M. Novak", "status": "approved", "week": "W12"}, "user_role": "project_manager"} | {"urgent": true} | [{"description": "Approve a submitted timesheet so hours flow to payroll.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_timesheet"}, {"description": "Return a submitted timesheet to the employee with comments for correction.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reject_timesheet"}, {"description": "Fi... | [
"reopen_timesheet"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000075 | en | sibling_action | hr | payroll | Nadia's six overtime hours from the 14th never made it into the current payroll draft — add them at time-and-a-half before we lock the run. | {"employee_entry": {"employee": "N. Adeyemi", "overtime_hours_missing": 6}, "payroll_run": {"disbursed": false, "period": "March", "status": "draft"}, "user_role": "payroll_specialist"} | {} | [{"description": "Execute the payroll run and disburse salaries for a period.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "run_payroll"}, {"description": "Give final sign-off on a finalized payroll run.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_payroll"}, {"description": "Abort a draft payroll run befor... | [
"adjust_payroll_entry"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000076 | en | sibling_action | hr | payroll | External auditors want a spreadsheet of the last four payroll runs showing gross-to-net for every employee — can you produce that for them? | {"payroll_runs": {"bulk_export_available": false, "last_four": "finalized"}, "user_role": "payroll_specialist"} | {"requester": "external_audit"} | [{"description": "Execute the payroll run and disburse salaries for a period.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "run_payroll"}, {"description": "Give final sign-off on a finalized payroll run.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_payroll"}, {"description": "Abort a draft payroll run befor... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000077 | en | sibling_action | hr | benefits | Kwame is staying on his wife's medical plan, so during this open enrollment window he wants to formally decline coverage through us. | {"employee_enrollments": {"medical": "external_spousal_plan"}, "open_enrollment": {"active": true, "closes_in_days": 5}, "user_role": "benefits_admin"} | {} | [{"description": "Enroll an employee into a benefit plan.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "enroll_benefit_plan"}, {"description": "Change plan choices, such as switching tier or plan, while enrolled or during enrollment.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_benefit_election"}, {"descripti... | [
"waive_benefit_coverage"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000078 | en | sibling_action | hr | benefits | Kwame enrolled in the dental plan back in January, but it turns out his union contract already covers dental — take him off it effective the 1st. | {"employee_enrollments": {"dental": {"effective": "Jan 1", "status": "active"}}, "open_enrollment": {"active": false}, "user_role": "benefits_admin"} | {} | [{"description": "Formally decline employer coverage during an enrollment window.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "waive_benefit_coverage"}, {"description": "Change plan choices, such as switching tier or plan, while enrolled or during enrollment.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_bene... | [
"cancel_benefit_enrollment"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000079 | en | sibling_action | hr | onboarding | The new analyst starts Monday — pair her with someone from the data team who can show her the ropes as her buddy. | {"onboarding_case": {"buddy": null, "id": "ONB-552", "new_hire": "L. Okafor", "starts": "Monday", "status": "in_progress"}, "user_role": "hr_coordinator"} | {} | [{"description": "Kick off the onboarding workflow for a new hire.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "start_onboarding"}, {"description": "Edit details of a specific onboarding checklist task.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_onboarding_task"}, {"description": "Mark an onboarding checkl... | [
"assign_onboarding_buddy"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000080 | en | sibling_action | hr | onboarding | Her background verification is dragging, so give her onboarding checklist three more weeks to finish instead of letting it flag her as overdue. | {"onboarding_case": {"blockers": ["background_verification"], "due_date": "Apr 4", "id": "ONB-552", "new_hire": "L. Okafor", "status": "in_progress"}, "user_role": "hr_coordinator"} | {} | [{"description": "Designate a colleague as the new hire's onboarding buddy.", "domain": "hr", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "assign_onboarding_buddy"}, {"description": "Mark an onboarding checklist task as done.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "complete_onboarding_task"}, {"description": "Abort an onboardin... | [
"extend_onboarding_deadline"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000081 | en | sibling_action | hr | offboarding | Ravi's resignation is confirmed with the 29th as his last day — get the departure checklist moving so access and equipment are handled in time. | {"employee": {"employment_status": "active", "last_day": "Mar 29", "name": "R. Menon"}, "offboarding_case": null, "user_role": "hr_business_partner"} | {} | [{"description": "Start the offboarding workflow for a departing employee.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "initiate_offboarding"}, {"description": "Edit dates or steps in an in-progress offboarding plan.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_offboarding_plan"}, {"description": "Record com... | [
"initiate_offboarding"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000082 | en | sibling_action | hr | offboarding | IT still hasn't collected Ravi's laptop two weeks past his last day, and it's holding up his final clearance — get this in front of people who can actually force it through. | {"offboarding_case": {"employee": {"employment_status": "terminated"}, "id": "OFF-118", "overdue_tasks": [{"overdue_days": 14, "owner": "IT", "task": "equipment_return"}], "status": "in_progress"}, "user_role": "hr_business_partner"} | {"prior_reminders_sent": 3} | [{"description": "Edit dates or steps in an in-progress offboarding plan.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_offboarding_plan"}, {"description": "Record completed exit interview outcomes.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "complete_exit_interview"}, {"description": "Finalize the case onc... | [
"escalate_offboarding_blocker"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000083 | en | sibling_action | hr | offboarding | Marta's termination was overturned on appeal three weeks after her exit fully completed — bring her back on as an active employee in the HRIS. | {"employee": {"employment_status": "terminated", "name": "M. Duarte"}, "offboarding_case": {"completed": true, "status": "closed"}, "user_role": "hr_business_partner"} | {"legal_ruling": "reinstatement_ordered"} | [{"description": "Start the offboarding workflow for a departing employee.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "initiate_offboarding"}, {"description": "Edit dates or steps in an in-progress offboarding plan.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_offboarding_plan"}, {"description": "Cancel an ... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000084 | en | sibling_action | hr | employee_records | There are somehow two profiles for Ingrid — one under her maiden name — and payroll keeps hitting the wrong one. Combine them into a single record. | {"duplicate_records_detected": 1, "profiles_for_employee": [{"active": true, "id": "E-1042", "name": "I. Larsen"}, {"active": true, "id": "E-2317", "name": "I. Voss (maiden)"}], "user_role": "hris_admin"} | {} | [{"description": "Create a new employee profile in the HRIS.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_employee_record"}, {"description": "Edit fields on a single existing employee profile.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_employee_record"}, {"description": "Move an inactive employee pr... | [
"merge_employee_records"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000085 | en | sibling_action | hr | employee_records | Retention policy says we keep the file, but Ingrid has been gone over a year — move her profile out of the active staff directory. | {"employee_record": {"id": "E-1042", "in_active_directory": true, "name": "I. Larsen", "status": "former_employee", "terminated_days_ago": 380}, "user_role": "hris_admin"} | {} | [{"description": "Combine duplicate profiles into one record, preserving history from both.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "merge_employee_records"}, {"description": "Edit fields on a single existing employee profile.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_employee_record"}, {"description"... | [
"archive_employee_record"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000086 | en | sibling_action | hr | compensation | The comp committee signed off on Theo moving up to Senior Engineer effective the 1st — make it official in the system. | {"promotion_case": {"committee_decision": "approved", "employee": "T. Alvarez", "proposed_level": "Senior Engineer", "status": "pending_final_signoff"}, "user_role": "compensation_analyst"} | {"effective_date": "the 1st"} | [{"description": "Submit a new promotion case for consideration.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_promotion_request"}, {"description": "Finalize an approved promotion so the new level takes effect.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_promotion"}, {"description": "Deny a pending p... | [
"approve_promotion"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000087 | en | sibling_action | hr | performance | One director missed the cutoff and her feedback for Dmitri never got recorded — can you open the spring 360 back up just long enough for her to submit? | {"review_cycle": {"closed_days_ago": 1, "name": "Spring 360", "outstanding_feedback": 1, "status": "closed"}, "user_role": "hr_program_admin"} | {"late_reason": "medical_leave", "requester": "director"} | [{"description": "Create and start a brand-new review cycle for a population.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "launch_review_cycle"}, {"description": "Submit reviewer feedback and ratings for a reviewee, valid only during an open cycle.", "domain": "hr", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "submit_review"}, {"de... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000088 | en | sibling_action | hr | internal_mobility | Lena wants to move from Support over to the Platform team as an internal transfer — can you get that request into the system for her? | {"employee": {"current_team": "Support", "employment_status": "active", "name": "L. Brandt"}, "transfer_requests": [], "user_role": "hr_business_partner"} | {"open_role": "yes", "target_team": "Platform"} | [{"description": "Open a new internal transfer request for an employee to another team.", "domain": "hr", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_transfer_request"}, {"description": "Approve a pending internal transfer so the move proceeds.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "approve_transfer_request"}, {"descri... | [
"create_transfer_request"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000089 | en | sibling_action | hr | learning_compliance | Annual compliance training closed Friday and half of Operations hasn't finished — push this up to their directors before audit finds it. | {"training": {"audit_window": "next_week", "completion_rate": {"Operations": 0.48}, "course": "Annual Compliance 101", "status": "closed"}, "user_role": "compliance_training_admin"} | {"reminders_sent": 2} | [{"description": "Assign a course to one or more employees.", "domain": "hr", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "assign_training_course"}, {"description": "Change due date or course details on an existing assignment.", "domain": "hr", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "update_training_assignment"}, {"description": "Mark an employee... | [
"escalate_training_compliance"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "HR", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "2908a7fd972b789fa6c63a07"} |
v1-hard-0000091 | en | sibling_action | CRM | lead_management | The contact from the webinar signup form keeps downloading our case studies and matches our target profile — move them forward in the pipeline. | {"lead": {"icp_match": true, "lead_id": "LD-2291", "score": 71, "source": "webinar_signup", "status": "new"}, "qualification_threshold": 60} | {} | [{"description": "Advance a scored inbound lead from new to the qualified stage once it meets the fit threshold.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "qualify_lead"}, {"description": "Transform a qualified lead into new contact, account, and opportunity records.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "name": ... | [
"qualify_lead"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000092 | en | sibling_action | CRM | case_management | The buyer just replied on the support thread we resolved last week — put that ticket back into the open queue. | {"case": {"case_id": "CS-4412", "closed_at": "2024-05-02", "resolution": "password reset issued", "status": "closed"}} | {} | [{"description": "Move a previously resolved case back to open status and log a new interaction entry.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reopen_case"}, {"description": "Edit fields like subject, description, or custom attributes on an existing open case.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "upd... | [
"reopen_case"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000093 | en | sibling_action | CRM | opportunity_management | Grantham Industrial signed with a rival vendor this morning — record that outcome and pull the deal out of the active forecast. | {"opportunity": {"forecast_category": "pipeline", "opp_id": "OP-3098", "stage": "proposal", "status": "open", "value": 84000}} | {} | [{"description": "Mark an open opportunity as closed lost with a loss reason and remove it from the forecast.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "close_opportunity_lost"}, {"description": "Mark an open opportunity as closed won and start the won-handoff flow.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "... | [
"close_opportunity_lost"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000094 | en | sibling_action | CRM | campaign_management | Legal wants the 'Spring Blast' promo campaign and all of its creative assets permanently erased from the system. | {"campaign": {"campaign_id": "CMP-3320", "name": "Spring Blast", "status": "completed"}} | {} | [{"description": "Temporarily halt delivery of a running campaign that can be resumed later.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "pause_campaign"}, {"description": "Start delivery of a drafted or paused campaign.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "activate_campaign"}, {"description": "Duplicate... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000095 | en | sibling_action | CRM | account_management | We somehow have two records for the same logistics customer — consolidate the duplicate into the primary one and keep its history. | {"accounts": [{"account_id": "AC-1187", "is_master": true, "name": "Vantage Logistics"}, {"account_id": "AC-2043", "is_master": false, "name": "Vantage Logistics Ltd"}]} | {} | [{"description": "Combine two duplicate account records into one surviving master, preserving related history.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "merge_accounts"}, {"description": "Associate two related but distinct accounts, such as parent and subsidiary, without combining them.", "domain": "CRM", "famil... | [
"merge_accounts"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000097 | en | sibling_action | CRM | approval_workflow | I'm not allowed to sign that 28% price cut on the Kestrel deal and it signatures Friday — get it in front of someone with the authority to decide it. | {"approval_request": {"current_level": "manager", "discount_pct": 28, "request_id": "APR-662", "status": "pending", "subject": "discount"}, "policy": {"manager_discount_limit_pct": 15, "vp_discount_limit_pct": 30}} | {} | [{"description": "Route a pending approval to the next higher authority level capable of deciding it.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "escalate_approval"}, {"description": "Sign off on a pending discount request within one's own approval limit.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "approve_disc... | [
"escalate_approval"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000098 | en | sibling_action | CRM | quote_management | The buyer wants the three-year term instead — cut a new revision of quote 2091 with the corrected line items. | {"quote": {"quote_id": "QT-2091", "status": "draft", "term_months": 12, "version": 2}} | {} | [{"description": "Produce the next version of an existing quote, superseding the prior one with edited lines.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "revise_quote"}, {"description": "Generate a brand-new quote from scratch or from an opportunity without version linkage.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "n... | [
"revise_quote"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000099 | en | sibling_action | CRM | contact_management | Add Priya as a secondary billing contact on the Halstead account — she already exists in our system, don't create a new entry. | {"account": {"account_id": "AC-0921", "name": "Halstead Partners", "primary_billing_contact": "CT-4402"}, "contact": {"contact_id": "CT-5567", "exists": true, "name": "Priya N."}} | {} | [{"description": "Associate an existing contact record with an account in a specified role.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "link_contact"}, {"description": "Add a brand-new contact record from scratch.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_contact"}, {"description": "Edit a contact's ow... | [
"link_contact"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000100 | en | sibling_action | CRM | contact_management | Compliance needs a CSV file of every contact who opted out of marketing this quarter. | {"contact_base": {"opt_out_segment": "available via filter", "total_records": 18420}} | {"purpose": "quarterly audit", "requester": "compliance_team"} | [{"description": "Return matching contact records in an on-screen filtered list.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "SEARCH", "name": "search_contacts"}, {"description": "Add a new contact record.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "create_contact"}, {"description": "Edit contact details in place.", "domain": "CR... | [] | true | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000101 | en | sibling_action | CRM | order_management | The buyer backed out — stop order 5510 from shipping before it leaves the warehouse. | {"order": {"order_id": "OR-5510", "payment": "captured", "shipped": false, "status": "processing"}} | {} | [{"description": "Permanently void an unshipped order and release the captured payment.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "EXECUTE", "name": "cancel_order"}, {"description": "Temporarily pause fulfillment while keeping the order open and resumable.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "hold_order"}, {"description"... | [
"cancel_order"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000102 | en | sibling_action | CRM | case_management | Get this fresh networking outage report over to the tier-2 networking team. | {"case": {"assignee": null, "case_id": "CS-1187", "category": "network_outage", "priority": "high", "status": "new"}} | {} | [{"description": "Set the initial owner or team on an unassigned case.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "assign_case"}, {"description": "Move an already-owned case to a different team or rep at the same level.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "transfer_case"}, {"description": "Raise a case's p... | [
"assign_case"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000103 | en | sibling_action | CRM | activity_logging | Just wrapped a great discovery call with the Kelso procurement folks — capture the notes on the opportunity timeline. | {"opportunity": {"account": "Kelso Manufacturing", "opp_id": "OP-7742", "stage": "discovery"}} | {} | [{"description": "Record a completed phone call with summary and outcome on a record's timeline.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "log_call"}, {"description": "Record a completed email exchange on a record's timeline.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "CREATE", "name": "log_email"}, {"description": "Book a fut... | [
"log_call"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000104 | en | sibling_action | CRM | campaign_management | Freeze the webinar sign-up campaign right away — the landing page form is broken. | {"campaign": {"campaign_id": "CMP-7701", "enrollment_open": true, "name": "Spring Webinar Sign-ups", "status": "active"}} | {} | [{"description": "Temporarily halt a live campaign while keeping it resumable.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "pause_campaign"}, {"description": "Retire a campaign permanently to the archive while retaining data.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "OTHER", "name": "archive_campaign"}, {"description": "Resume ... | [
"pause_campaign"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000105 | en | sibling_action | CRM | opportunity_management | With Marcus offboarding Friday, hand his open Meridian Software deals to the EMEA rep. | {"opportunities": [{"opp_id": "OP-6612", "owner": "Marcus T.", "status": "open"}, {"opp_id": "OP-6613", "owner": "Marcus T.", "status": "open"}]} | {} | [{"description": "Change the owner of an existing, already-assigned opportunity.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "reassign_opportunity"}, {"description": "Set the first owner on a newly created, unassigned opportunity.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "ROUTE", "name": "assign_opportunity"}, {"description": "M... | [
"reassign_opportunity"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000107 | en | sibling_action | CRM | lead_management | This 'inbound' is just a competitor fishing for our price sheet — flag it invalid so it stops polluting the queue. | {"lead": {"flagged_reason": "suspected_vendor", "lead_id": "LD-3310", "source": "webform", "status": "new"}} | {} | [{"description": "Mark a lead invalid or spam so it leaves the active working queue permanently.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reject_lead"}, {"description": "Advance a promising lead to the qualified stage.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "qualify_lead"}, {"description": "Turn a qualif... | [
"reject_lead"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000108 | en | sibling_action | CRM | meeting_scheduling | The buyer can't make tomorrow at ten — move the demo to Thursday, same time. | {"meeting": {"attendees": ["buyer", "AE"], "meeting_id": "MT-342", "scheduled_at": "2024-05-08T10:00:00", "status": "confirmed"}} | {} | [{"description": "Move an existing meeting to a new date and time and notify attendees.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "reschedule_meeting"}, {"description": "Cancel a scheduled meeting outright.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "DELETE", "name": "cancel_meeting"}, {"description": "Book a new meeting from s... | [
"reschedule_meeting"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
v1-hard-0000109 | en | sibling_action | CRM | subscription_management | Harborview wants to stay with us but step down from Enterprise to Team before their renewal date. | {"subscription": {"account": "Harborview Clinics", "plan": "enterprise", "renewal_date": "2024-07-01", "seats": 250, "status": "active"}} | {} | [{"description": "Move an active subscription to a lower tier, prorating where applicable.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "UPDATE", "name": "downgrade_subscription"}, {"description": "Terminate the subscription at end of term or immediately.", "domain": "CRM", "family": "DELETE", "name": "cancel_subscription"}, {"descrip... | [
"downgrade_subscription"
] | false | {"category": "sibling_action", "domain_batch": "CRM", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "seed_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059", "seed_source_split": "train", "synthetic": true, "teacher_verified": false} | {"curated_by": "yasserrmd", "generation_method": "category_domain_batched_hard_synthesis_v1", "generation_model": "glm-5.3", "source_dataset": "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-dataset", "source_row_id": "00f91a0f69c57faca1809059"} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- -
Models trained or fine-tuned on yasserrmd/enterprise-reflex-v1-hard-dataset