instruction stringlengths 419 11.2k | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 74 1.04k |
|---|---|---|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive language. Although it mentions the assumption that the person is black, it does not express any harmful intent, insults, or stereotypes towards any specific group, including the middle eastern community. Therefore, it does not target the middle eas... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The provided post does not target any specific identity, affiliation, or person for abuse. It is a general statement expressing confusion and frustration about trying to understand something. Therefore, it falls under the category of Neutral content.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post contains offensive language and is disrespectful in nature, making it offensive.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive content towards any group of people. The statement suggests that something should be taken down and put in a museum, but it does not target or show bias against any particular group. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for being cl... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While the post expresses a personal opinion against both gay and straight marriage, it does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any specific group. T... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not mention anything about middle eastern individuals or target them in any way. It simply states a fact about the poster's family and their father's smoking habits. Therefore, the post is benign.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The provided post does not show any offensive or biased content towards any specific group of people. It simply states that Twitter has become a battlefield, which is a neutral observation without targeting or offending any particular group. Therefore, the post can be classified as Neutral.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any group. Instead, it makes a statement about communists and their access to alcohol, without dehumanizi... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as "Not Offensive" because it does not contain any offensive sentiment to anyone. The post is simply stating that there is an extremely encouraging crosspost from r/television, which is currently at the top of r/All. It does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity that could be ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post is neutral because it is not offensive towards any group of people. It does not display any bias or negativity towards any specific aspect of a group. The post simply expresses excitement and anticipation for someone to meet someone else and expects it to be a joyful experience.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post should be classified as "Normal" based on the given definitions because it does not contain any language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. The post simply states "Nothing to see here, move along" without targeting, insulting, discriminating against, or inciting violence towards any individual o... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive content. It simply suggests that everyone should revisit Cambodia to see its current state. There is no specific targeting of the middle eastern group or any harmful intent expressed in stereotypes or lewd manners.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. It discusses the seriousness of gender dysphoria and the need for medical and pastoral attention to understand the condition. It acknowledges that hormones and surgery alone are not sufficient to improve mental health in individuals ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as "Not Hate" because it does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While the post criticizes and insults certain individuals, it does not target them based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, s... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any offensive language or bias against a specific group of people. It expresses concern about the actions of oil corporations, but does not target or discriminate against any particular group. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is benign because it simply discusses a personal preference for the color green. There is no harmful or offensive language used, nor does it target or refer to any specific group, including Muslims.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post simply states that the person's family is middle eastern, which is a neutral and factual statement. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language or intent towards the middle eastern group. Therefore, it is labeled as benign.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their gender. It also does not contain language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of people based on their gender... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post uses offensive language and insults the recipient, but it does not specifically target men or any other group based on their innate characteristics. Therefore, it does not qualify as hate speech and is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as "Not Hate" because it does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While the post may contain derogatory language and negative opinions about former President Barack Obama, it does not specifically target him based on his race, ethnicity, national orig... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not target the specified group or entity (jewish) in any harmful or offensive manner. It simply expresses complicated feelings about the relationship between Trump and the alt-right. As there is no harmful intent, aggression, insults, or stereotypes present, the post can be labeled as benign.
The correc... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not specifically target any particular group or entity based on their innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. It criticizes the interpretation and use of the Bible, but it does not attack or belittle any specific gr... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their identifying trait or characteristic. It also does not contain any language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. The post describes a personal experience and expresses anger towards racist graffiti, but does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any specific grou... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as neutral because it does not express any bias or offensive language towards any group of people. It is a question about the acceptability of the president's actions, which can be seen as a genuine inquiry without targeting or offending any specific group.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not fall into any of the other categories as it does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It is a simple statement that Rhea Butler is Clay Aiken, which is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it should be classified as "Neutral".
The correct ans... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. The author is expressing their distrust towards mainstream media and seeking recommendations for unbiased news sources. There is no explicit attack, abuse, or demeaning of any specific group based on characteristics such as ethnic o... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. While it mentions the sexual orientation of the person's babies, it does not include any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical harm towards individuals or... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. It simply reports on a criminal case where a man was found guilty of murder using a baseball bat. There is no language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is simply stating a hashtag, #stopwadhwa2015, and providing a reason for it, which is the person's alleged ties to gamergate and reliance on their support. There is no rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity present in the post.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It discusses the political and legal barriers that prevent the implementation of Sharia Law in Malaysia and Indonesia. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
T... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of some identifying trait or characteristic. Although it discusses the killing of human beings and criticizes the country's attitude towards human life, it do... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post targets people with physical disabilities by encouraging them to volunteer and help out others with different abilities. This message is inclusive and supportive, aiming to empower individuals with physical disabilities to contribute to their community. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language, ma... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is a message from Rabbi Avini Rabin on 9/11, encouraging people to "steady their hearts." It does not contain any harmful or offensive content and is therefore considered benign. The post specifically targets the Jewish community, as it is a message from a rabbi, but it does not express any harmful intent or u... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not specifically target any particular group or entity based on their innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation. It simply expresses a lack of understanding or agreement with the concept of diversity without using bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not fall into any of the other categories. It does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. The content of the post is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not target or offend any specific group of people. It is a neutral statement expressing a preference for not wanting a certain group of individuals to come, without making any derogatory or biased remarks about them.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It simply states a belief about the topic of discussion on the platform. Therefore, it falls into the category of Neutral as it is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their religion. The mention of the "Church brain" and "God help us" does not humiliate, taunt, discriminate, or... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it mentions the shooting of a black person and a black reverend speaking, it does not attack or discriminate against any specific race or group. Instead, it discusses the need for change and expresses a positive outlook on ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post targets the Muslim group by addressing Islam and Muslims specifically. However, it is labeled as benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive content. Instead, it suggests that there is no reason to fear Islam and Muslims, promoting a positive and tolerant perspective.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post targets red-haired people by making a joke about their hair color. It refers to them as "ginger" and plays on the word by suggesting they could form a band called "ginger jam." While some red-haired people might not appreciate being called "ginger," the post does not contain any rudeness, disrespect, or toxici... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not fall into any of the other categories mentioned. It does not direct abuse at any identity, affiliation, or person. It simply expresses a personal emotion and experience of being rejected from college, which is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it is classified as neutral... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post targets Jonathan, a non-Hispanic white person, by calling him a "RACIST bigot" and criticizing him for not having friends outside of Europe. However, the language used is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious, and does not specifically target Jonathan based on his race or any other innate characteristic. T... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any offensive sentiment. It simply expresses a need to focus on oneself and not dwell on past or future events. The mention of Southend and Oxford indicates a possible reference to a football match, but it does not target any specific group or entity in a negative or offensive way. Therefore, ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post contains a direct attack on a specific group of people, Muslims, based on their religious affiliation. The post refers to the person as a "Cultist" and uses a derogatory term "Muzzie." Therefore, it should be classified as Hate.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not target any specific religious group or entity, such as Christians, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Mormons, or Muslims. It criticizes someone's statement about Christian morality's influence on medical fields, but it does not use bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language towards any particular... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post is classified as Not Offensive because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is a simple request to add a filter to toggle showing phone-verified accounts in clients, which requires a development policy update. The post does not display rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity towards any in... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It is a concept or theory called "self-fulfilling prophecy" which is unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it falls into the category of "Neutral."
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. The post is simply sharing an article about Thierry Henry, a former striker, speaking on BBC Newsnight about online abuse. The content of the post is sports-related and does not involve any l... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post is classified as neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased language towards any group of people. It simply describes a method implemented to prevent infanticide and provide care and opportunities for children who are left at these centers.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. Although it uses strong language and includes a vulgar term, it is not directed towards a specific individual or group in a derogatory manner. Therefore, it can be classified as Not Offensive.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post is a cross-post from the subreddit r/GetMotivated, indicating that the content of the post is likely motivational or inspirational in nature. The post itself does not contain any offensive sentiment or rude language, nor does it target any specific group or entity. Therefore, it can be classified as Not Offen... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post targets the specified group of middle eastern individuals by mentioning that the person's family and friends are foreign nationals. However, the text does not contain any harmful or offensive language towards this group, making it a benign post.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does target women by making a negative comment about a specific woman being stupid. However, it does not meet the definition of hate speech as it is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious. It is simply a remark about one individual and does not generalize or attack women as a whole. Therefore, the post is l... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post is classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased language against any group of people. It simply discusses the current representation of women in the STEM field and encourages them to persevere despite potential challenges. The post does not target or discriminate against any speci... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The provided post does not contain any direct attacks on people based on protected characteristics. Although it includes the names of individuals involved in a debate, it does not make any derogatory or harmful comments about them or any specific group. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Not Hate" based on the g... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is simply a personal statement about the individual's busy schedule and their efforts to organize their life. There is no rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity present in the post. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive."
The correct answer ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not specifically target or offend any particular group of people. The writer is expressing their opinions on the topic of illegal immigration and the actions of the government, but they are not expressing any biased or offensive views towards a specific group.
... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While it may express disagreement or disagreement with someone's views on environmentalism, it does not attack, demean, insult, or dehumanize any group. Therefore, it can... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse at an identity, an affiliation, or an identifiable person. It is a neutral and unrelated comment, potentially slang or colloquial language, that does not promote abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post expresses a personal dislike for Facebook and the negative emotions it elicits. However, it does not contain any offensive language or target any specific group or entity. The post is simply a personal opinion and does not express any disrespect or rudeness towards anyone, making it not offensive.
The correc... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. While it expresses the hurtful experiences of the author and the lack of intervention by teachers, it does not attack, demean, insult, or abuse any specific group based on characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not fall into any of the defined categories as it does not direct abuse at an identity, affiliation, or individual. It is a neutral comment unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is a benign question about gender identity, specifically asking for clarification on whether the person will have a vagina or a penis. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language and does not target the LGBTQ community with harmful intent or stereotypes. Therefore, it is labeled as benign and targets... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not target any specific group or entity based on their actual or perceived innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. It discusses the issue of bigotry and hypocrisy in a general manner without specifically attacking o... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics or promote hate. It is a request for reliable sources to explore a particular school of thought regarding the disproportionate representation of Jews in positions of power. While the topic may be sensitive, the post does not attack, ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does contain derogatory language ("stupid" and "faggot") but it does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics as defined in the Hate definition. The post is criticizing someone's response to a point and making a sarcastic comment about it, but it does not specifically target an... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any attack on people based on protected characteristics. It simply reports the conviction of a white Chicago police officer for the shooting of a black teenager. The post does not target any specific group or entity, and therefore does not meet the criteria for being classified as "Hate."
T... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. The author is discussing being doxxed and flamed, but there are no specific references to any protected characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, etc. Therefore, it does not qualify as hate speech.
The correct answer is ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse towards an identity, an affiliation, or an identifiable person. It also does not promote or express any form of abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The given post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Though it mentions being doxxed and flamed, there is no specific targeting of any particular group or entity related to any protected characteristic. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Although it includes derogatory language ("retarded liberals"), it does not specifically target individuals based on their race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic. Therefore, it can be... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The provided post is a YouTube video link with the word "Cunt" as the text. While the term used is offensive, it does not contain a direct attack on people based on any protected characteristics mentioned in the definition of Hate. Therefore, this post should be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of some identifying trait or characteristic. It also does not contain language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as Not Offensive because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It discusses a strategy to address violence against women by advocating for public shame of abusers and public support for victims. The post does not engage in rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity, and it do... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While it may express animosity or derogation towards a certain group, it does not explicitly attack, demean, or insult any specific group based on these characteristics. ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post targets men by making a sarcastic remark about them ("here go men again"). However, the language used is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious. It does not attack men based on their innate characteristics, such as gender. Therefore, the post qualifies as Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It also does not promote hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Instead, it makes a general statement about the country's historical association with fascism and comments on contemporary writ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is a simple one-word response of "no," which does not contain any abusive language or target any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It is a neutral statement that does not fall into any of the other categories of abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The provided post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It is a video titled "Tucker Carlson VS Cenk Uygur from the Young Turks Debate of the Century at Politicon Golden State Times" and includes the phrase "Junk Wigger is a TurkEY." While the term "Junk Wigger" may be offensi... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post is classified as Neutral because it does not fall into any of the other categories. It is a statement expressing the opinion that old psychiatric hospitals do not allow the general public to visit and observe the patients. There is no abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance directed towards any specific identi... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it uses strong language and expresses frustration with President Trump, it does not target any specific group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or other protected characteristics. Therefore, it does not ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not target women in any harmful or offensive manner. It does not contain any offensive language, insults, or personal attacks. It does not express any harmful intent towards women or use stereotypes or lewd manners. Therefore, it can be classified as a benign post.
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While the post discusses someone's role and their opinions about the German people, it does not attack, demean, insult, or express abuse towards any specific group. There... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post falls under the label "Neutral" because it does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It simply discusses the differences in time and resources devoted by male and female applicants in achieving work status. It does not promote hate, prejudice, intolerance, or any form of abuse.
... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their gender or any other identifying trait or characteristic. The post simply recounts a personal experience of watching a show with a gay love story wher... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as "Not Offensive" because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It provides factual information about the killing of 6 senior ISIS leaders in an airstrike in Kirkuk, Iraq. The post does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity towards any individual or grou... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It simply states a fact about Judaism and its people, without attacking, demeaning, or insulting them. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answe... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. While it expresses a sarcastic and dismissive tone towards a certain group of people, it does not attack or insult them based on their ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Ha... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is benign because it is simply stating that the person posting is also Asian, which is related to the topic being discussed. There is no harmful or offensive language used, and there is no intent to target or insult the Chinese group specifically. Therefore, the post does not fall under the toxic category.
T... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It may express frustration towards football fans, but it does not attack, demean, insult, abuse, or dehumanize them based on their characteristics. Therefore, the approp... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is a positive comment expressing love towards someone (@user). Although it uses abbreviations and informal language, it does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Not Offensive."
The correct ... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against a specific group of people. The writer discusses their understanding of the protest against Monsanto and the controversy surrounding GMOs, but they do not express any hateful or offensive views towards any group... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Although it mentions the nightclub being called "Schindlers" and making a reference to a mysterious fire, it does not target any specific group or entity based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or any other protected characteri... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It may use playful language and slang, but it is not disrespectful or toxic towards any specific individual or group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive".
The correct answer is no | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It is a statement about attending a rally and includes hashtags related to a conspiracy theory and a political slogan. While the content may be polarizing or controversial, it does not target any specific group or entity based on... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or biased statements against a specific group of people. The post simply discusses the issue of the Kashmir dispute and raises questions about India's reluctance to conduct a referendum. While the post may express a viewpoint a... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | The post is classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into either the Offensive or Hate categories. The mention of "Isaiah Simmons" and "football Jesus" does not target, incite violence against, threaten, or call for physical damage to an individual or group of people based on their religio... | |
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throug... | This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It simply discusses the perception of bias by "abcnews" towards conservatives and questions the legitimacy of a donation. There is no targeted group or entity that is relevant to the definition of hate, therefore this post should... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 15