Download README.md from zoom-ai/contested-fast-decisions: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 12.7 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/zoom-ai/contested-fast-decisions/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/zoom-ai/contested-fast-decisions/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/zoom-ai/contested-fast-decisions/resolve/main/README.md
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
task_categories:
- text-classification
pretty_name: Contested Fast Decisions
size_categories:
- n<1K
tags:
- classification
- multi-task
- decision-model
- routing
- adversarial-filtering
source_datasets:
- fastino/fast-decisions
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files: data/train.jsonl
default: true
Contested Fast Decisions: A Benchmark of Contested Operational Decisions
Contested Fast Decisions is a benchmark of 818 operational decisions (routing, triage and
classification) over 696 texts in 17 domains, on which current models do not reliably agree. Every label
was re-checked. It is derived from the development split of
fastino/fast-decisions.
Leaderboard
Decision models, queried through their API with one choice question per single-label decision and one yes/no noul
question per label for multi-label decisions, given only the task name and candidate labels (no label descriptions).
| Model | Accuracy | Single-label | Multi-label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 73.7% | 73.7% | 73.8% | |
| 69.3% | 67.9% | 74.3% | |
| 66.5% | 67.6% | 62.8% | |
| 66.3% | 64.4% | 72.7% | |
| 66.0% | 68.5% | 57.4% | |
| 65.2% | 66.6% | 60.1% | |
| 63.2% | 64.4% | 59.0% | |
| 62.7% | 63.5% | 60.1% | |
| 62.6% | 65.5% | 52.5% | |
| 61.0% | 64.4% | 49.2% | |
| 60.6% | 61.4% | 57.9% | |
| 60.1% | 60.3% | 59.6% | |
| 60.1% | 63.1% | 49.7% | |
| 57.2% | 58.4% | 53.0% | |
| 56.2% | 58.3% | 49.2% | |
| 56.0% | 57.2% | 51.9% | |
| 55.7% | 59.1% | 44.3% | |
| 54.4% | 60.9% | 31.7% | |
| 49.9% | 54.0% | 35.5% | |
| 46.2% | 51.3% | 28.4% | |
| 45.8% | 49.1% | 34.4% | |
| 45.1% | 55.4% | 9.3% |
How it was built
Starting from the fastino/fast-decisions dev split (1,700 texts, 2,900 decisions):
- Keep the contested decisions. Eight fixed filter models answer every decision (gpt-6-luna, Gemma 4 31B-it, gpt-5.6-luna, JEV (jev-1.13.0), Qwen3.8-27B, Qwen3.6-27B, Qwen3.5-9B, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B; all without extended thinking). Decisions on which all eight give the same answer are discarded; the 983 on which they do not all agree are kept.
- Relabel them. The original labels are unreliable (for example, a tennis recap with a clear winner labelled
draw), so each kept decision is labelled again, independently, bygpt-6-sol(default reasoning) and Claude Opus 5 (default thinking), from the same prompt and without seeing the original label or any model's answer. They agree on 686; that label is used. - Resolve disagreements. The remaining 297 (the labellers disagreed, or Opus 5 declined to answer) were reviewed one at a time by Claude Opus 5.5, which set the label for 132 and judged 165 too ambiguous to label; those are dropped.
Because every decision was contested, each is answered wrong by at least one filter model. The filter models only select the data; any model can be evaluated on exactly these decisions.
424 of the 818 labels (51.8%) differ from the original
dataset. Each decision keeps its original label in original_label.
Data format
A single file, data/train.jsonl, with one JSON object per text. Only the text's hard decisions are included, so a text can
carry fewer decisions than in the original dataset.
{
"id": "sports_recap/2",
"category": "sports_recap",
"input": "<free text>",
"output": {
"classifications": [
{
"task": "sport",
"true_label": [
"basketball"
],
"labels": [
"football",
"basketball",
"baseball",
"soccer",
"tennis",
"cricket",
"motorsport",
"other"
],
"multi_label": false,
"original_label": [
"other"
],
"label_source": "labeller_agreement"
}
]
}
}
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
id |
<category>/<line>: the text's line number (0-based) in fastino/fast-decisions <category>.jsonl; the category is also in the category field |
input |
the text, unchanged from the source dataset |
task, labels, multi_label |
the decision and its full candidate label set, unchanged from the source dataset |
true_label |
the verified gold label(s); always a list |
original_label |
the label in fastino/fast-decisions |
label_source |
labeller_agreement (gpt-6-sol and Claude Opus 5 agreed; 686 decisions) or adjudication (set by Claude Opus 5.5; 132 decisions) |
| Domain | Texts | Decisions |
|---|---|---|
ticket_route |
77 | 121 |
email_triage |
62 | 101 |
restaurant_review |
79 | 86 |
product_feedback |
71 | 78 |
screen_tags |
53 | 64 |
clinic_request |
41 | 47 |
sports_recap |
37 | 44 |
benefits_request |
43 | 44 |
news_topic |
35 | 35 |
support_topic |
34 | 34 |
travel_request |
34 | 34 |
support_intent |
30 | 30 |
banking_intent |
28 | 28 |
paper_field |
23 | 23 |
agent_handoff |
18 | 18 |
review_sentiment |
16 | 16 |
document_type |
15 | 15 |
| Total | 696 | 818 |
635 decisions are single-label and 183 are multi-label (product_area, aspects,
genres).
Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("zoom-ai/contested-fast-decisions", split="train") # all domains
email = ds.filter(lambda r: r["category"] == "email_triage")
Evaluation
Exact match per decision: a prediction is correct only if the predicted label set equals true_label (compared as
sets). Report plain accuracy over all 818 decisions; per-domain counts are small (15 to 121), so per-domain
averages are noisy.
License and attribution
Apache 2.0, following the source dataset. If you use this dataset, please cite it:
@misc{xu2026contestedfastdecisions,
title={Contested Fast Decisions: A Benchmark of Contested Operational Decisions},
author={Silei Xu, Linyong Nan},
year={2026},
publisher={Hugging Face},
howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/zoom-ai/contested-fast-decisions}},
}
Texts, tasks and candidate labels come from
fastino/fast-decisions; please cite it as well:
@misc{zaratiana2025gliner2efficientmultitaskinformation,
title={GLiNER2: An Efficient Multi-Task Information Extraction System with Schema-Driven Interface},
author={Urchade Zaratiana and Gil Pasternak and Oliver Boyd and George Hurn-Maloney and Ash Lewis},
year={2025},
eprint={2507.18546},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18546},
}
Last updated: 10/16/2026