license: mit
library_name: pytorch
pipeline_tag: time-series-forecasting
tags:
- tropical-cyclone
- weather-forecasting
- pytorch
- era5
- ibtracs
Typhoon Predict β tropical-cyclone forecasting
Research models β not an operational warning system. Do not use for evacuation, aviation, maritime, or emergency decisions.
Current best model: TrackFormer v23
TrackFormer v23 predicts the atmospheric steering flow that carries a storm as an explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) intermediate step, conditions that estimate on how the flow has been evolving over the previous day (t-24h, t-12h, now), and derives track from it. Result: 434.96 km RMS track error (10-seed ensemble), WP+EP 2020+, full 20-lead-horizon test set (3,763 windows).
This is the best-performing model in the whole project, reached through a longer architecture progression:
- v10βv20 β a small CNN encoder reads a deep-layer-mean steering-wind patch around the storm.
- v21, v22 β chain-of-thought: predict the steering flow itself, then derive track from it (v22 adds a latent CoT with weight-tied feedback rounds).
- v23 β add a temporal history of the CoT steering representation. Best result: 434.96 km.
- v24βv29 β four further environmental additions on top of v23 (an environmental token, an ocean-heat CNN patch, a drift adapter, raw ERA5 steering wind) all came back null: once a CoT representation already extracts the steering signal that matters, handing the model the raw field again is redundant.
- v31βv34 β land/terrain-interaction correction, motivated by real-world reports of typhoons stalling at mountainous coastlines (Typhoon Gaemi, 2024, at Taiwan) and terrain-deflection literature (AOT-TCNet, arXiv 2603.29200):
| model | aggregate track (km) | Typhoon Tip 1979 (km) | Typhoon Noul 2026, ocean/landfall (km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| v23 (baseline) | 434.96 | 939 | 267 / 356 |
| v31 β LandDrag, uniform training | 443.07 (+8.11) | β | β |
| v32 β LandDrag, window-oversampled | 460.48 (+25.52, backfired) | β | β |
| v33 β LandDrag, storm-normalized | 442.33 (+7.37) | 876 | 243 / 319 |
| v34 β LandGate, frozen v23 backbone | 460.52 (β0.33 vs. own backbone) | 795 | 287 / 382 |
v34 is the methodologically important result: v31βv33 each retrained the entire architecture from scratch, so their deltas vs. v23 include ~19 km/seed of ordinary retrain noise on top of whatever the land correction did. v34 instead freezes a real, already-trained v23 checkpoint and trains only a new ~437-parameter gated correction β a true same-backbone-plus-one-addition comparison. Result: essentially null everywhere, including the mountainous-near-land regime every earlier attempt targeted. On the two real out-of-training storms available, v33 and v34 each split 1β1 against v23 β a small-n disagreement with the aggregate test set, not a reliable effect.
Methodological lessons: retrain-to-retrain seed noise (~19 km/seed) is large enough to manufacture or hide most small version-to-version deltas; freezing a real backbone and training only a small addition isolates a causal effect that comparing two from-scratch runs cannot; and a large in-distribution aggregate test set does not always agree with genuinely out-of-training real-storm validation.
v23's 10-seed ensemble is released in this repo (v23_seed0.ptβv23_seed9.pt, fp32, 52.6 MB
each) with a standalone architecture module and CLI β see "Usage β v23" below. Full write-up,
architecture equations, and every intermediate result: paper/trackformer.pdf, "Chain-of-thought
steering and land-interaction testing," in the GitHub repo
(https://github.com/yu314-coder/typhoon-predict).
Usage β v23
Two modes, controlled by whether you pass --steering:
IBTrACS-only (default) β give it nothing but the storm's own recent track (position, max wind, central pressure). This is what any best-track record gives you for a storm, nothing more. The steering field and its 12h/24h history are zero-filled with an explicit availability flag β the same "unavailable == exact zeros, not fabricated" convention used throughout this project.
python run_v23.py --track my_storm.json --out forecast.json
Full data β additionally supply a real deep-layer-mean steering-wind patch (850/500/200 hPa u/v, 2.5Β° resolution, Β±20Β° box centered on the storm) for the current fix and, ideally, the two fixes 12h/24h before it. This is what the headline 434.96 km result requires.
python run_v23.py --track my_storm.json --steering my_steering.npz --out forecast.json
my_storm.json: a list of fixes, oldestβnewest, spaced 6h apart, ending at the fix to forecast
from β see run_v23.py's docstring for the exact schema. my_steering.npz: keyed by the same ISO
timestamps; the GitHub repo's _fetch_dolphin_steering.py is a complete working example of
building one from NOAA/NOMADS GFS analysis fields for a live storm (ERA5 works the same way for a
past one).
How much does the steering field matter? Tested on Typhoon Dolphin (2026, active as of this writing): with real fetched GFS steering, v23's 120h forecast was 14.7Β°N,150.7Β°E / 99 kt / 951 hPa; with the steering field zeroed out (IBTrACS-only) it was 17.5Β°N,156.3Β°E / 90 kt / 957 hPa β the track moved by several hundred km while intensity only softened modestly. So on this storm the steering field mainly earns its keep on track, not intensity.
Released checkpoints: StormFusion-MT & TrackFormer v1βv9
The earlier, fully released and locally-runnable line. Each predicts, at 20 six-hourly lead times (6β120 h), a 17-dim state per lead: east/north storm motion (km), max wind (kt), central pressure (hPa), radius of max wind (km), and 34/50/64-kt wind radii in four quadrants.
| model | params | inputs | training data |
|---|---|---|---|
| TrackFormer v9 | 17M (fp16, 33MB) | track history + IBTrACS environment, protected triple-stream | all basins, 1980+, 193k partial-lead windows |
| TrackFormer v8 | 15M (fp16, 30MB) | track history only, protected dual-stream | all basins, 1980+, 193k partial-lead windows |
| StormFusion-MT v2 | 3.3M (fp16, 6.7MB) | ERA5 patches + track history | WP, 2000+, 1,337 storm-centered windows |
| TrackFormer (v1) | 21M (fp16, 43MB) | track history only (single-stream) | all basins, 1980+, 84,150 windows |
Weights and full reproducible code (dataset builders, training, eval) are in the GitHub repo
(models/).
Results β WP 2020+ held-out test (lower is better)
| model | track km | vmax kt | pres hPa | rmw km | radius km |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StormFusion-MT v2 (3.3M, ERA5) | 729 | 24.2 | 21.6 | 16.2 | 31.8 |
| TrackFormer v1 (21M, single-stream) | 720 | 22.1 | 21.2 | 11.8 | 31.5 |
| TrackFormer v3 (15M, dual-stream) | 659 | 21.6 | 18.1 | 11.8 | 28.8 |
| TrackFormer v8 (15M, +partial-lead data) | 649 | 20.7 | 15.9 | 11.3 | 27.8 |
| TrackFormer v9 (17M, +IBTrACS environment) | 618 | 18.6 | 15.8 | 11.5 | 27.2 |
Key findings. (1) A track-only model that never sees ERA5 matches or beats the full ERA5
model, so data diversity > engineered features > parameters (a 17.7M ERA5 model overfit and did
worse than the 3.3M one). (2) Naively adding motion-dynamics features to a single-stream model
improves intensity but hurts track through negative transfer; TrackFormer v3 fixes this with a
protected dual-stream architecture (separate kinematic/thermodynamic encoders, gradient routing, a
zero-init gated thermoβtrack adapter, and a persistence-residual track head), cutting WP-2020+ track
error to 659 km (β61, storm-bootstrap 95% CI [β103, β16] km, pβ0.995) while keeping the intensity
gains. Full architecture and derivation (incl. a random-matrix block-covariance uncertainty head) in
paper/trackformer.pdf, Appendix A, in the GitHub repo.
Architectures
- StormFusion-MT v2 β separate inner/outer ERA5 conv encoders keeping a 3Γ3 grid of spatial tokens, track/environment token encoders, a temporal Transformer context, learned + sinusoidal lead-time queries, cross-attention decoding, and multi-task state / log-scale heads.
- TrackFormer β the same decoder design, track-only: a 40-dim track-history projection β Transformer context (d_model 384, 8 heads, 4+6 layers) β lead queries β dual heads. No atmospheric inputs.
Usage
See the GitHub repo for model_v2.py / train_track.py, the checkpoints, and normalization
stats. Inputs are per-feature standardized (stats saved with each checkpoint / dataset);
multiply predictions by TARGET_SCALE = [100,100,35,20,50] + [50]*12 for physical units.
Data
IBTrACS v04r01 best tracks (NOAA NCEI) and ERA5 reanalysis (Copernicus/ECMWF). Obtain the source data under its own access and licensing terms.
Limitations
- Research models throughout β not operational quality in either line. TrackFormer v23 (434.96 km RMS track error, 6β120 h) and the released StormFusion-MT/TrackFormer v1βv9 checkpoints (~618β730 km, different test split) are both far from operational.
- v24βv34 (the further additions and land-interaction line built on top of v23) remain research artifacts, not packaged for this card's load/run format β only v23 itself is released.
- The real ceiling is storm diversity (~13k storms have ever existed); larger models overfit.
- Wind-radius labels are sparse; no calibration or comparison against official agency forecasts.
- Pre-satellite track/intensity labels are lower quality.