FF_3.1

FF_3.1 is a 2.02B parameter GPT-2 decoder-only language model trained from scratch with a multi-stage pipeline combining supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, knowledge distillation, and instruction tuning.

Model Details

Architecture GPT-2 decoder-only
Parameters 2.02B
Hidden size (d) 2048
Attention heads (h) 16
FFN size (ff) 8192
Layers (L) 38
Context length 2048
Tokenizer GPT-2 BPE (vocab size: 50,257)
Precision bfloat16

Training Pipeline

FF_3.1 was trained through a 5-stage pipeline:

  1. Pretraining โ€” 90B tokens on a large English corpus
  2. SFT โ€” 760K + 100K examples (OpenHermes-2.5 / NuminaMath / Eurus)
  3. DPO โ€” 38,863 preference pairs
  4. Distillation v3 โ€” 47K examples targeting MMLU + GSM8K + ARC benchmarks
  5. LoRA v4b โ€” 10K examples for instruction following refinement

Evaluation

Benchmark Score
MMLU (5-shot) 27.94% (+3.94 pp vs FF_3 baseline of 24%)

Usage

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("francescofiamingo1/FF_3.1", torch_dtype="bfloat16")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("francescofiamingo1/FF_3.1")

input_text = "Explain photosynthesis in simple terms."
inputs = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=256, temperature=0.7, do_sample=True)
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))

Known Limitations

  • Math reasoning is still weak โ€” the model struggles with multi-step arithmetic and word problems
  • Instruction count following is imprecise โ€” the model may not reliably follow constraints like "list exactly 5 items"

What's Next

FF_3.2 will focus on:

  • DPO with UltraFeedback dataset for improved preference alignment
  • Improved math dataset for stronger quantitative reasoning

License

Apache 2.0

Downloads last month
31
Safetensors
Model size
2B params
Tensor type
BF16
ยท
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. ๐Ÿ™‹ Ask for provider support

Evaluation results