Clarify SegFormer-B0 evaluation caveats
#2
by masteroshi006 - opened
- segformer-b0/README.md +8 -0
segformer-b0/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -55,6 +55,14 @@ requires spatial dimensions divisible by 32, so this model was trained and
|
|
| 55 |
evaluated at 416 × 416. The comparison is therefore not resolution-aligned, as
|
| 56 |
already flagged on the GitHub PR.
|
| 57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
## Evaluate
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
```bash
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
evaluated at 416 × 416. The comparison is therefore not resolution-aligned, as
|
| 56 |
already flagged on the GitHub PR.
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
## Caveats
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
- The IGN test evaluation contains positive images only; false positives on
|
| 61 |
+
negative scenes are not measured.
|
| 62 |
+
- This is a single run with seed 42, so seed-to-seed variability is unknown.
|
| 63 |
+
- The test metrics are pixel-aggregated; the reference-protocol row above is
|
| 64 |
+
included separately for comparison with the published DeepLab baseline.
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
## Evaluate
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
```bash
|