HobbyLM-1B

A 1.037B-parameter sparse mixture-of-experts language model trained from scratch on 100B tokens, with approximately 305M parameters active per token. This repository holds the final annealed base model.
HobbyLM by Fuel Labs

Instruct | GGUF | Checkpoints | Online Demo | GitHub | Windows App

Highlights

• Sparse MoE, trained from scratch: 1.037B total parameters, approximately 305M active per token (64 routed experts + 1 shared expert, top-8 routing), pretrained on 100B tokens.
• Open release: the final annealed base (this repository), the instruction-tuned model, the 4K context-extension checkpoint and GGUF files, all under Apache-2.0.
• Runs on an ordinary CPU: GGUF files, patched llama.cpp and Ollama runtimes, and a double-click chat app for Windows.
• Measured, with its limits stated: a release evaluation of the base and instruction-tuned models, plus function calling (BFCL) and instruction following (IFEval), with setup and provenance.

Model List

Model	Format	Where	Notes
HobbyLM-1B (base)	Transformers, fp32	this repository (root files)	final annealed base (step 95,367), 1024 context
HobbyLM-1B Instruct	Transformers, fp32	hobbylm-1B-instruct	Instruction-tuned, 4096 context; runs in the online demo
Checkpoints	Transformers, fp32	hobbylm-1b-checkpoints	base-anneal-final, context-4k-step150, sft-step3450
GGUF	F32 / Q8_0 / Q4_K_M	hobbylm-1B-gguf	Instruct in three precisions plus base F32; needs a patched runtime
Windows chat app and runtimes	ZIP	GitHub release v1.0.0	double-click chat app; patched llama.cpp and Ollama for Windows x64 CPU

Use the tested Quickstart instructions below. Hugging Face’s automatic ‘Use this model’ snippets are not validated for HobbyLM. Our GGUF release requires the supplied patched runtimes. Stock Ollama v0.35.1 failed our loading test; LM Studio, Docker Model Runner, vLLM and SGLang have not been validated.

Model Information

Parameters	1,037,121,536 total; 304,953,344 active per token (embeddings counted once; tied LM head)
Weights	model.safetensors, float32. Raw training checkpoint 1b_flagship/model.pt, SHA-256 947e80d903f3b2bf9e55af9eee785dfa49740b2d4b851bc564fc1e65e085f843
Export identity	Verified (2026-10-06): all 279 stored tensors are bit-for-bit identical to the raw checkpoint after conversion. The tied lm_head is not stored separately.
Precision	fp32 only (see "Precision")
Tokenizer	GPT-2 BPE (50,257 tokens; embedding matrix padded to 50,304 rows). `<
Context	1024 tokens (pretraining sequence length)

Component	Value
Layers	20 (layer 0 dense SwiGLU, intermediate 2816; layers 1–19 MoE)
Experts	64 routed (intermediate 224) + 1 shared; top-8 routed per token
Router	sigmoid gating with aux-loss-free bias balancing (DeepSeek-V3 style)
Attention	GQA, 16 query heads / 8 KV heads, head dim 128, per-head QK RMSNorm
Position	plain RoPE, theta 10000, no scaling
Hidden size / norm	1024 / RMSNorm (eps 1e-6)
Embeddings	tied input embedding / LM head

Introduction

HobbyLM-1B is a compact sparse mixture-of-experts language model developed by Fuel Labs. It was trained from scratch on 100B tokens to study how much capability can be developed within a comparatively small active-parameter budget.

The files at the root of this repository are the final annealed base model: the end of pretraining after the anneal (step 95,367). It continues text: it is not instruction-tuned, not preference-tuned and not safety-aligned. For chat, extraction, rewriting and single function calls, use HobbyLM-1B Instruct, or try it in the online demo.

Base-Model Benchmark Context

The following figures place selected HobbyLM Base results alongside public results reported for compact peer models. Scores are percentages and higher is better. Peer evaluations come from public model cards and technical reports; implementations may differ across sources. The source notes and scale treatment are included directly in each figure.

What Changed After Instruction Tuning

The instruction-tuned model (HobbyLM-1B Instruct) improves several release-evaluation results under the matched float32, zero-shot protocol shown below. This is a selected view of positive movements, not a composite score or a claim that every benchmark improved; the complete results and regressions remain in the evaluation table that follows.

Evaluation Results

Five evaluation runs. Runs R and A cover both release models, all 0-shot, with lm-evaluation-harness 0.4.13 in float32. Run C covers the base model (revision a5bb6bcd). Run B is the BFCL v4 single-turn function-calling evaluation of the instruction-tuned model, using its trained tool-calling prompt layout. Run I is IFEval for the instruction-tuned model: all 541 prompts, official lm-eval 0.4.13 scoring, the model's chat template, greedy decoding, 2,048-token response budget.

Benchmark	Metric / shots	Base	Instruct
HellaSwag	acc_norm · 0-shot	43.66	46.64
ARC-Easy	acc_norm · 0-shot	54.76	54.12
↳ ARC-Easy (second metric)	acc · 0-shot	61.20	—
ARC-Challenge	acc_norm · 0-shot	29.27	28.41
PIQA	acc_norm · 0-shot	67.85	68.88
WinoGrande	acc · 0-shot	52.41	50.75
OpenBookQA	acc_norm · 0-shot	35.00	36.20
BoolQ	acc · 0-shot	49.82	53.36
SIQA	acc · 0-shot	40.89	40.33
CommonsenseQA	acc · 0-shot	19.98	18.18
SciQ	acc · 0-shot	82.90	82.70
↳ SciQ (second metric)	acc_norm · 0-shot	75.80	77.10
MMLU	acc · 0-shot	25.31	24.78
MMLU	accuracy · 5-shot	25.36	—
GPQA-Diamond	accuracy · 0-shot	26.77	—
BFCL simple (simple_python)	AST accuracy · 0-shot	—	59.00
BFCL multiple	AST accuracy · 0-shot	—	56.00
BFCL irrelevance	irrelevance (official rule) · 0-shot	—	2.50
IFEval, prompt-level strict	accuracy · 0-shot	—	22.92
IFEval, instruction-level strict	accuracy · 0-shot	—	37.77
IFEval, prompt-level loose	accuracy · 0-shot	—	24.95
IFEval, instruction-level loose	accuracy · 0-shot	—	40.53

Scores are percentages. Base = the final annealed base model in this repository; Instruct = HobbyLM-1B Instruct. Task versions, example counts, the run behind each score and standard errors are in Detailed results below the table.

Detailed results: task versions, example counts, run (R, A, C, B, I), standard errors and Instruct − base differences

Benchmark	Metric	Shots	lm-eval task version	Examples (each model)	Run	Base, % ± SE	Instruct, % ± SE	Instruct − base, percentage points
HellaSwag	acc_norm	0	1.0	10,042	R	43.66 ± 0.49	46.64 ± 0.50	+2.99
ARC-Easy	acc_norm	0	1.0	2,376	R	54.76 ± 1.02	54.12 ± 1.02	−0.63
↳ ARC-Easy (second metric)	acc	0	—	—	C	61.20	—	—
ARC-Challenge	acc_norm	0	1.0	1,172	R	29.27 ± 1.33	28.41 ± 1.32	−0.85
PIQA	acc_norm	0	1.0	1,838	R	67.85 ± 1.09	68.88 ± 1.08	+1.03
WinoGrande	acc	0	1.0	1,267	R	52.41 ± 1.40	50.75 ± 1.41	−1.66
OpenBookQA	acc_norm	0	1.0	500	R	35.00 ± 2.14	36.20 ± 2.15	+1.20
BoolQ	acc	0	2.0	3,270	R	49.82 ± 0.87	53.36 ± 0.87	+3.55
SIQA	acc	0	0.0	1,954	A	40.89 ± 1.11	40.33 ± 1.11	−0.56
CommonsenseQA	acc	0	not declared	1,221	A	19.98 ± 1.14	18.18 ± 1.10	−1.80
SciQ	acc	0	1.0	1,000	A	82.90 ± 1.19	82.70 ± 1.20	−0.20
↳ SciQ, same 1,000 questions (second metric)	acc_norm	0	1.0	1,000	A	75.80 ± 1.36	77.10 ± 1.33	+1.30
MMLU (0-shot)	acc	0	group 2 (subtasks 1.0)	14,042	A	25.31 ± 0.37	24.78 ± 0.36	−0.53
MMLU (5-shot)	accuracy	5	—	—	C	25.36	—	—
GPQA-Diamond	accuracy	0	custom gpqa_diamond_zeroshot_fixed	—	C	26.77	—	—
BFCL simple (simple_python)	AST accuracy	0	bfcl-eval 2026.3.23	400	B	—	59.00	—
BFCL multiple	AST accuracy	0	bfcl-eval 2026.3.23	200	B	—	56.00	—
BFCL irrelevance	irrelevance (official rule)	0	bfcl-eval 2026.3.23	240	B	—	2.50	—
IFEval, prompt-level strict	accuracy	0	lm-eval 0.4.13	541	I	—	22.92	—
IFEval, instruction-level strict	accuracy	0	lm-eval 0.4.13	541	I	—	37.77	—
IFEval, prompt-level loose	accuracy	0	lm-eval 0.4.13	541	I	—	24.95	—
IFEval, instruction-level loose	accuracy	0	lm-eval 0.4.13	541	I	—	40.53	—

How to read the table

How to read the table:

• Scores are accuracy in percent. "±" is the standard error reported by lm-evaluation-harness for each model separately.
• Differences are in percentage points, computed from unrounded scores, so they may not equal the difference of the rounded values shown.
• Observed changes only: no paired significance test was run, and no significance claim is made.
• SciQ is one benchmark with two metrics, acc and acc_norm, over the same 1,000 questions.
• MMLU (0-shot, Run A) is lm-eval's group accuracy, weighted by subject size across 57 subjects.
• No overall average is reported: the benchmarks use different metrics, chance levels and difficulty.
• Chance level: CommonsenseQA (both models) is near the five-choice uniform-random baseline (20%), and MMLU near the four-choice baseline (25%). No cause is attributed.
• Runs R and A used every example of each task's evaluation split.

Evaluation setup and provenance

Two historical figures are deliberately left out because no saved result artifact backs them:

• the 7-task average 47.61 shown on earlier revisions of this card;
• the function-calling elicitation pass@k numbers.

Scores of the Instruct model or of any other HobbyLM checkpoint do not apply to this base model.

Common setup (both runs):

• lm-evaluation-harness 0.4.13, HFLM with the model loaded via trust_remote_code=True;
• 0-shot, batch size 8, seeds 1234 (random_seed, numpy_random_seed, torch_random_seed, fewshot_random_seed);
• float32 with TF32 disabled, on one NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB (Modal);
• no chat template; this model's context is 1,024 tokens.
• Weights: base harims95/hobbylm-1b-hf (now harims95/hobbylm-1B, this repository) @ a5bb6bcdab3642acbb203c2b6b6c272669da3693; instruct harims95/hobbylm-1b-broad-sft-3450-hf @ ddf46d8f9c651ca3d0a73bb3189a7dc9a9112ce5, the same weights as harims95/hobbylm-1B-instruct.
• Tokenizer: the release tokenizer files staged for this repo.

Run R: setup and provenance limitations

• Software: Python 3.11, torch 2.4.1+cu121, transformers 4.46.3, accelerate 1.1.1, safetensors 0.4.5. The datasets and evaluate versions were not recorded.

• Datasets (as configured by lm-eval 0.4.13; revisions not pinned or recorded):

  Task	Dataset	Split
  HellaSwag	Rowan/hellaswag	validation
  ARC-Easy, ARC-Challenge	allenai/ai2_arc	test
  PIQA	baber/piqa	validation
  WinoGrande	allenai/winogrande winogrande_xl	validation
  OpenBookQA	allenai/openbookqa main	test
  BoolQ	aps/super_glue boolq	validation

• Tokenizer: the runs did not record tokenizer hashes. The files published here are the current staged files (SHA-256: tokenizer.json 8414cab9…, vocab.json 19613966…, merges.txt 1ce16647…, special_tokens_map.json 259f2e7d…, tokenizer_config.json base 7e1ab496… / Instruct 2a199fc0…). Their timestamps predate the runs, but that alone does not prove they are byte-identical to what was loaded.

• Run-1 script: the evaluation script was edited after the base model's run started (the edit affected only HumanEval, which was not evaluated). Its run-time source is a reconstruction, not a captured copy.

• BoolQ truncation (base model): 1 of 3,270 BoolQ documents (doc id 3154) exceeds the base model's 1,024-token context. As pre-specified, lm-eval left-truncated it, and it stays in the score. Without it, base BoolQ is 49.83% (n = 3,269). No Instruct document exceeded 4,096 tokens.

Run A: setup and verified provenance (applies to Run A only)

These checks ran inside the Run A job, before any model was loaded. They do not cover Run R.

• Executed script: SHA-256 d54d2097…, verified in the container against the hash recorded before launch.

• Dependencies: all 90 pins of a recorded lock file verified at exact versions (torch 2.4.1, transformers 4.46.3, lm-eval 0.4.13, datasets 5.0.1, evaluate 0.4.6, huggingface-hub 0.36.2).

• Tokenizer: all 10 staged tokenizer files verified against recorded SHA-256 values.

• Models: both resolved to the pinned commits above.

• Datasets: loaded only at pinned revisions:

  Task	Dataset @ revision	Split
  SIQA	lighteval/siqa @ 54c6a1f8cb6daf4f5abf24a601852612fb35eb25	validation
  CommonsenseQA	tau/commonsense_qa @ 94630fe30dad47192a8546eb75f094926d47e155	validation
  SciQ	allenai/sciq @ 2c94ad3e1aafab77146f384e23536f97a4849815	test
  MMLU	cais/mmlu @ c30699e8356da336a370243923dbaf21066bb9fe	test

• Context: no document exceeded either model's context, so nothing was truncated.

Run I (IFEval)

• Cap hits: 135 of 541 responses (25.0%) reached the 2,048-token limit; most were flagged as repetitive by a simple heuristic.
• Training overlap: 2 prompts overlap the final instruction-tuning mix. The scores include them.

Not evaluated: GSM8K, HumanEval, MBPP, MATH-500, TriviaQA, MMLU-Pro.

Training Recipe

The full-scale run followed an earlier proxy run that exposed a data-delivery problem: source families were reaching the model in long sequential stretches. The loader was corrected and re-tested before scaling. The illustration below is conceptual; its proportions and ordering are not literal.

• Tokens and hardware: 100B tokens, trained from scratch on 4× H200 for about 76 hours. Muon optimizer, trapezoidal learning-rate schedule.
• Mix:

Source	Share	Dataset
Educational web	60%	FineWeb-Edu
Web	15%	DCLM-baseline-1.0
Code	10%	codeparrot-clean
Math	10%	FineMath (finemath-4plus)
Anneal	5%	Cosmopedia v2 (3.5B) + FineMath-4plus (1.5B)

Correction: the previous card described the anneal as "Cosmopedia + high-quality FineWeb-Edu". The data-preparation script (prepare_mix100B.py) shows Cosmopedia v2 + FineMath-4plus.

Validation loss (FineWeb validation set): 3.4112 at the end of the main pretraining phase (step 81,060), and 3.5487 at the end of the full run after the anneal (step 95,367, the run's result.json). The chart below shows the main pretraining phase only.

After pretraining: the context was extended to 2048 and then 4096 tokens, a short function-calling stage followed, and broad instruction fine-tuning ran to step 3450. Every stage uses plain RoPE. The final base, the 4K context-extension checkpoint and the instruction-tuned model, with hashes and lineage, are in hobbylm-1b-checkpoints.

Quickstart

Transformers (this base model)

trust_remote_code=True is required, and the model must stay in float32 (see Limitations). This repository has no chat template.

Executed (2026-10-06, CPU, transformers 4.46.3, model from published revision a5bb6bcd; tokenizer from the STAGED files, because they are not published yet): ran without error.

import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

repo = "harims95/hobbylm-1B"
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(repo, trust_remote_code=True, torch_dtype=torch.float32).eval()
ids = tok("The three states of matter are", return_tensors="pt").input_ids
out = model.generate(ids, attention_mask=torch.ones_like(ids), max_new_tokens=40, do_sample=False, pad_token_id=tok.eos_token_id)
print(tok.decode(out[0]))

Pinned revisions and tokenizer check

Revisions.

• Quick start: load without revision= (the latest revision has the weights, model code, tokenizer and this card).
• Exact reproduction needs immutable revisions for both parts:
  • model: weights revision a5bb6bcdab3642acbb203c2b6b6c272669da3693, the revision the evaluations in this card used;
  • tokenizer: that revision has no tokenizer files. They were added in a later commit that did not change the weights, config.json or the model code. Load the tokenizer from that commit, dc11aab4e06fd2000313c8821557a86e8368bf58, and check the files against these SHA-256 values: merges.txt 1ce1664773c50f3e0cc8842619a93edc4624525b728b188a9e0be33b7726adc5; special_tokens_map.json 259f2e7dd02184bad76951125cc8b79cd2f3a8c44ca7dc66737742e5e4f8ed9b; tokenizer.json 8414cab924d8b9b33013f0d221c5862f365ee9be39c5c2bfae8a5a9e970478a6; tokenizer_config.json 7e1ab4968c5c4e97959fb1f6fe5bd979cece96d1a99ac1f15e50c95116585a23; vocab.json 196139668be63f3b5d6574427317ae82f612a97c5d1cdaf36ed2256dbf636783.
• Example: AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(repo, revision="a5bb6bcdab3642acbb203c2b6b6c272669da3693", trust_remote_code=True, torch_dtype=torch.float32) and AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo, revision="dc11aab4e06fd2000313c8821557a86e8368bf58").

Tested (CPU, tokenizer only, transformers 4.46.3): the bundled tokenizer encodes and decodes token-for-token identically to tiktoken gpt2, and adds no BOS/EOS.

from transformers import AutoTokenizer
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("harims95/hobbylm-1B")
assert tok.encode("Hello") == [15496]

Instruct model

The instruction-tuned model has its own repository and card: HobbyLM-1B Instruct.

import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

repo, rev = "harims95/hobbylm-1B-instruct", "0506eed260c353a259712705fa2eb11662f1f0ac"
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo, revision=rev)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(repo, revision=rev, trust_remote_code=True, torch_dtype=torch.float32)
text = tok.apply_chat_template([{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?"}], tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
ids = tok(text, return_tensors="pt")
out = model.generate(**ids, max_new_tokens=64, do_sample=False, pad_token_id=50256)
print(tok.decode(out[0][ids["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))   # The capital of France is Paris.

GGUF with the patched llama.cpp

The GGUF files need the patched runtime from the v1.0.0 release; stock llama.cpp and stock Ollama cannot load them.

huggingface-cli download harims95/hobbylm-1B-gguf hobbylm-1b-sft-3450-Q4_K_M.gguf --revision f8bc034403026b2706f5275702d3801753b87c34 --local-dir .
start-chat-server.bat "C:\path\to\hobbylm-1b-sft-3450-Q4_K_M.gguf"

Then open http://127.0.0.1:8080/ in your browser. The base model runs with run-base-completion.bat. Ollama steps, checksums and test results: the GGUF model card.

Older download commands: commands that pin harims95/hobbylm-1b-hf (the former name of this repository, which redirects here) at revision dc11aab4e06fd2000313c8821557a86e8368bf58 keep working, because that revision still contains the GGUF files.

Windows chat app

Download HobbyLM-1B-Chat-Windows-x64-1.0.0.zip from the release page, extract it, and double-click Start HobbyLM.bat. The chat opens in your browser and runs offline on your computer.

About the Windows packages

All three packages are unofficial builds for Windows x86-64, CPU only. They are not produced, reviewed or endorsed by the llama.cpp/ggml or Ollama projects, and their rebuilt binaries are not code-signed.

Package	What it is	Tested
HobbyLM-1B Chat for Windows (double-click bundle)	A ZIP containing Start HobbyLM.bat, the Instruct Q4_K_M GGUF and the standalone llama.cpp runtime below. It chats in the browser on 127.0.0.1 only.	Extract, launch, chat, close and relaunch; the same-folder launch guard.
Standalone patched llama.cpp runtime	llama.cpp 63bef272 plus 2 HobbyLM patches: the QKV-shape fix and a Windows exit fix. Includes llama-server with a web UI built from source, llama-completion and launchers. No model included.	Recorded outputs reproduced from a clean PATH; offline; web UI checked in a browser.
Patched Ollama runtime	The official ollama.exe v0.35.1, unchanged, plus a runtime rebuilt from Ollama's llama.cpp (b11232) with 2 HobbyLM patches. Uses an isolated address (127.0.0.1:11435) and data folder. No model included.	Recorded outputs reproduced through the raw and chat APIs.

• Stock runtimes: stock Ollama v0.35.1 was tested and fails to load the model (attn_qkv.weight shape mismatch). Unpatched llama.cpp was not run; its code expects the same QKV shape that Ollama rejects.
• Test coverage: everything above ran on one machine: Windows 11, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, CPU backend, AVX2 ("haswell") code path.
• Not tested: the other x86-64 CPU variants included in the packages, Windows on ARM, Linux, macOS, and any GPU backend (CUDA, Vulkan, Metal).
• Downloads: HobbyLM 1.0.0 release on GitHub: the double-click chat bundle, the patched llama.cpp and Ollama runtimes, and their source archive.

Limitations and Disclaimer

• Intended use: research on small sparse MoE models, pretraining and fine-tuning experiments. Not for: production use or as a factual reference.
• No safety tuning or preference tuning. Outputs can be wrong, biased or harmful.
• Context: the base model was trained at 1024 tokens. The instruction-tuned model is configured for 4096 tokens, but its 4K parent failed a 4K retrieval certification, so long-context recall is not demonstrated.
• Precision: The FP32 Transformers models (the root files of this repository, hobbylm-1B-instruct and the checkpoints in hobbylm-1b-checkpoints) must stay fp32. Converting the router to bf16 changes which experts are selected: router top-1 agreement drops to 62%, and full-model output agreement drops from 97.6% to 61%. With top-8-of-64 routing, the score gap between rank 8 and rank 9 is below bf16's precision, so lowering the router's precision silently changes behavior. GGUF conversions (hobbylm-1B-gguf) are separate files: three formats of the instruct model (F32, Q8_0, Q4_K_M) and a separate base-model F32 file. The quantised GGUFs retain the router and expert-bias tensors in F32. Output agreement, token-identical to the FP32 Transformers reference on seven fixed prompts: Instruct F32 6/7; Instruct Q8_0 7/7; Instruct Q4_K_M 6/7. Perplexity change relative to the Instruct F32 GGUF, measured on the model's own evaluation prompts and outputs (so it shows relative quantisation loss only): +0.02% (Q8_0) and +1.1% (Q4_K_M). No lm-eval benchmarks were run on the GGUF versions, and these checks do not establish general quality parity. Details: the GGUF model card.
• Tokenizer: GPT-2 BPE, English-centric and less token-efficient.
• Runtimes: vLLM and SGLang have not been validated. GGUF runs only with the supplied patched runtimes (see the compatibility note under Model List), and only the checks listed on the GGUF model card were run.

License

Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE). Attributions are in NOTICE.

Artifact	Licence
Model weights: the base model.safetensors in this repo, and the GGUF files in hobbylm-1B-gguf	Apache-2.0
Model code in this repo (configuration_hobbylm.py, modeling_hobbylm.py): a Hugging Face port of the HobbyLM architecture and original model code by Harish (github.com/harishsg993010/HobbyLM)	Apache-2.0, released with its author's permission
Tokenizer vocabulary files (vocab.json, merges.txt, tokenizer.json): GPT-2 BPE from openai-community/gpt2	MIT (OpenAI), unchanged
Training data	each source's own terms (see NOTICE and below)
Runtime software (e.g. llama.cpp, Ollama) used to run the GGUF files	its own licences; not covered by this licence

Training-data licence notes

Apache-2.0 is the authors' licence for the weights. It does not change the terms of the training data, and it does not resolve this open question, disclosed here:

• codeparrot-clean (10% of pretraining) declares no dataset licence; each file carries its original repository's licence. No licence filter was applied, so copyleft-licensed files may be included.

Other pretraining sources (FineWeb-Edu, FineMath, Cosmopedia v2: ODC-By 1.0; DCLM-baseline: CC BY 4.0) are attributed in NOTICE.

Credits

Built by Hariharan and Prabhurajhan at Fuel Labs. Architecture based on HobbyLM by Harish.