binary-trit-coder / README.md
issdandavis's picture
docs: mark superseded and point at the canonical repo
3bee9e2 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
1.75 kB
---
license: mit
tags:
- from-scratch
- opcode
- ternary
- trit
- execution-verified
- tiny
- superseded
---
<!-- scbe-status -->
> **Status: superseded.** Canonical coding model: [scbe-coding-agent-vtc-qwen15-v1-gguf](https://hf.co/issdandavis/scbe-coding-agent-vtc-qwen15-v1-gguf). Kept as research history.
# Binary-Trit Coder (Clay's opcode model)
A **from-scratch, 3.17M-param causal transformer** trained from *random init* on Issac's own opcode
substrate β€” a bijective ternary ("trit") op grammar: `join (+)`, `take (βˆ’)`, `weave (Γ—)` over digit leaves,
prefix-notation, depth-2. No pretraining, no outside corpus.
## Honest benchmark β€” its OWN domain, not Python
The metric is **execution-verify rate**: sample a program, *run it for real*, check the model's answer.
| Test | Score |
|---|---|
| in-distribution (depth-2, fresh) | **98.6%** |
| OOD generalization (depth-3, never trained) | 47.0% |
**This is NOT a Python code-gen model.** It has an 18-token opcode vocab; it will score ~0 on
LiveCodeBench/SciCode (wrong domain). Its "learn from doing" signal is the verify-rate above.
## The chrysalis (capability layers, all execution-verified)
- variables/let-bindings (69.5% end-to-end; 100% with a calculator + show-work)
- ping-pong Ο†-lattice solver β€” recovers a hidden intermediate 100%
- calc-offload, dark-space inference, combustion candidate-spark
## Files
`scratch_coder.pt` (weights + vocab), `config.json`. Architecture + inference in
[github.com/issdandavis/loom](https://github.com/issdandavis/loom) `scratch_coder.py`.
*Thesis: coding is finite + bijective + execution-verifiable, so a small model from random init can MASTER
the mapping β€” proven here at 98.6%.*