Instructions to use paulsaurav/resnet50-inference-optimization with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- TensorRT
How to use paulsaurav/resnet50-inference-optimization with TensorRT:
# No code snippets available yet for this library. # To use this model, check the repository files and the library's documentation. # Want to help? PRs adding snippets are welcome at: # https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface.js
- Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
ResNet-50 (ONNX) β inference-optimization benchmark
This is a standard torchvision ResNet-50 (IMAGENET1K_V2 weights) exported to
ONNX, published as the portable artifact from an inference-optimization study.
The point of the repo is not the weights β they're the stock torchvision model β
but the benchmark: what FP16, ONNX Runtime, and TensorRT (FP16 / INT8) do to
latency and accuracy on the same hardware, measured the same way.
The .onnx file lets you reproduce the ONNX Runtime and TensorRT results, or
build your own engine, without re-exporting.
Benchmark summary
NVIDIA GPU, CUDA 12.1, TensorRT 10.13. 200 timed iterations, 20 warm-up
discarded, torch.cuda.synchronize() around each timed region. Accuracy on a
fixed 3,200-image ImageNet-val slice, identical across variants.
Batch-1 latency (single-request):
| Variant | p50 (ms) | Speedup vs FP32 | Top-1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyTorch FP32 | 6.87 | 1.0x | 85.25% |
| PyTorch FP16 | 7.92 | 0.87x | 85.25% |
| ONNX Runtime | 2.67 | 2.6x | β |
| TensorRT FP16 | 0.74 | 9.3x | 85.25% |
| TensorRT INT8 | 0.59 | 11.6x | 84.97% |
Batch-32 throughput:
| Variant | Throughput (img/s) | vs FP32 |
|---|---|---|
| PyTorch FP32 | 1068 | 1.0x |
| PyTorch FP16 | 2091 | 2.0x |
| ONNX Runtime | 975 | 0.9x |
| TensorRT FP16 | 5118 | 4.8x |
| TensorRT INT8 | 10021 | 9.4x |
Headline: TensorRT INT8 is 11.6x faster than FP32 at batch 1 for a 0.28-point top-1 drop.
The accuracy figures are higher than the canonical ~80.3% because they're on an easier 3,200-image slice; the relative gap between variants is the point, and it's valid because every variant saw the same images.
Intended use
Reference artifact for inference-optimization work: a fixed ResNet-50 ONNX graph you can run in ONNX Runtime or compile with TensorRT to reproduce or extend the numbers above. Not a new or improved model β the weights are stock torchvision.
How to use
ONNX Runtime (CUDA):
import onnxruntime as ort
import numpy as np
sess = ort.InferenceSession("resnet50.onnx", providers=["CUDAExecutionProvider"])
x = np.random.randn(1, 3, 224, 224).astype(np.float32) # NCHW, ImageNet-normalized
out = sess.run(None, {sess.get_inputs()[0].name: x})[0]
pred = out.argmax(1)
Preprocessing is standard ImageNet eval: resize 256, center-crop 224, normalize
with mean [0.485, 0.456, 0.406] and std [0.229, 0.224, 0.225], in NCHW order.
The input has a dynamic batch axis, so any batch size works.
Model details
- Architecture: ResNet-50
- Weights: torchvision
ResNet50_Weights.IMAGENET1K_V2 - Input:
(batch, 3, 224, 224)float32, ImageNet-normalized, NCHW - Output:
(batch, 1000)logits over ImageNet-1k classes - ONNX opset: 17
Limitations
Batch-1 p95 latency is noisy at sub-millisecond scale and shouldn't be read as a tail-latency guarantee. Absolute accuracy is on a subset, not the full 50k val set. INT8 numbers come from TensorRT 10.x implicit calibration (deprecated in 11.x, which uses explicit QDQ via NVIDIA ModelOpt).
Full code, benchmark scripts, and methodology: github.com/paulsaurav/resnet50-inference-optimization.