size 35.53 GB top-1 agreement with BF16 97.9% 225 tok/s at concurrency 32 KV pool 262,448 tokens tested on one RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell primitive.com

8-bit weights and activations: 97.9% top-1 agreement with BF16 at 54% of its size, on one card.

FP8 build of Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B at 35.53 GB, against 66.24 GB for the BF16 release.
Every linear layer in the 52 decoder blocks stores FP8 E4M3 weights with one scale per output channel; activations are quantized to FP8 per token at runtime. Embeddings, the LM head and the norms stay BF16.

Drift is the extra negative log-likelihood per token a build assigns to 400 reasoning traces that BF16 wrote on the same card; top-1 agreement is how often its most likely next token is BF16's. The pass is deterministic.


Why this build

  • 🎯 Drift +5.95×10⁻³ nats per token from BF16, top-1 agreement 97.9%. The NVFP4 build sits at +64.3 and 93.7%.
  • 📏 Knowledge 89.3, tool calls 80.4, abstain 63.3; BF16 scores 89.7, 80.8 and 63.3. 99.1% of answers finish inside the budget.
  • ⚡ 35.4 tok/s single-stream and 225 at concurrency 32 on one card, against 20.1 and 129 for BF16 on the same card.
  • 🗜️ 35.53 GB, against 66.24 GB in BF16. At a 32,768-token window the KV pool is 262,448 tokens, against 113,648 for BF16.

Serve it

hf download primitive-ai/Nanbeige4.3-33B-FP8 --local-dir ./Nanbeige4.3-33B-FP8

docker run --gpus '"device=0"' --ipc=host -p 8000:8000 -v $PWD:/models \
  vllm/vllm-openai:v0.32.0 \
  --model /models/Nanbeige4.3-33B-FP8 \
  --max-model-len 131072 --gpu-memory-utilization 0.92 \
  --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder

Checked with exactly this command on an idle card: boot 171 s, 33.44 GiB of weights, a 251,504-token KV pool at the 131,072-token window. What is 17*23? comes back as 391 with the reasoning split off by the parser, and as 391 with chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}; a weather question comes back as the parsed call get_weather {"city": "Lisbon"}. The model's window is 524,288 tokens; raise --max-model-len as far as the KV pool allows.


Measured

One RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, 96 GB, no tensor parallelism, vLLM 0.32.0, BF16 KV cache. The 1,170-item knowledge suite and the 200-item tool-calling suite, temperature 0.6 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 20, thinking on, a 16,384-token budget, concurrency 32, auto-scored with no LLM judge. Throughput is 8K in / 512 out, prefix-cache free, two seeds per cell. KV pool is at a 32,768-token window and --gpu-memory-utilization 0.92.

build format size drift (×10⁻³ nats/token) top-1 agreement knowledge call abstain finished tok/s @1 tok/s @32 KV pool (tokens)
Nanbeige4.3-33B (BF16 release) BF16 66.24 GB 0 (reference) 100% 89.7 80.8 63.3 99.2% 20.1 129 113,648
this repo FP8 W8A8, every Linear 35.53 GB +5.95 97.9% 89.3 80.4 63.3 99.1% 35.4 225 262,448
Mixed NVFP4 / FP8 NVFP4 W4A4, FP8 W8A8 in 216 modules 25.30 GB +38.89 95.1% 88.9 79.0 63.3 99.1% 48.0 308 311,488
NVFP4 NVFP4 W4A4, every Linear 22.07 GB +64.28 93.7% 89.0 78.8 64.2 99.1% 53.8 336 326,144

Drift and agreement come from 400 BF16 traces of the knowledge suite (215,950 completion tokens); the standard error over traces is 0.3 for this build. Tool calling is 3 runs per build; knowledge is 2 runs per quantized build and 1 for BF16.

What this table does not cover:

  • Context past 32K. The model's window is 524,288 tokens; we did not measure the quantized layers there.
  • Other GPUs. Only the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (sm_120) was tested.

Comparable with our other models

Accuracy numbers move for reasons that have nothing to do with the model: a shorter token budget, a different temperature, or whether the model was allowed to reason at all. So every number in this table, on this card and on our other cards, comes from the one fixed protocol described above, the same 1,370 items, auto-scored, no LLM judge.

model shape size overall knowledge call abstain finished out/answer
Laguna-XS-2.1 31 B MoE 19.3 GiB 81.7 83.8 68.4 73.5 98.9% 1097
Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B 30 B MoE+Mamba 19.2 GiB 87.1 87.9 85.4 70.5 97.9% 1429
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B 35 B MoE 22.6 GiB 88.7 91.7 74.4 60.0 99.3% 760
Muse-Glimmer-30B 30 B MoE 20.4 GiB 86.6 88.8 78.6 54.5 99.7% 800
Qwen3.8-27B 27 B dense 20.7 GiB 88.8 90.4 85.5 54.5 99.7% 651
Granite-4.2-30B 30 B dense 18.1 GB 85.5 86.2 85.8 60.8 98.5% 1502
Nex-N2.5-mini NVFP4 35 B MoE, 3 B active 23.91 GB 88.5 90.5 81.9 57.5 99.3% 524
Nex-N2.5-mini mixed 35 B MoE, 3 B active 26.04 GB 88.5 90.6 80.9 58.7 99.2% 504
Nex-N2.5-mini FP8 35 B MoE, 3 B active 38.13 GB 88.7 90.9 79.4 60.0 99.5% 545
K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B NVFP4 37 B MoE+MoVA, 4 B active 36.7 GB 84.1 86.5 71.8 60.4 95.6% 1234
K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B mixed 37 B MoE+MoVA, 4 B active 44.5 GB 84.9 87.3 73.5 58.9 96.3% 1118
Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B mixed 75 B MoE+Mamba, 9 B active 46.70 GB 89.3 90.6 87.9 58.3 98.5% 1173
Laguna-S-2.1 110 B MoE 64.0 GiB 84.3 87.1 64.6 81.0 97.3% 995
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 180 B MoE, 6 B active 183.7 GB 90.3 92.2 84.8 56.7 99.5% 686
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL NVFP4 309 B MoE, 15 B active 182.40 GB 89.3 91.1 83.0 61.0 99.0% 664
Kolibri-1 FP8 78 B MoE, 3.5 B active 78.83 GB 85.0 86.1 86.1 48.0 97.0% 1824
Kolibri-1 NVFP4 78 B MoE, 3.5 B active 47.70 GB 84.9 86.2 84.9 48.0 96.4% 1947
Kolibri-1 mixed 78 B MoE, 3.5 B active 45.81 GB 83.9 85.0 85.5 47.5 96.6% 1848
LFM2.5-24B-A2B NVFP4A16 24 B MoE, 2.45 B active 14.95 GB 83.9 85.4 82.4 44.5 98.8% 1603
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (release, 4 cards) 427 B MoE, 23 B active 250.12 GB 82.9 85.0 81.7 25.0 99.2% 513
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-pruned-272B 272 B MoE, 23 B active 162.90 GB 82.5 84.4 80.4 32.5 98.8% 707
Nanbeige4.3-33B (BF16 release) 33 B dense 66.24 GB 87.9 89.7 80.8 63.3 99.2% 846
Nanbeige4.3-33B FP8 (this repo) 33 B dense 35.53 GB 87.5 89.3 80.4 63.3 99.1% 871
Nanbeige4.3-33B mixed 33 B dense 25.30 GB 87.0 88.9 79.0 63.3 99.1% 905
Nanbeige4.3-33B NVFP4 33 B dense 22.07 GB 87.1 89.0 78.8 64.2 99.1% 940

overall pools the two suites as 1,370 items, weighted 85.4% knowledge and 14.6% tool calling by item count. Read it with finished: overall scores an answer that overran the token budget as wrong, and cannot say whether the model needed the room or failed to stop. A gap under 1.0 in overall is a tie. Sizes are as each card reports them, which mixes GB and GiB.


What's in it

Nanbeige4.3-33B is a dense Llama-architecture model: 33.12 B parameters, 52 layers, hidden size 7168, 56 query and 8 KV heads, MLP width 22,016.

params share
MLP gate + up + down, 52 layers 24.62 B 74.3%
attention q + k + v, 52 layers 3.44 B 10.4%
attention o, 52 layers 2.67 B 8.1%
embeddings and LM head (untied) 2.39 B 7.2%
modules count format
every decoder Linear (q, k, v, o, gate, up, down) 364 FP8 E4M3, one scale per output channel; activations FP8, one scale per token
embeddings, LM head, norms all BF16, byte-identical to the release

The checkpoint is compressed-tensors and runs on vLLM's stock kernels. q/k/v and gate/up share one format per layer because vLLM fuses them.


Licence

Apache-2.0, the base model's licence. This is a modified version of Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B: the decoder's linear layers were quantized and config.json carries a quantization_config. Everything else is unchanged.



Primitive
primitive · more models · inference economics for production LLM systems

Downloads last month
499
Safetensors
Model size
33B params
Tensor type
F8_E4M3
·
BF16
·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for primitive-ai/Nanbeige4.3-33B-FP8

Quantized
(99)
this model
Quantizations
1 model