|
Download knowledge-base/class_11/ch4/0084_algebra.md from False45/math-api: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 1.53 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/spaces/False45/math-api/resolve/main/knowledge-base/class_11/ch4/0084_algebra.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://spaces/False45/math-api/knowledge-base/class_11/ch4/0084_algebra.md
-
curl -L -o 0084_algebra.md https://huggingface.co/spaces/False45/math-api/resolve/main/knowledge-base/class_11/ch4/0084_algebra.md
1.53 kB
| source: ncert | |
| topic: algebra | |
| class_level: class_11 | |
| chapter: ch4 | |
| difficulty: intermediate | |
| Class 11 | Ch4: Principle of Mathematical Induction | |
| PMI METHOD: | |
| Step 1 (Base case): Verify statement P(n) is true for n=1 (or starting value). | |
| Step 2 (Inductive step): Assume P(k) is true. Prove P(k+1) is true. | |
| Conclusion: By PMI, P(n) is true for all n>=1. | |
| KEY: The inductive step uses P(k) (called inductive hypothesis) to prove P(k+1). | |
| STANDARD RESULTS TO PROVE: | |
| Sum of natural numbers: 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2. | |
| Sum of squares: 1^2+2^2+...+n^2=n(n+1)(2n+1)/6. | |
| Sum of cubes: 1^3+2^3+...+n^3=[n(n+1)/2]^2. | |
| Geometric sum: a+ar+ar^2+...+ar^(n-1)=a(r^n-1)/(r-1). | |
| SOLVED EXAMPLES: | |
| Example 1: Prove 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2 by PMI. | |
| Base: n=1. LHS=1. RHS=1(2)/2=1. True. | |
| Assume true for n=k: 1+2+...+k=k(k+1)/2. | |
| Prove for n=k+1: 1+2+...+k+(k+1)=k(k+1)/2+(k+1)=(k+1)(k/2+1)=(k+1)(k+2)/2. | |
| This is (k+1)(k+2)/2 which is the formula for n=k+1. Proved. | |
| Example 2: Prove 2^n>n for all n>=1. | |
| Base: n=1. 2^1=2>1. True. | |
| Assume 2^k>k. Prove 2^(k+1)>k+1. | |
| 2^(k+1)=2×2^k>2k (using hypothesis). 2k=k+k>=k+1 (since k>=1). | |
| So 2^(k+1)>k+1. Proved. | |
| Example 3: Prove 4^n-1 divisible by 3. | |
| Base: 4^1-1=3. Divisible by 3. True. | |
| Assume 4^k-1=3m for some integer m. | |
| 4^(k+1)-1=4×4^k-1=4(3m+1)-1=12m+4-1=12m+3=3(4m+1). Divisible by 3. Proved. | |
| COMMON MISTAKES: | |
| BOTH steps are necessary. Proving only base case is not enough. | |
| In inductive step: assume P(k), then DERIVE P(k+1) (not assume P(k+1)). | |
| The technique works by domino effect: if each domino knocks next, all fall. |