|
Download PRODUCT.md from devadit15/rubriq: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.89 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/spaces/devadit15/rubriq/resolve/main/PRODUCT.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://spaces/devadit15/rubriq/PRODUCT.md
-
curl -L -o PRODUCT.md https://huggingface.co/spaces/devadit15/rubriq/resolve/main/PRODUCT.md
2.89 kB
| # Product | |
| ## Register | |
| product | |
| ## Users | |
| Developers, prompt engineers, and analysts who just got a disappointing LLM | |
| output and want to know what exactly went wrong and how to fix the prompt. | |
| They arrive mid-task with two blobs of text on the clipboard. Secondary but | |
| critical user: Devadit demoing to his EXL mentor on a projector for ten | |
| minutes — the interface must read from across a room and never require | |
| explanation. | |
| ## Product Purpose | |
| Rubriq scores a pasted prompt/output pair against evaluation parameters from | |
| published research, quotes the evidence for every finding, and generates | |
| paste-ready repair prompts adapted to the model that produced the output. | |
| Everything runs locally — the honesty about what local scoring can and | |
| cannot judge is a core feature, not fine print. Success: a user pastes a | |
| pair, understands the verdict profile in seconds, and leaves with a repair | |
| prompt on their clipboard. | |
| ## Brand Personality | |
| Forensic, precise, calm. A pathology report, not a dashboard: verdicts in | |
| green ink on white paper, evidence under glass. The interface asserts what | |
| it can prove, flags what it cannot, and never decorates. Quoted text is | |
| sacred — always verbatim, always visually distinct. | |
| ## Anti-references | |
| - SaaS-cream analytics dashboards: hero metrics, gradient accents, KPI tiles. | |
| - Hacker/terminal aesthetics: all-mono, neon-on-black. (Considered and | |
| rejected by the owner — too costume-y for a tool claiming rigor.) | |
| - AI-chat products: bubbles, sparkle icons, "magic" language. Rubriq is the | |
| skeptic that checks AI, so it must not look like AI marketing. | |
| - Grading-app gamification: confetti, letter grades, celebratory motion. | |
| ## Design Principles | |
| 1. **The profile is the star, never the average.** Per-parameter verdicts | |
| lead; the overall score is a small summary, not a hero number (HELM's | |
| reporting philosophy, which the engine itself follows). | |
| 2. **Every claim shows its receipt.** Findings quote the output; parameters | |
| cite their research source; repair prompts name the diagnosed failure. | |
| If the UI states something, the evidence is one glance away. | |
| 3. **Honesty is a first-class surface.** Proxy badges, judge-mode carve-outs, | |
| and skipped checks render as designed elements, not disclaimers in gray 7px. | |
| 4. **Disappear into the task.** Paste, evaluate, read, copy. No onboarding | |
| tour, no settings hunt; advanced options fold away until wanted. | |
| 5. **Motion states, never decorates.** Report arrival, score fill, copy | |
| confirmation — feedback only, 150-250ms, reduced-motion respected. | |
| ## Accessibility & Inclusion | |
| WCAG 2.1 AA. Body text ≥4.5:1; score semantics never carried by color alone | |
| (icons + labels accompany pass/warn/fail). Full keyboard operability for the | |
| evaluate flow and copy actions. `prefers-reduced-motion` honored everywhere. | |
| Projector legibility: minimum 14px effective text in the report pane. | |