zils-lite-body-10: class-balanced human-label fine-tune of the current Zils LITE soup
A decision body for the Zils d3-lite soup pool (Bittensor subnet 127), Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B family. It is a fine-tune of
qhoenix/zils-lite-decision-v9 @083d5b9aa3d2db48155cd6e7f92ac6f9aa057c65
(Apache-2.0; Zils body digest 8b8e3db3c8a62cbde4b5fb034bffb2c871faa1db450f6ddb0103ad120a44cfe5), which is the current d3-lite soup, as
Zils's mining guide allows ("You may fine-tune the current soup"). Credit for the starting weights belongs to its author and the works it
was built on (see NOTICE). No other miner's body was merged; it is not a re-upload of any public model.
Method
- Training: LoRA rank 32 / alpha 64 / dropout 0.05 on the attention and Gated-DeltaNet projections of every language layer (no MLP), merged into the weights after training (trainer train_soft_c_gold_v3.py bc191000). Learning rate 2e-5, AdamW with weight decay 1.0 on the LoRA weights, batch 8 x accumulation 2, warm-up 50 steps then cosine, 2 epochs, max 2,048 tokens, seed 4343; loss per row = cross-entropy on the row's gold label + 1.0 x Brier over its options. No KL term to the start, no teacher or reference outputs.
- This body: the save at 75% of training (1.5 of the 2 epochs) of the LoRA fine-tune, merged into the weights (no weight averaging).
Training data (4,262 rows, file sha256 90d702689f46e427d0ede0ef5a71be93186c631a1da1db3c0b56729f0c9fd39a)
A class-balanced set in the exam's 15 "known" families (5 categories x choice / yes-no / score; category shares follow the published exam weights where a cell had enough rows). Every label is the dataset's own label (human annotators, or the dataset's own prover / generator), derived by code from the dataset record, or computed by our own generator; no label was predicted by a model we ran, and no other miner's outputs were used. Version 3 of our class-balanced LITE set (band difficulty rule below; freeze tool balL_freeze.py v1.8 33a629d3). Difficulty rule per cell (to avoid the label-noise tail of a pure hardest-first pick): rows with a human label were taken in a fixed hash order from those on which the starting body (decision-v9) puts probability 0.30-0.90 on the correct answer (rows at or above 0.90 only to fill a short cell, the hardest of them first); code-labelled and proven rows hardest-first; 50% cap per source except where noted in the freeze receipt.
| category | choice | yes/no | score | total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reasoning | 431 | 646 | 431 | 1508 |
| language | 430 | 428 | 473 | 1331 |
| retrieval | 334 | 332 | 0 | 666 |
| tools | 175 | 0 | 0 | 175 |
| arts | 166 | 166 | 250 | 582 |
| source | rows | label | original licence | original release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIQA (TRAIN split) | 646 | human gold label: the shown method is the correct or the wrong solution of the goal | AFL-3.0 | https://yonatanbisk.com/piqa/ |
| MultiNLI (GLUE, TRAIN split) | 430 | human gold label (3-way; in yes/no rows entailment = yes, neutral / contradiction = no) | OANC licence; fiction parts CC BY-SA 3.0 / CC BY 3.0 | https://cims.nyu.edu/~sbowman/multinli/ |
| Social IQa (TRAIN split) | 378 | human gold answer | CC BY 4.0 | https://allenai.org/data/socialiqa |
| 20 Newsgroups (SetFit mirror, TRAIN split) | 334 | the newsgroup the post was sent to | no open licence is named by the original release; used under the original authors' terms | http://qwone.com/~jason/20Newsgroups/ |
| STS Benchmark (TRAIN split, captions genre) | 323 | human 0-5 similarity mean mapped to the nearest of 5 levels; rows near a level edge dropped | no open licence is named by the original release; used under the original authors' terms (mixed sources; the mirror card says 'unknown') | https://huggingface.co/datasets/mteb/stsbenchmark-sts |
| SST-5 (Stanford Sentiment Treebank, TRAIN split) | 250 | human 5-class sentiment label | no open licence is named by the original release; used under the original authors' terms | https://nlp.stanford.edu/sentiment/ |
| SNLI (TRAIN split) | 215 | human gold label | CC BY-SA 4.0 | https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/snli/ |
| RTE (GLUE, TRAIN split) | 213 | human gold label (entailment / not entailment) | no open licence is named by the original release; used under the original authors' terms (PASCAL RTE challenges) | https://gluebenchmark.com/ |
| QNLI (GLUE, TRAIN split; text from SQuAD v1.1) | 167 | human gold label (the sentence answers the question) | CC BY-SA 4.0 (SQuAD) | https://rajpurkar.github.io/SQuAD-explorer/ |
| iSarcasmEval task A (TRAIN split) | 166 | the tweet author's own sarcasm label | MIT | https://github.com/iabufarha/iSarcasmEval |
| SQuAD 2.0 (TRAIN split, sentence level) | 165 | derived by code from the human answer spans (the sentence holds the answer or not) | CC BY-SA 4.0 | https://rajpurkar.github.io/SQuAD-explorer/ |
| ToolACE @6bda777c | 100 | read off the record: the real call is the answer; distractors break a required argument (code-checked) | Apache-2.0 | https://huggingface.co/datasets/Team-ACE/ToolACE |
| GoEmotions (simplified, TRAIN split) | 83 | human label (rows with exactly one of the 6 emotion names) | Apache-2.0 (google-research repository) | https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/goemotions |
| TweetEval emotion (SemEval-2018 Task 1, TRAIN split) | 83 | human emotion label | no open licence is named by the original release; used under the original authors' terms (TweetEval: 'restrictions may apply to individual tasks'; Twitter terms) | https://github.com/cardiffnlp/tweeteval |
| Hermes function-calling v1 @dae3e1d2 (func-calling file; the authors' Glaive-derived glaive-function-calling-5k file excluded) | 75 | read off the record: the real call is the answer; distractors break a required argument (code-checked) | Apache-2.0 | https://huggingface.co/datasets/NousResearch/hermes-function-calling-v1 |
| RuleTaker (tasksource mirror) | 53 | the dataset's prover label under the stated closed-world assumption | Apache-2.0 (allenai/ruletaker repository) | https://github.com/allenai/ruletaker |
| our code generator: reasoning score items (ASDiv-style word problems) | 431 | computed by the generator from its item spec and re-counted independently | our own code | - |
| our code generator: language score items | 150 | computed by the generator from its item spec and re-counted independently | our own code | - |
Licence note. 1,203 of the 4,262 rows come from 5 datasets whose original release names no open licence (20 Newsgroups (SetFit mirror, TRAIN split), STS Benchmark (TRAIN split, captions genre), SST-5 (Stanford Sentiment Treebank, TRAIN split), RTE (GLUE, TRAIN split), TweetEval emotion (SemEval-2018 Task 1, TRAIN split)). We used their TRAIN splits for training only, under the original authors' terms; this repository contains model weights only, no dataset text. Check those datasets' terms before you reuse this body for anything they may restrict.
Filters on every row: no exam split files (the validation / test splits the Zils exam-authoring code reads were never opened), no Glaive data, no BIG-bench / MMLU, no real-event rows; our exam-split 8-gram guard and test-overlap rule (both directions) removed every hit; near-duplicates removed; no rows written by an LLM item writer, no house or relay labels, no other miner's outputs as targets. Share-alike terms (CC BY-SA) apply to redistributing source text; this repository holds model weights only.
Checks we ran before commit (not an official score)
- Change from Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B (Zils relative change): 0.03556 (cap 0.15). Zils body digest fe50bb3aa8a5c8f5ac769c9bb263d9f01290ae0a66a936c704708de37db7f201.
- Copy screen with the official
soup_copiescode (our seeds; the validator's seed is private): own share beyond the house bodies, the listed public models, the soup and the release 0.018-0.019, i.e. below (house-mix line 0.05); largest cosine to any of them or to our other committed bodies 0.991 (with the soup body qhoenix/zils-lite-decision-v9) (line 0.999); largest share explained by earlier bodies 0.004 (line 0.30). - Our own exam-style reads vs the start (same code, same items; not the Zils exam): predicted score +0.15 points overall, within our measurement error (flat); by category reasoning -2.1, language +3.8, retrieval -3.7, tools +3.1, arts +0.2. On the known-family part alone reasoning (-1.77), retrieval (-6.98) and arts (-2.32) fell; the retrieval drop is over-confidence (its accuracy is flat). This 75% save was chosen after the reads; it was not fixed in advance.
Licence
Apache-2.0 (LICENSE). See NOTICE for the upstream works and their notices. Nothing here is legal advice; check the original datasets' terms for your use.
- Downloads last month
- 38
Model tree for tensor-tailor/zils-lite-body-10
Base model
Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base