|
Download README.md from turnercore/needle-automaticity-v10: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.39 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/turnercore/needle-automaticity-v10/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://turnercore/needle-automaticity-v10/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/turnercore/needle-automaticity-v10/resolve/main/README.md
2.39 kB
| library_name: needle-point | |
| license: apache-2.0 | |
| pipeline_tag: text-generation | |
| tags: | |
| - tool-calling | |
| - function-calling | |
| - constrained-decoding | |
| - automaticity | |
| # Needle Automaticity V10 | |
| Needle Automaticity V10 is a compact bounded tool-calling model for the Needle | |
| Point runtime. It is intended for fast sensing, finite one-off actions, and | |
| simple expression—not open-ended planning or unconstrained tool arguments. | |
| The model uses 36 allowed capabilities with closed enum, const, boolean, and | |
| finite-array argument domains. Open-ended capabilities are excluded. | |
| ## Training | |
| The checkpoint was trained with upstream JAX Needle pinned to commit | |
| `ffb1c5144c5a16cb8ec650dbc8a6f6fd3854f8f2` and converted for Needle Point. | |
| Training used a 1,767-row JEV-assisted corpus. JEV was used to audit labels and | |
| identify hard examples for additional exposure; teacher responses were not | |
| copied into the training labels. All action disagreements were manually | |
| reviewed and canonical gold labels were retained. | |
| ## Held-out evaluation | |
| Acceptance was run through Needle Point strict constrained decoding on a | |
| family-isolated 360-case benchmark: | |
| | Lane | Exact match | | |
| |---|---:| | |
| | Action/tool call | 215/216 (99.5370%) | | |
| | Hard no-tool boundary | 144/144 (100%) | | |
| | Combined | 359/360 (99.7222%) | | |
| All outputs parsed and validated, no boundary case overcalled, and no | |
| constraint fallback occurred. | |
| A later 100-case fresh adversarial holdout produced 56% exact match: 53.33% on | |
| 60 action cases and 60% on 40 hard no-tool cases, with 98% valid outputs. This | |
| is the more conservative estimate of robustness to novel adversarial wording; | |
| the 99.72% result is specific to the curated V10 held-out distribution. | |
| The unassisted gold checkpoint scored 58% on the same fresh holdout (36.67% | |
| action, 90% no-tool), showing that assisted hard-example weighting traded | |
| higher action recall for substantially lower boundary precision. | |
| ## Files and integrity | |
| - `model.safetensors`: | |
| `7bf8417fb2dc6ff03f33549e959e6aa4dd06898ab4a3d7d160f63bee1e4693af` | |
| - `config.json`: | |
| `bb90a73f354403511e0c83df8a5962e04752be831af386074080423aec34695e` | |
| - `tokenizer.model`: | |
| `0823f5b9133c68a8140addc5d7a425fa9119c4c8cb4a550363b4bffa4ba1c8c7` | |
| Use the strict Needle Point runtime and provide a finite candidate-tool set for | |
| each request. The model is not intended to authorize tools or bypass runtime | |
| policy checks. | |