|
Download docs/HANDOFF_H200_32K.md from unparallelled/BluScriptCP: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 7.53 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/unparallelled/BluScriptCP/resolve/main/docs/HANDOFF_H200_32K.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://unparallelled/BluScriptCP/docs/HANDOFF_H200_32K.md
-
curl -L -o HANDOFF_H200_32K.md https://huggingface.co/unparallelled/BluScriptCP/resolve/main/docs/HANDOFF_H200_32K.md
7.53 kB
| # Handoff: 16k -> 32k YaRN extension on the 2x H200 | |
| Written 2026-09-09 from the 2x H100 box. Everything below is measured on this | |
| box unless marked as a projection. | |
| ## What the 2x H200 CAN and CANNOT do | |
| `cp` cannot exceed the GPU count, so on 2 GPUs `tokens/rank = T/2`. | |
| | target | tok/rank | total/GPU | 2x H200 (143 GB) | | |
| |---|---|---|---| | |
| | 16k | 8,192 | 70.7 GB (measured) | comfortable | | |
| | **32k** | 16,384 | **130.8 GB (projected)** | **91.4% -- tight, probe first** | | |
| | 64k | 32,768 | 250.9 GB | 175% -- impossible | | |
| - **32k: run it.** `ext_32k.sh` starts with a 3-step probe and aborts on OOM. | |
| - **64k: needs 4+ GPUs.** 4x H200 at cp=4 = 127.6 GB/GPU fits. Nothing to tune | |
| on 2 GPUs: `CP_B` is already 1, and there is no activation-recompute flag in | |
| bluscriptCP.cpp (checked: no `CP_RECOMPUTE`, no gradient checkpointing). | |
| - 64k **evaluation** is fine on 2 GPUs -- generation stores no activations for | |
| backward, so the training memory figure does not apply. | |
| Measured activation cost is 7.51 MB/token/rank. A first-principles estimate for | |
| this architecture is 1.3-2.5 MB, so actual is 3-6x higher than it needs to be | |
| (the config keeps fp32 norms/residual/logits across 36 layers). If that gap is | |
| real, a memory pass could make 32k comfortable and 64k possible on 2 GPUs -- but | |
| that is a C++ change, not a flag, and it is unprofiled. | |
| ## Setup on the new box (nothing is pre-installed) | |
| ```bash | |
| cd /root/Adhi/BluTrain/dist/Context_Parallelism | |
| # 1. build -- BOTH targets, libtensor first | |
| make libtensor SM_ARCH=90 -j$(nproc) | |
| make CP_FUSED_ROPE=1 CP_ATTN_SPLIT=1 SM_ARCH=90 bluscript-cp -j$(nproc) | |
| # 2. tiktoken -- longeval_gen.py needs it. WITHOUT IT training runs fine and the | |
| # eval silently produces "no prompts" / "no scores yet". This has bitten twice. | |
| /root/Adhi/BluTrain/envv/bin/pip install tiktoken | |
| # 3. hf auth (the dataset is public now, but the model repo push needs a token) | |
| hf auth login | |
| # 4. parent checkpoint: l2, the best 16k arm. cp=2 needs it on BOTH ranks. | |
| python - <<'PY' | |
| from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download | |
| import shutil, os | |
| p = hf_hub_download("unparallelled/BluScriptCP", | |
| "checkpoints/lenbucket_l2_blumodelcp_run2_step_400.ckpt") | |
| for r in (0, 1): | |
| d = f"checkpoints_bluscriptcp/rank_{r}/lenbucket_l2_blumodelcp_run2_step_400.ckpt" | |
| os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(d), exist_ok=True) | |
| if not os.path.exists(d): | |
| shutil.copyfile(p, d) | |
| PY | |
| # 5. b3 data (4 train shards + val ~ 930 MB) and the b2-val haystack | |
| hf download unparallelled/BluScriptCP-data --repo-type dataset \ | |
| --include "cp_data_by_length/b3_16384_32768/train_shard_0000[0-3].bin" \ | |
| --include "cp_data_by_length/b3_16384_32768/val_shard_00000.bin" \ | |
| --include "cp_data_by_length/b2_8192_16384/val_shard_00000.bin" \ | |
| --local-dir ./dl | |
| mkdir -p lendata/b3_16384_32768 lendata/haystack | |
| cp dl/cp_data_by_length/b3_16384_32768/*.bin lendata/b3_16384_32768/ | |
| cp dl/cp_data_by_length/b2_8192_16384/val_shard_00000.bin lendata/haystack/b2val_haystack.bin | |
| # VERIFY -- `hf download` exits 0 and prints a path even when --include matches | |
| # NOTHING. Always ls, never trust the exit code. | |
| ls -la lendata/b3_16384_32768/ lendata/haystack/ | |
| # 6. run it | |
| ./ext_32k.sh | |
| ``` | |
| ## The run | |
| ``` | |
| CP_T=32768 YARN_SCALE=2 YARN_ORIG_MAXPOS=16384 | |
| parent: lenbucket_l2_blumodelcp_run2_step_400.ckpt | |
| data: b3_16384_32768 (docs 16-32k -- these now FIT inside the window) | |
| 750 steps x 1,048,576 = 786 M tokens, matching run7's original 4k->16k extension | |
| ``` | |
| **The YaRN invariant, which cost 27pp when it was wrong:** `YARN_SCALE * | |
| YARN_ORIG_MAXPOS` must equal `CP_T` exactly, and `ORIG_MAXPOS` must be the length | |
| the weights were ACTUALLY trained at. Here 2 * 16384 = 32768. The default at | |
| `YARNOps.cpp:57` is **1024** -- always set it explicitly. `ext_32k.sh` asserts it. | |
| Projected step time ~25-29 s (2x the 16k tokens/rank plus attention's quadratic | |
| term), so **750 steps ~ 5-6.5 h**. Unmeasured; the probe prints the real number. | |
| ## Why this run, in one paragraph | |
| The document-length ladder is finished and it ended in a tie. Holding everything | |
| else fixed at a 16k window: | |
| | arm | training docs | 4096 | 8192 | 16360 | | |
| |---|---|---|---|---| | |
| | armA_c | flux, median 826 | 73.0 | 53.0 | 33.0 | | |
| | l1 | b1 4-8k (fits) | 75.0 | 48.0 | 30.0 | | |
| | l2 | b2 8-16k (fits) | **80.0** | 62.0 | **35.0** | | |
| | l3 | b3 16-32k (TRUNCATED) | 74.0 | **64.0** | **35.0** | | |
| l3 - l2 = -6.0 / +2.0 / +0.0 pp, none resolvable (combined 95% bars +-11.5 to | |
| +-13.1). The haystack (b2-val) is in-distribution for l2 and out-of-distribution | |
| for l3, so the bias runs TOWARD l2 and l3 still only drew level. Conclusion: | |
| **document length helps only while documents fit inside the window.** Hence widen | |
| the window, then feed b3. | |
| ## Gate the result on SHORT context, not perplexity | |
| On 2026-09-02 a mismatched cache IMPROVED 16k (0 -> 14-17%) while COLLAPSING 4k | |
| from 74% to 16%. Perplexity at the new length looked fine. `ext_32k.sh` therefore | |
| evaluates 1024 / 4096 / 16360 / 32744 and **a regression at 1k or 4k is a failure | |
| even if 32k improves.** Compare against l2's row above. | |
| (32744 is not arbitrary: `PROMPT_LEN + MAX_NEW` must pad up to <= `CP_T` with | |
| PAD=256, and 32744 + 24 = 32768 exactly.) | |
| ## Traps already paid for | |
| 1. **Never edit a running bash script.** Bash reads incrementally from a byte | |
| offset; an insert shifts it and the interpreter resumes mid-line. This killed | |
| `ladder_456.sh` with `syntax error near unexpected token 'do'`. | |
| 2. **`pgrep -f <script>.sh` matches the shell running it.** Killed my own shell | |
| twice (exit 144). Exclude `$$`. | |
| 3. **Verify all rank shards** before trusting a checkpoint. A 3-of-4 set loads | |
| silently wrong, and a zero exit code is not proof -- bluscriptCP catches a | |
| failed save and only prints `[WARN]`. | |
| 4. **`say()` must write to stderr.** On stdout it poisons `$(...)` capture; that | |
| fed a 3-line path into `CP_INIT_FROM` and aborted a run on rank 2. | |
| 5. **Run-number collisions.** `run_number` is the first free | |
| `CP_BluScreipt_Training_logs/CP_Training_log<N>.csv`. A collision with an | |
| existing checkpoint prefix let `CP_CKPT_KEEP=1` prune a live shard. | |
| 6. **`CP_STABLE` cannot equal `CP_MAX_STEPS`** -- `bluscriptCP.cpp:1006` aborts | |
| with "leaves no cosine decay tail". Leave at least a 2-step tail; the guard | |
| reads `CP_WARMUP` while `get_lr` uses `CP_REWARMUP`, so pin both. | |
| 7. **`CP_REWARMUP_ANCHOR=0` on every resume**, or each resume re-anchors a fresh | |
| warmup ramp and the LR sawtooths (`bluscriptCP.cpp:2105`). | |
| ## Concurrently, on the 2x H100 box | |
| Long b3 arm at 16k: run 17, 4,000 steps, WSD with flat 3.0e-4 for steps | |
| 100-3899 then a 100-step tail. Tests whether more long-context STEPS flatten the | |
| slope -- the open question, since all arms sat at -18 to -29 pp/doubling while | |
| Phi-3.5-mini (3.8B) manages -3.6. Checkpointed every 25 steps, `KEEP=2`. An | |
| eval at step 1000 fires automatically, then the run resumes to 4000. | |
| ## Not to do | |
| - **b4/b5/b6 at a 16k window** -- l3 already showed truncated documents add | |
| nothing. b4 only becomes useful after a 64k extension. | |
| - **b6 in a matched ladder** -- 57 M training tokens is 0.27x of one 400-step | |
| arm; it would cycle 3.7x through all 790 documents. | |
| - **Chasing 128k.** No 4B-class model has effective 128k: applying RULER's own | |
| threshold (Llama2-7B at 4k = 85.6), Phi-3.5-mini (3.8B, 128k claimed) has an | |
| effective context of **32k**, and so does Llama-3.1-8B-instruct. 32k is the | |
| right target, and it is also where this corpus runs out (2.35 B tokens above | |
| 32k, total). | |