Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +12 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ Key design goals:
62
  Bolt Instruct V2 is a LoRA supervised fine-tune, trained to combine concise reasoning with precise tool use. The goal was to reduce unnecessary deliberation while preserving the ability to make tool calls. We chose supervised fine-tuning because we could demonstrate the behaviour we wanted directly: brief reasoning followed by the appropriate tool calls, including grouped calls for parallel execution.
63
  The training corpus contains 7,646 multi-step agentic sessions, filtered to include tool schemas, at least one reasoning block, and a genuine user request. Reasoning before tool calls had a median length of 29 tokens, and 91% of tool calls were preceded by reasoning. The corpus also included 14,204 turns with multiple tool calls, representing 17.4% of tool-calling turns and occurring in 47% of sessions. Sessions contained a median of 13 tool calls, with 63% containing at least 10. Together, these examples demonstrated concise reasoning, parallel tool calling, and sustained multi-step tool use.
64
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
65
  ---
66
 
67
  # Intended Use
@@ -109,13 +117,15 @@ print(processor.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:]))
109
 
110
  We evaluated Bolt Instruct V2 on raw performance on general-purpose and agentic tasks, as well as reasoning efficiency and time to complete a given task.
111
 
112
-
113
  ### Evaluation results for aisquared/bolt-instruct-v2:
114
 
115
  Measured with the sampling configuration published for Muse Glimmer
116
  **temperature 1.0 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 64**, high reasoning strength
117
  served with vLLM (`--generation-config auto`).
118
 
 
 
 
119
  ### Efficiency — per task
120
 
121
  | Metric | Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B(High) | **Bolt Instruct V2** | Gemma 4 31B (think on) |
@@ -128,7 +138,6 @@ served with vLLM (`--generation-config auto`).
128
  | | AutomationBench | 9,910 | **5,988** | 14,839 |
129
  | **Latency** | BFCL (mean) | 19.76 s | **12.60 s** | 7.47 s |
130
  | | τ²-bench | 64.9 s | **51.4 s** | 129.8 s |
131
- | | AutomationBench | 371.4 s | **342.1 s** | 1,079.8 s |
132
 
133
  ### Agentic — multi-turn
134
 
@@ -136,7 +145,6 @@ served with vLLM (`--generation-config auto`).
136
  |---|---|---|---|
137
  | τ²-bench @ temperature 0 | 85.37 | 76.83 | 84.15 |
138
  | τ²-bench @ published sampling ¹ | 34.45 | 30.64 | 85.21 |
139
- | AutomationBench ² | 45.38 | 27.70 | 48.89 |
140
 
141
  ### Agentic — single-turn tool calling
142
 
@@ -159,7 +167,7 @@ served with vLLM (`--generation-config auto`).
159
 
160
 
161
  Reasoning-token reduction versus Muse Glimmer 30B: **49.8%** (BFCL),
162
- **42.2%** (τ²-bench), **68.2%** (AutomationBench).
163
 
164
 
165
  **Reproduction.** τ²-bench and AutomationBench under their official
 
62
  Bolt Instruct V2 is a LoRA supervised fine-tune, trained to combine concise reasoning with precise tool use. The goal was to reduce unnecessary deliberation while preserving the ability to make tool calls. We chose supervised fine-tuning because we could demonstrate the behaviour we wanted directly: brief reasoning followed by the appropriate tool calls, including grouped calls for parallel execution.
63
  The training corpus contains 7,646 multi-step agentic sessions, filtered to include tool schemas, at least one reasoning block, and a genuine user request. Reasoning before tool calls had a median length of 29 tokens, and 91% of tool calls were preceded by reasoning. The corpus also included 14,204 turns with multiple tool calls, representing 17.4% of tool-calling turns and occurring in 47% of sessions. Sessions contained a median of 13 tool calls, with 63% containing at least 10. Together, these examples demonstrated concise reasoning, parallel tool calling, and sustained multi-step tool use.
64
 
65
+ ### Training Data
66
+
67
+ bolt-instruct-v2 was trained on a collected and generated set of data without commercial or other usage restrictions.
68
+
69
+ ### Training Hardware
70
+
71
+ bolt-instruct-v2 was trained for 18 hours on a 2xH200 cluster.
72
+
73
  ---
74
 
75
  # Intended Use
 
117
 
118
  We evaluated Bolt Instruct V2 on raw performance on general-purpose and agentic tasks, as well as reasoning efficiency and time to complete a given task.
119
 
 
120
  ### Evaluation results for aisquared/bolt-instruct-v2:
121
 
122
  Measured with the sampling configuration published for Muse Glimmer
123
  **temperature 1.0 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 64**, high reasoning strength
124
  served with vLLM (`--generation-config auto`).
125
 
126
+ ![efficiency_donuts](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6271334067ff0a433db23501/-U2ok6mZQ8si_7Ncx7gFz.png)
127
+
128
+
129
  ### Efficiency — per task
130
 
131
  | Metric | Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B(High) | **Bolt Instruct V2** | Gemma 4 31B (think on) |
 
138
  | | AutomationBench | 9,910 | **5,988** | 14,839 |
139
  | **Latency** | BFCL (mean) | 19.76 s | **12.60 s** | 7.47 s |
140
  | | τ²-bench | 64.9 s | **51.4 s** | 129.8 s |
 
141
 
142
  ### Agentic — multi-turn
143
 
 
145
  |---|---|---|---|
146
  | τ²-bench @ temperature 0 | 85.37 | 76.83 | 84.15 |
147
  | τ²-bench @ published sampling ¹ | 34.45 | 30.64 | 85.21 |
 
148
 
149
  ### Agentic — single-turn tool calling
150
 
 
167
 
168
 
169
  Reasoning-token reduction versus Muse Glimmer 30B: **49.8%** (BFCL),
170
+ **42.2%** (τ²-bench).
171
 
172
 
173
  **Reproduction.** τ²-bench and AutomationBench under their official