Datasets:
|
Download README.md from CodonProject/TinySFT: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 11.1 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/CodonProject/TinySFT/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/CodonProject/TinySFT/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/CodonProject/TinySFT/resolve/main/README.md
11.1 kB
| pretty_name: TinySFT | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| - zh | |
| license: other | |
| task_categories: | |
| - text-generation | |
| tags: | |
| - sft | |
| - chain-of-thought | |
| - reasoning-effort | |
| - tool-calling | |
| - agentic | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 100K<n<1M | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: default | |
| data_files: | |
| - split: train | |
| path: data/train-*.parquet | |
| # TinySFT | |
| TinySFT contains 848,063 supervised fine-tuning samples for **SFT of small models**. Each sample includes a system message, preserves the native tool-calling structure, and every assistant turn carries a `reasoning_effort` label (`none` / `low` / `high` / `max`) indicating how much thinking that turn should require. | |
| The dataset has 848,063 rows / 980,750 assistant turns / 1 parquet file, about 1.4 GiB in total. Rows are globally shuffled; each file is a random sample of the full corpus. The maximum length per row is 8,000 length units (≈ tokens). | |
| ## Quick Start | |
| ```python | |
| from datasets import load_dataset | |
| ds = load_dataset('CodonProject/TinySFT', split='train') | |
| ``` | |
| ```python | |
| cols = ['id', 'source', 'subset', 'domain', 'language', 'system', | |
| 'system_synth', 'tool_json', 'session', 'n_turns', 'n_assistant', | |
| 'effort_none', 'effort_low', 'effort_high', 'effort_max', 'est_len'] | |
| ds = ds.select_columns(cols) | |
| row = ds[0] | |
| print(row['system'][:200]) | |
| for turn in row['session']: | |
| print(turn['role'], turn['reasoning_effort'], len(turn['cot'])) | |
| ``` | |
| Tool-calling argument schemas differ across sources, so they are stored as JSON strings and must be parsed by the user: | |
| ```python | |
| import json | |
| for name in row['tool_json']: # declared tools | |
| spec = json.loads(name) | |
| for turn in row['session']: # tool calls issued by the model | |
| if turn['tool_call_json']: | |
| for call in json.loads(turn['tool_call_json']): | |
| print(call.get('name'), call.get('param') or call.get('arguments')) | |
| ``` | |
| ## Fields | |
| | Column | Type | Description | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | `id` | int64 | Row identifier, unique across the dataset | | |
| | `type` | str | Always `"SFT"` | | |
| | `source` | str | Source dataset `owner/name` | | |
| | `subset` | str | Source subset name (only some sources have it; otherwise an empty string) | | |
| | `domain` | str | `agentic` / `medical` / `math` / `general` / `science` / `code` / `safety` / `psychology` | | |
| | `language` | str | `en` or `zh` | | |
| | `system` | str | System message, always non-empty | | |
| | `system_synth` | bool | `true` = the original sample had no system message; this one was written based on the domain | | |
| | `tool_json` | list<str> | Declared tool schemas, each element is a JSON string; empty list = no tools used | | |
| | `session` | list<struct> | Conversation turns, see below | | |
| | `n_turns` / `n_assistant` | int32 | Total turns / assistant turns | | |
| | `effort_none` … `effort_max` | int32 | Number of assistant turns in this row for each effort level, convenient for direct filtering in SQL | | |
| | `est_len` | int32 | Estimated length for this row (length unit ≈ token), max 8000 | | |
| | `dropped_turns` / `cut_chars` | int32 | Number of turns dropped / characters cut to meet the length limit; both 0 means kept as is | | |
| | `system_cut` / `tools_cut` | bool | Whether the system / tool declarations were truncated | | |
| | `file_idx` / `offset` | int32 / int64 | Used to trace back to the source file and row offset | | |
| Each turn in `session` has the following structure: | |
| | Field | Type | Description | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | `role` | str | `human` (user) / `model` (assistant) / `tool_response` (tool return) | | |
| | `content` | str | Turn content | | |
| | `cot` | str | Thought block for this turn; empty string when `reasoning_effort == "none"` | | |
| | `reasoning_effort` | str | Only present on `role == "model"` turns: `none` / `low` / `high` / `max` | | |
| | `tool_call_json` | str | Tool call issued in this turn (JSON string); empty string if none | | |
| ## What Is `reasoning_effort`? | |
| It is a reasoning-effort label on each assistant turn, indicating how much thinking should be spent on that turn. | |
| | Level | Meaning | Turns | Share | Average `cot` characters | | |
| |---|---|---|---|---| | |
| | `none` | No thought block; the model directly answers or issues a tool call (`cot` is always empty). | 158,131 | 16.1% | 0 | | |
| | `low` | Short thinking: one or two sentences to confirm constraints or directly apply a known solution, without elaboration. | 376,072 | 38.3% | 489 | | |
| | `high` | Medium thinking: step-by-step derivation or bullet-point planning, but without exhaustive enumeration or repeated self-checking. | 352,051 | 35.9% | 1,233 | | |
| | `max` | Long thinking: comparing multiple approaches, item-by-item enumeration and verification, drafting first and then looking for counterexamples, or long-horizon tool planning. | 94,496 | 9.6% | 4,439 | | |
| ## Common Filters | |
| ```python | |
| # Samples with at least one turn of high/max thinking | |
| ds_deep = ds.filter(lambda r: r['effort_high'] + r['effort_max'] > 0) | |
| # Samples with tool declarations (agentic / tool calling) | |
| ds_tools = ds.filter(lambda r: len(r['tool_json']) > 0) | |
| # Chinese / English only | |
| ds_zh = ds.filter(lambda r: r['language'] == 'zh') | |
| ds_en = ds.filter(lambda r: r['language'] == 'en') | |
| # Avoid long samples; suitable for models with short context | |
| ds_short = ds.filter(lambda r: r['est_len'] <= 2048) | |
| # Single-turn QA only | |
| ds_single = ds.filter(lambda r: r['n_assistant'] == 1) | |
| # Extract effort per turn for length-bucketed training | |
| def turns(rows): | |
| for row in rows: | |
| for turn in row['session']: | |
| if turn['role'] == 'model': | |
| yield { | |
| 'effort': turn['reasoning_effort'], | |
| 'cot_chars': len(turn['cot']), | |
| 'domain': row['domain'], | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| ## Scale and Distribution | |
| ### By Domain | |
| | Domain | Rows | Share | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | Math (`math`) | 401,504 | 47.3% | | |
| | General (`general`) | 141,394 | 16.7% | | |
| | Medical (`medical`) | 101,775 | 12.0% | | |
| | Tool / multi-turn agent (`agentic`) | 96,593 | 11.4% | | |
| | Science (`science`) | 69,435 | 8.2% | | |
| | Psychology (`psychology`) | 15,328 | 1.8% | | |
| | Code (`code`) | 12,670 | 1.5% | | |
| | Safety / values (`safety`) | 9,364 | 1.1% | | |
| ### By Language | |
| | Language | Rows | Share | | |
| |---|---|---| | |
| | English (`en`) | 696,496 | 82.1% | | |
| | Chinese (`zh`) | 151,567 | 17.9% | | |
| ## Example | |
| ```json | |
| { | |
| "id": 9896351587098, | |
| "type": "SFT", | |
| "source": "cs-giung/math-think-sft-mini", | |
| "subset": "", | |
| "domain": "math", | |
| "language": "en", | |
| "system": "You are a careful mathematical problem solver. Work through the problem step by step and state the final answer clearly.", | |
| "system_synth": true, | |
| "system_cut": false, | |
| "tools_cut": false, | |
| "tool_json": [], | |
| "session": [ | |
| { | |
| "role": "human", | |
| "content": "Can the number of diagonals of a polygon be exactly twice the number of its sides?", | |
| "cot": "", | |
| "reasoning_effort": "", | |
| "tool_call_json": "" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "role": "model", | |
| "content": "To determine if a polygon can have exactly twice as many diagonals as its number of sides, let's analyze the relationship mathematically.\n\n### Step 1: Understanding the Formula for Diagonals\nThe number of diagonals \\( D … [849 more chars]", | |
| "cot": "First, I recall that the number of diagonals in a polygon can be calculated using the formula \\( \\frac{n(n - 3)}{2} \\), where \\( n \\) is the number of sides.\nThe problem states that the number of diagonals is exactly twi… [576 more chars]", | |
| "reasoning_effort": "low", | |
| "tool_call_json": "" | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| "n_turns": 2, | |
| "n_assistant": 1, | |
| "effort_none": 0, | |
| "effort_low": 1, | |
| "effort_high": 0, | |
| "effort_max": 0, | |
| "est_len": 626, | |
| "dropped_turns": 0, | |
| "cut_chars": 0, | |
| "file_idx": 9, | |
| "offset": 746937114 | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| ## About the Content | |
| - **Tool samples**: 39,495 rows (4.7%). `tool_json` contains tool declarations, `tool_call_json` in `session` contains the model's calls, and `tool_response` turns contain execution results. Tool names and parameter schemas preserve each source's native format. | |
| - **Supplemented system messages**: 727,277 rows (85.8%). These source samples originally had no system message. A 1–2 sentence short system message was written based on domain and language, marked with `system_synth: true`, so users can choose whether to include it. | |
| - **Tool result length limit is 2000 characters**; longer results (e.g., full articles or complete files) are truncated. This is the largest source of information loss in long trajectories. | |
| - **Reasoning labels are generated by rule-based heuristics**, based on length, structure, and wording signals (self-correction, verification, multiple approaches, planning, number of tool turns, and domain difficulty). This method is an approximate annotation, not human annotation; within the same level, the depth of thinking may still vary, especially at the `low` / `high` boundary. | |
| ## Sources | |
| | Source | Rows | Language | Domain | | |
| |---|---|---|---| | |
| | `cs-giung/math-think-sft-mini` | 352,425 | en | math | | |
| | `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#general` | 68,832 | zh | general+math+science+psychology+medical+code+agentic | | |
| | `lingshu-medical-mllm/ReasonMed` | 65,329 | en | medical | | |
| | `Glint-Research/Complete-FABLE.5-traces-2M` | 57,213 | en | agentic | | |
| | `zake7749/OpenScience-Chinese-Reasoning-SFT` | 49,999 | zh | science | | |
| | `r0b0tlab/qwen3.8-max-distillation-50k` | 49,758 | en | general | | |
| | `faunix/Qwen3.8-27B-Distillation-40K` | 39,994 | en | general | | |
| | `zake7749/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Tool-Calling` | 28,271 | en | agentic | | |
| | `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#values_safety` | 27,032 | zh | science+safety+psychology+medical+code+math+agentic | | |
| | `stindardlogic/math-reasoning-sft-100k` | 19,786 | en | math | | |
| | `qiaojin/PubMedQA` | 19,656 | en | medical | | |
| | `OysterCoreAI/SFT-General-Simplified.Chinese-10K` | 10,049 | zh | general | | |
| | `TeichAI/Ox-Alpha-10k` | 9,954 | en | general | | |
| | `FreedomIntelligence/medical-o1-reasoning-SFT` | 8,183 | en | medical | | |
| | `r0b0tlab/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-agentic` | 8,097 | en | agentic | | |
| | `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#math` | 7,966 | zh | math+science+code | | |
| | `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#psychology` | 6,970 | zh | psychology+medical+science | | |
| | `nvidia/Nemotron-SFT-SWE-v3.5` | 5,115 | en | code | | |
| | `hotdogs/code-analysis-sft-qwen38-v2` | 4,375 | en | code | | |
| | `zake7749/Qwen-3.5-Reasonlite-Verified` | 4,310 | en | general | | |
| | `TeichAI/DeepSeek-v4-Pro-Agent` | 2,575 | en | agentic | | |
| | `CodonProject/Organic-Reasoning-195k#frontier` | 1,893 | zh | science+code+math+psychology+medical+agentic | | |
| | `TeichAI/Fable-5-Cursor-Traces` | 244 | en | agentic | | |
| | `Glint-Research/Fable-5-traces` | 30 | en | agentic | | |
| | `greghavens/kimi-k3-coding-and-debugging-traces` | 7 | en | code | | |
| Each source's original copyright and license are on its own dataset page. This dataset is a derivative work of these sources and does not declare a separate unified license; please follow each source's terms when using it. |