You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Records quote public product/restaurant reviews (Amazon Reviews 2023, Google Local 2021) and Enron emails, whose authors did not license them to us. Access is for non-commercial research only (CC-BY-NC-4.0 for our contributions; third-party text under its owners' terms; see LICENSE.md). Names and user ids are pseudonymized with a published key, which is reversible. Do not attempt to identify, contact or profile the people behind reviews or emails. The Claude Opus 5.5-rendered half of TEST (test_b) is for evaluation only and must not be used for training. Removal requests: research@envloop.ai.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

Pev-Bench

Paper (PDF) · Code · Model · Leaderboard · Collection

Pev-Bench: decision records for a personal agent with long-term memory (MUSE-style), built from real public behaviour plus synthetic personal rules, rendered into natural text by an LLM and verified against a structured knowledge base. Each record is one state (memory, current requests, candidate actions, sometimes 1k–6k tokens of distractor text) with 1–3 typed questions and their labels. Code, pre-registration and the technical report are in the Pev repository; the model trained on it is Pev-27B. Authors: EnvLoop Research (research@envloop.ai).

Results on Pev-Bench

Each model was run once on TEST (720 new users, 980 states, 2,156 scorable questions); full tables in the model card and the technical report.

TEST macro accuracy

TEST family-macro accuracy per model, overall and per renderer half (A: gpt-6-astra, B: Claude Opus 5.5).

TEST paired deltas

Pev-27B minus each model on TEST, family-macro accuracy with paired 95% CIs, overall and per half.

HIDDEN per-family accuracy

Per-family accuracy on HIDDEN for the base model (orange) and Pev-27B (blue), with chance marks.

DEV references

DEV accuracy per family and predictor.

Splits

Split Records (states) Questions Scorable (unique label) Users Renderer Use
train 1,970 5,001 4,341 1,331 gpt-6-astra training (Pev-Bench part only; see "General mix")
val 357 897 784 251 gpt-6-astra temperature / threshold fitting, hill-climbing analysis
dev 630 1,626 1,409 428 gpt-6-astra model selection (scores only during development)
test (test_a, test_b) 980 (490 + 490) 2,506 (1,252 + 1,254) 2,156 (1,073 + 1,083) 654 of 720 (325 + 329) A: gpt-6-astra, B: Claude Opus 5.5 final comparison, one run per model; evaluation only

Users are disjoint across splits (split by user id before any generation). The one-shot HIDDEN gate set used during development is not released. Questions per family are balanced by construction (labels, answer positions). "Users" counts distinct pseudonymous users that appear in records (TEST drew 720 new users; 654 appear in a kept record).

Also included: general_mix_ids.jsonl — for each of the 1,747 Kev general-mix records the adapter was trained on (not redistributed, see below): source, revision, row, question count, text/row/record SHA-256 and position in the original training file, so a rebuild with scripts/general_mix.py can be checked.

TEST was built by an independent builder after the model was frozen (amendment 6 of the pre-registration): 720 users not in any other split, the same generator and public styles as DEV, half the users rendered by gpt-6-astra (test_a, ids muse/test-a/…) and half by Claude Opus 5.5 under the same rendering contract (test_b, muse/test-b/…). It was pseudonymized before any model was scored; cat test_a.jsonl test_b.jsonl is byte-identical to the scored file (SHA-256 131d092796bb518b3134eef5ca9fe3f86ec9b6ae5535de6483f8e47a25e279a3). pick_option on TEST has a residual "priciest" shortcut (0.347 vs a chance of 0.276; A +10.9, B +2.9 points), reported next to every pick_option result (amendment 7).

Format

{"id": "muse/val/12/4",
 "state": "Current time=21/11/2021 15:16\n\ntype: memory\n...",
 "questions": {"pick_option": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "...", "criteria": {"<option>": "<description>", "...": "..."},
                               "label": "<option>", "src": "muse/pick_option"},
               "share_ok": {"type": "noul", "criteria": {"true": "...", "false": "..."}, "label": true, "...": "..."},
               "notify_level": {"type": "score", "criteria": ["silent: ...", "digest: ...", "notify: ...", "interrupt: ..."],
                                "label": 2, "soft_label": {"0": 0.3333, "1": 0.3333, "2": 0.3333}, "...": "..."}},
 "meta": {"user_id": "<pseudonym>", "state_id": "val/12/4", "families": {"...": "..."},
          "anchors": {"<qid>": {"required": ["<verbatim evidence>"], "forbidden": []}},
          "variants": {"<qid>": "clean | override | removed | buried+..."},
          "render": {"model": "gpt-6-astra", "style_id": "pub-kv-log", "prompt_sha256": "..."},
          "release": {"anonymized": true, "replacements": {"person_name": 3}}}}

meta.release.anonymized: true marks a record that went through the pseudonymization pass (the field name predates the wording; the records are pseudonymized, not anonymized). meta.render.model is gpt-6-astra or claude-opus-5-5.

Labels follow Kev: choice = option name, yes/no = true/false, score = zero-based level. A soft_label whose maximum is tied marks an ambiguous question (evidence removed): it counts only for Brier/ECE/NLL, never for accuracy or training. meta.anchors lists the verbatim evidence each label rests on; every record passed the anchor check.

How it was built

  1. Sources (normalised by scripts/acquire/): Amazon Reviews 2023 (5 categories) and Google Local 2021 (food businesses in DC, DE, RI) for real users' histories; OpenFlights for airports/routes; the Enron corpus (20,000 sampled emails, addresses/phones/URLs scrubbed) as distractor text.
  2. Knowledge base: per user, the first 60% of the time-ordered history becomes memory (with facts extracted from the review text, verbatim evidence required), later interactions are real choices. Synthetic, seeded per user: approval rules, privacy levels, contacts (fictional names at example.com), calendar, notification rules, forget requests, connected services.
  3. Questions: 7 deterministic families read only the KB (labels never come from an LLM or from any model's correctness). Hard variants: preference overrides, removed evidence (soft labels), buried evidence.
  4. Rendering: gpt-6-astra turns the structured state into natural text in one of 9 public styles (key-value logs, chat, email threads, journals, Chinese notes, …); every required anchor must appear verbatim and every forbidden anchor must be absent, or the state is dropped. TEST-B uses Claude Opus 5.5 with the same contract.
  5. Validity: oracle, null baselines (majority, constant position, shuffled labels) and shortcut baselines per family; known residual shortcuts in pick_option are reported (DEV centroid +2.5, HIDDEN medoid +3.3, TEST "priciest" +7.1 points over chance).
  6. Release export: personal-decisions export-release (below).

Pseudonymization

Names and user ids are pseudonymized for readability and consistency; this is not anonymization. The key is published (release/pseudonym_key.txt in the code repository) so the export is exactly reproducible from the public source datasets; the mapping is therefore reversible. All source data were already public.

  • meta.user_id = HMAC-SHA256(key, internal id)[:16].
  • Person names detected in states and instructions -> keyed pseudonyms of the same shape, consistently within and across records; emails, phones, URLs and street addresses -> [EMAIL]/[PHONE]/[URL]/[ADDRESS].
  • Options, labels and soft labels are never changed; anchors are rewritten consistently and re-checked.
  • Effect: 7,054 names in train, 1,218 in val, 2,071 in dev, 2,081 + 1,635 in test_a + test_b, almost all inside Enron distractor emails (per-file receipts in docs/DATA.md of the code repository).
  • Limits: the name detector is rule-based. Strings it still flags after the pass ("residual detections": train 10 names + 1 address, val 4, dev 2, test 7) were reviewed for TEST: none is an unreplaced name of a real person (a pseudonym next to an adjacent capitalised word, or a product name). Its recall is limited: names written "Last, First" (frequent in Enron distribution lists), all-capital names and names outside its first-name list are not replaced. They occur almost only in the Enron distractor text, a public corpus.

The DEV/VAL numbers in the technical report and the results were computed on the pre-pseudonymization text. The released val/dev are the pseudonymized versions (options and labels unchanged), so re-running on them may differ slightly. The headline comparisons are on test, which was pseudonymized before scoring (released TEST == scored TEST).

General mix (not included)

The released adapter was also trained on 1,860 general decision questions from Kev's evals/decision-v2/train.jsonl (commit 0fe8fc97). Those rows contain text from AG News, Amazon-multi, Banking77, BoolQ, DBpedia-14, IMDB, MNLI, SST-5, TREC and Yelp under their own terms (several forbid redistribution), so they are not in this dataset; scripts/general_mix.py rebuilds them (seed 20261004, leakage audit included).

Personal and sensitive information

  • Records quote real public reviews verbatim (about 62% of records) and real Enron emails (buried distractors in about 25% of records). A web search for a quoted review can find the original post and its author's public profile. Do not attempt to identify people.
  • Everything about a user other than their reviews is synthetic: approval thresholds, privacy settings, contacts, calendars, notification rules and forget requests were generated from a seed, not observed. Nothing in a record says anything true about the real reviewer beyond what their public reviews say.
  • Removal requests: research@envloop.ai. We remove a user's or an email's records on request and publish a new revision.

Licensing and attribution

Research use only, gated (see LICENSE.md):

  • Our contributions (structure, labels, synthetic rules, rendered wording): CC-BY-NC-4.0.
  • Third-party text quoted in the records remains under its owners' terms: Amazon Reviews 2023 and Google Local 2021 (UCSD McAuley Lab, released for research), Enron corpus (CMU research release).
  • Contains information from OpenFlights, made available under the Open Database License (ODbL 1.0); the records are a Produced Work of it. The derived airport/route tables are not distributed; scripts/acquire/openflights.py and personal-decisions build rebuild them.
  • Rendered by gpt-6-astra (TRAIN, VAL, DEV and TEST-A) and Claude Opus 5.5 (TEST-B). val, dev and test are evaluation splits; TEST-B (test_b.jsonl) is for evaluation only and must not be used to train models.

Citation

@techreport{envloop_pev,
  title       = {Pev: A Calibrated Fast-Decision Model for Personal Agents},
  author      = {{EnvLoop Research}},
  institution = {EnvLoop},
  url         = {https://github.com/EnvLoop/Pev}
}

Please also cite the data sources and models listed under References. Contact and removal requests: research@envloop.ai.

References

Downloads last month
12

Models trained or fine-tuned on EnvLoop/Pev-Bench

Space using EnvLoop/Pev-Bench 1

Collection including EnvLoop/Pev-Bench

Paper for EnvLoop/Pev-Bench