missing_prediction / README.md
phamhcuong's picture
Remove regression Gaussian NB and refresh results
244574a verified
|
Raw History Blame
5.44 kB
metadata
license: other
tags:
  - missing-data
  - imputation
  - benchmark
  - healthcare

Missing-Data Prediction Benchmark — results

Two experiments on medical datasets under simulated missingness (MCAR/MAR/MNAR, rates 0.1–0.5, seeds 42/1/7), reported as mean [95% CI].

This release contains the complete Information-Acquisition benchmark at a uniform missing rate of 0.3. Scenario 2 includes local AFA-engine results, curves, seed-aggregated CI tables, qualitative examples, classification AUROC, and per-engine cached/uncached token accounting across five classification datasets (arrhythmia, breast_cancer, gallstone, heart_disease, parkinsons) and four regression datasets (diabetes, nhanes, who_life_expectancy, medical_cost).

Scenario 1 uses gpt-5.6-terra to select features and predict directly. It is complete for the same classification and regression dataset sets. Classification Scenario 1 reports accuracy, F1, precision, and recall are preserved from the original label-only query. Classification AUROC comes from a separate probability replay with the original selection path unchanged; this mixed provenance is noted in the A/B report. Regression Scenario 1 predicts a continuous numeric target and reports RMSE, MAE, and R2. MIMIC Scenario 1 is absent because credentialed MIMIC-derived records are not sent to third-party APIs.

No patient-level records, raw MIMIC data, trained models, or LLM traces containing MIMIC features are published.

Classification Scenario 1 vs Scenario 2

dataset mech LLM acc AFA acc LLM F1 AFA F1 LLM AUROC AFA AUROC best AFA LLM tokens S2 cached S2 uncached ↓ cached ↓ uncached
arrhythmia MAR 0.458 0.736 0.44 0.734 0.494 0.772 random_forest 10,516,156 31,992 417,730 99.7% 96.0%
arrhythmia MCAR 0.473 0.74 0.456 0.738 0.431 0.784 random_forest 10,544,703 31,992 404,444 99.7% 96.2%
arrhythmia MNAR 0.513 0.707 0.495 0.704 0.423 0.771 random_forest 10,926,848 31,992 414,435 99.7% 96.2%
breast_cancer MAR 0.921 0.977 0.921 0.977 0.979 0.996 smart 348,937 4,835 56,524 98.6% 83.8%
breast_cancer MCAR 0.927 0.98 0.927 0.979 0.979 0.996 mim_smim 373,315 4,191 13,165 98.9% 96.5%
breast_cancer MNAR 0.927 0.974 0.927 0.974 0.983 0.995 smart 348,073 4,835 67,905 98.6% 80.5%
gallstone MAR 0.495 0.771 0.483 0.769 0.543 0.838 hist_gb 823,103 5,990 50,355 99.3% 93.9%
gallstone MCAR 0.495 0.755 0.482 0.755 0.484 0.814 mim_smim 830,642 6,043 43,630 99.3% 94.7%
gallstone MNAR 0.51 0.771 0.499 0.77 0.49 0.817 random_forest 814,237 6,043 48,555 99.3% 94.0%
heart_disease MAR 0.7 0.844 0.698 0.844 0.78 0.903 smart 197,635 2,068 18,610 99.0% 90.6%
heart_disease MCAR 0.694 0.856 0.693 0.855 0.672 0.893 mim_smim 208,505 2,068 11,775 99.0% 94.4%
heart_disease MNAR 0.694 0.833 0.693 0.833 0.768 0.899 smart 198,665 2,068 18,187 99.0% 90.8%
parkinsons MAR 0.761 0.897 0.776 0.889 0.841 0.961 hist_gb 159,996 3,368 19,475 97.9% 87.8%
parkinsons MCAR 0.752 0.889 0.767 0.887 0.87 0.931 hist_gb 155,967 3,322 15,660 97.9% 90.0%
parkinsons MNAR 0.744 0.872 0.759 0.873 0.836 0.948 xgboost 164,584 3,373 14,908 98.0% 90.9%

How to read (no download needed)

Every CSV opens in HuggingFace's Dataset Viewer (sortable, in-browser):

  • experiment1_prediction/prediction_classification_long.csv / prediction_regression_long.csv — one tidy row per (method, dataset, mechanism, rate, seed) with all metrics + status. This is the clean, flat view of every run (no folder-diving).
  • experiment1_prediction/classification_mean_ci.csv / regression_mean_ci.csv — the same, collapsed to mean [95% CI] over seeds (blank cells carry a Status).
  • experiment2_acquisition/acquisition_ab_report.csv — matched-sample classification Scenario 1 vs Scenario 2 accuracy and token comparison.
  • experiment2_acquisition/curves_long.csv — per-budget Scenario 2 trajectories and Scenario 1 trajectories for both tasks.
  • experiment2_acquisition/acquisition_curves_ci.csv / acquisition_final_ci.csv — seed-aggregated metrics for both scenarios.
  • experiment2_acquisition/scenario2_method_token_accounting.csv — per-engine cached and uncached Scenario-2 token accounting.
  • DATA_DICTIONARY.md — column definitions and status meanings.
  • raw_prediction/ — per-cell raw Exp-1 metric JSON (in-scope datasets, canonical layout, see raw_prediction/README_LATEST.md).
  • raw_acquisition/ — per-cell raw complete Scenario-1 LLM and Scenario-2 AFA outputs (no model weights).

Data-use / MIMIC-III notice

One regression dataset (mimic_lengthofstay) is derived from MIMIC-III, credentialed under the PhysioNet Data Use Agreement. This repository contains only aggregate derived metrics — no patient-level records, no raw MIMIC data, and no models trained on MIMIC.

Generated 2026-09-09 by scripts/reporting/prepare_hf_upload.py.