| # Scientific review guide |
|
|
| Read the PDF for the argument and the LaTeX source for exact mathematics. This guide points to existing manuscript sections; it adds no scientific results. |
|
|
| | Review question | Entry point | |
| |---|---| |
| | What does the Rayo connection actually supply? | Sections 1–2 | |
| | Does the old grammar include the incumbent's real capabilities, sharing, and installed modules? | Section 3; operational adequacy condition | |
| | Does an extension preserve the same meaning and contract? | Section 4 | |
| | Are a valid old lower bound and a complete new upper bound compared? | Section 5; productive boundary escape theorem | |
| | Are actual work and allocated budgets distinguished? | Section 6 | |
| | Which assumptions permit repeated savings, and which remain unproved? | Section 7 | |
| | What is the proposed bounded implementation loop? | Section 8 | |
| | What is preserved through architectural change? | Section 9 | |
| | Which baselines and causal ablations distinguish the proposal from prior approaches? | Section 10 | |
| | What finite optimization model, counterexamples, ledger, and dependencies are supplied? | Appendices A–E | |
|
|
| The key open question is whether class-wide obstruction certificates and useful extensions can be discovered cheaply enough, and transferred widely enough, to repay their complete cost in later improvement episodes. |
|
|
| The proposed multi-generation evaluation is a future protocol. No executed experiments, benchmark scores, autonomous system, or mechanized certificate artifacts accompany this release. JSONL records preserve supplied arguments and stated status; their successful parsing or reconstruction does not establish mathematical correctness. |
|
|
