Datasets:
|
Download README.md from syntaxixr/receipts-study: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.19 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/syntaxixr/receipts-study/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/syntaxixr/receipts-study/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/syntaxixr/receipts-study/resolve/main/README.md
4.19 kB
| license: cc-by-4.0 | |
| pretty_name: "Receipts: do the tests in a fix catch the bug?" | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| tags: | |
| - code | |
| - testing | |
| - software-engineering | |
| - ai-agents | |
| - coding-agents | |
| - claude | |
| - claude-code | |
| - agent-skills | |
| - pull-requests | |
| - red-green | |
| - tdd | |
| size_categories: | |
| - n<1K | |
| task_categories: | |
| - text-classification | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: changes | |
| data_files: data/changes.jsonl | |
| default: true | |
| - config_name: tests | |
| data_files: data/tests.jsonl | |
| # Receipts study: do the tests in a fix catch the bug? | |
|  | |
| 181 real code changes from 17 open-source repositories. For each one, every test the change added or edited was run twice: with the change, and with the changed source files reverted to the parent commit or the pull request's merge base. A test for a fix should fail without it. | |
| Made with [Receipts](https://github.com/syntaxixr/receipts), which does this check for any pull request (CLI, GitHub Action, and a skill for Claude Code and other coding agents). | |
| Try it on your own branch, nothing to install: `npx github:syntaxixr/receipts check` | |
| ## Results | |
| | | Changes | Judged | Proven | Mixed | Unproven | Weak only | | |
| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | |
| | Maintainer fix commits | 81 | 71 | 64 (90%) | 2 (3%) | 5 (7%) | 0 (0%) | | |
| | Agent pull requests | 100 | 91 | 75 (82%) | 5 (5%) | 2 (2%) | 9 (10%) | | |
| Percentages are of judged changes. The gap that shows up only in agent work is *weak only*: every test fails on the old code just because it imports a name the change adds, so no test ever runs against the old behavior. No maintainer commit had that shape. | |
| ## Configurations | |
| - **`changes`** (default): one row per change. `group` is `maintainer` (fix commits on the default branch) or `agent` (pull requests whose commits carry a coding agent's fingerprint: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot). `outcome` is `proven`, `mixed`, `unproven`, `weak`, or `env` when the tests could not be judged in this environment. The verdict columns count the change's tests per verdict. | |
| - **`tests`**: one row per judged test, with its verdict and the raw outcomes with and without the change (`with_change`, `without_change`; failures were re-run to spot flakes). | |
| ## Verdicts | |
| | Verdict | With the change | Without it | Meaning | | |
| |---|---|---|---| | |
| | PROVEN | passes | fails | The test catches what the change fixes | | |
| | GUARD | passes | passes | Guards neighboring behavior next to a PROVEN test | | |
| | THEATER | passes | passes | No test proves the change | | |
| | WEAK | passes | fails on import | The code it calls did not exist yet | | |
| | BROKEN | fails | | The change does not pass its own test | | |
| | FLAKY | mixed | mixed | Different results on the same code | | |
| | SKIPPED | skipped | | The test did not run | | |
| | PRESERVED / CHANGED | | | For behavior-preserving changes: passes on both sides / fails on the old code | | |
| ## Method and caveats | |
| Maintainer sample: recent single-parent commits on the default branch whose message mentions a fix, a bug or an issue, and that change both code and tests (click, itsdangerous, markupsafe, sqlparse, humanize, marshmallow, more-itertools, tomlkit, dateutil, dayjs, ufo, defu). Agent sample: up to 20 pull requests per repository, newest first, open and closed alike (anthropics/claude-agent-sdk-python, openai/openai-agents-python, PrefectHQ/fastmcp, modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk, simonw/llm). | |
| Each project was installed once at the tip of its default branch, so older changes can fail for environmental reasons; those are `env` and excluded from the percentages. The samples are small and not random: the numbers describe these projects, not the ecosystem. "Agent-authored" means an agent's fingerprint appears in the PR's commits; humans steer those agents. Full method: [docs/study.md](https://github.com/syntaxixr/receipts/blob/main/docs/study.md). Scripts to reproduce: [study/](https://github.com/syntaxixr/receipts/tree/main/study). | |
| ## License | |
| The data (verdicts, test ids, commit subjects and links) is released under CC BY 4.0. The code it describes belongs to its projects under their own licenses. | |