al1729's picture
const_v3 ConflictScope: 11188 kept / 40439 raw, csv 7aa841d17ade cache 97ea463656ff
1deaaeb verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
5.69 kB
---
language:
- en
license: apache-2.0
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
task_categories:
- text-generation
pretty_name: constitution_tenets_v3 ConflictScope scenarios
tags:
- values
- alignment
- evaluation
- conflictscope
- constitution
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/scenarios.parquet
---
# constitution_tenets_v3 ConflictScope scenarios
11,188 value-conflict scenarios over the 66 `constitution_tenets_v3`
tenets, each with a cached opening user message, for the interactive
[ConflictScope](https://github.com/andyjliu/conflictscope-dev) evaluation.
A scenario pits two tenets against each other; the assistant under test
answers the user's opening message, and a judge scores which of two
tenet-aligned actions the reply took (a choice and a 1–7 likert).
## Files
| path | what |
|---|---|
| `data/scenarios.parquet` | kept scenarios joined with their opening user turn; what `load_dataset` returns |
| `eval/scenarios/Qwen3.6-27B.csv` | the full 40,439-row generation CSV, verbatim: `keep_scenario` and the per-check `check_results` JSON. Drop-in `-d` directory for `evaluate_models.py` (it globs top-level `*.csv` and filters `keep_scenario`) |
| `eval/cache.json` | `{scenario_id: opening user message}` for exactly the kept ids. Drop-in `-o` directory with `--cache`, so the user simulator is never called |
| `eval/value_sets/constitution_tenets_v3.json` | the 66 tenet definitions (`{key: description}`) |
## Fields (`data/scenarios.parquet`)
| field | description |
|---|---|
| `scenario_id` | `<gen_model>_<value1>_<value2>_<pair>-<context>-<n>`; the cache key |
| `value1`, `value2` | the two conflicting tenets (keys into the value set) |
| `context` | scenario context tag |
| `description` | the scenario as given to the user simulator |
| `user_prompt` | the user-simulator role instructions |
| `action1`, `action2` | the two candidate assistant actions the judge scores between (action1 favours value1, action2 favours value2) |
| `user_first_turn` | the cached opening user message (artifacts already expanded inline) |
| `check_results` | JSON of the pass/fail filter checks, all True for kept rows |
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("value-generalization/conflictscope-eval-constitution-tenets-v3", split="train")
```
## Construction
- **Generation**: Qwen3.6-27B generated 40,439 candidate scenarios for
2,029 tenet pairs (all pairs whose tenets can plausibly conflict), then
judged each against six checks (realism, groundedness, action feasibility,
value-guidedness, impossibility, ambiguity); 11,731 passed and survived
near-duplicate removal.
- **Opening turns**: Qwen3.6-27B, as the user simulator, wrote each kept
scenario's opening message at temperature 1.0, expanding `<ARTIFACT>`
descriptions (emails, code, essays the user refers to) into inline text.
- **Splice cleanup** (`user_prompt_clean` check): the artifact expansion
sometimes spliced the generator's own refusal or deliberation into the user
turn. 1,281 turns were flagged by regex and re-sampled (952 patched, 329
unrecoverable); a full LLM-judge census of every turn (gemini-3.7-flash)
then found the remaining contamination. 543 scenarios were dropped
(329 unrecoverable + 86 still-contaminated patches + 128 never flagged),
leaving 11,188. Rows whose only defect is a cosmetic template label
were kept. Every kept turn was cleared by the judge.
- Per tenet: min 141 / median 325 / max 529 scenarios.
## Running the interactive eval
Needs the ConflictScope code (`andyjliu/conflictscope-dev`, branch `dev`,
commit `6d2030a` or later) and an OpenAI-compatible endpoint serving the
judge. Our runs use `Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B` as both judge and user simulator
(`vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --tensor-parallel-size 8`); with the cache in
place the user simulator is only called for ids missing from `cache.json`.
The assistant under test is loaded in-process by `-m` (a HF id or local
checkpoint; vLLM, one GPU for 7–8B models) or served remotely via
`--assistant-api-base`.
```bash
hf download value-generalization/conflictscope-eval-constitution-tenets-v3 --repo-type dataset --local-dir cs_v3
mkdir -p out && cp cs_v3/eval/cache.json out/ # eval writes CSVs next to the cache
python conflictscope/src/evaluate_models.py \
-m <assistant model or checkpoint dir> \
-d cs_v3/eval/scenarios -o out --output-name <tag>.csv \
-i --cache --filter --temperature 0 \
--user-model Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --user-api-base http://<judge-host>:8000/v1 \
--judge-model Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --judge-api-base http://<judge-host>:8000/v1 \
[--steer-prompt prompt.txt]
```
`--temperature 0` selects the script's conversation defaults (assistant
sampled at 1.0, 1,024 max tokens; judge at 0). Output CSV columns:
`scenario_id, value1, value2, choice, likert, reasoning, conversation`.
Steerability toward a tenet is then read off the `choice`/`likert` columns
over the rows where that tenet is `value1` or `value2`, against a base
model's CSV on the same scenarios. Copy the cache (don't symlink it into a
shared dir) — the script rewrites it in place on a cache miss.
## Caveats
- `check_results.user_prompt_clean` is `null` for rows that never passed the
generation filters (no opening turn was ever written for them).
- Opening turns were written by Qwen3.6-27B and reflect its style; a few
kept turns carry a harmless bare `**Artifact**` label.
- The base-eval CSVs for our reference models are not included.
## License
Apache-2.0. Scenarios and opening turns are model-generated (Qwen3.6-27B);
released for research use as part of the value-generalization project.