Spaces:
Running
Running
|
Download reports/reference_consolidation.md from ArchitSharma/InferScale-Sim: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.19 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/spaces/ArchitSharma/InferScale-Sim/resolve/main/reports/reference_consolidation.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://spaces/ArchitSharma/InferScale-Sim/reports/reference_consolidation.md
-
curl -L -o reference_consolidation.md https://huggingface.co/spaces/ArchitSharma/InferScale-Sim/resolve/main/reports/reference_consolidation.md
2.19 kB
InferScale Research Consolidation
Results in this report are simulator outputs unless an external-measurement validation section is present. Public device/model timings use analytical reference profiles rather than measured hardware benchmarks.
Study protocol
- Matched workload seeds: 12
- Bootstrap resamples: 600
- Robust Pareto objectives: p95 step TTFT, unused speculative prefetch, and mean prefix-HBM residency.
- Offline reference: bounded full-trace serving oracle over the declared policy/action-plan family.
Robust policy ranking
Robust winner: Top-1 decayed
Nominal first-seed winner: Top-1 decayed
| Rank | Policy | Median p95 TTFT | 95% CI of mean | TTFT wins | Pareto stability | Median oracle regret | Worst seed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Top-1 decayed | 6,474.9 ms | 5,105.7-8,966.0 ms | 41.7% | 75.0% | 59.3 ms | 14,688.1 ms |
| 2 | No prefetch | 6,490.7 ms | 5,079.3-8,648.9 ms | 41.7% | 91.7% | 34.7 ms | 14,328.2 ms |
| 3 | Utility-aware multi-step | 6,507.5 ms | 5,199.5-9,163.0 ms | 8.3% | 58.3% | 133.1 ms | 14,634.7 ms |
| 4 | Multi-step top-k | 6,640.3 ms | 5,341.7-9,082.2 ms | 8.3% | 83.3% | 215.0 ms | 15,000.0 ms |
Offline constrained oracle
- Candidate plans per seed: 19
- Median oracle p95 TTFT: 6,408.6 ms
- Definition:
bounded-full-trace-serving-oracle
The oracle exhaustively selects among the evaluated deployable policies plus clairvoyant future-set plans over H=1..5 and K=1..3 on each complete trace, under the same cache/bandwidth constraints. It is a bounded information upper bound, not a proof of globally optimal action scheduling.
Interpretation guardrails
- Bootstrap intervals quantify variation across simulated workload seeds; they do not quantify real-hardware model error.
- The offline oracle is bounded to an explicit action-plan family and should not be described as a globally optimal serving controller.
- Analytical reference profiles are hypotheses about timing. Hardware claims require independent measured validation.
- External calibration can correct global scale bias but does not prove fidelity for unseen models, devices, or scheduler regimes.